• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump spreading Russian propaganda at rally

Fletch said:
I didn't say it was better. What I am saying is he doesn't scan Russian tabloids for stories. This entire Russian 'connection' is just a nonsensical liberal attempt to distract attention from what is coming out from WikiLeaks. They cant deny the stuff so they have to distract attention away from it. I don't blame them, but it is still a distraction.
Click to expand...

No a distraction would point out that Julian Assange is accused of Sexual assault just like Trump.
 
SMTA said:
Nope - I always refer to Trump as a moron.....because he really are one!!

He also thought wrong - a blazing fool like Trump the Moron must be ridiculed whenever possible.

Anybody that ****ing stupid with such thin skin and a tiny animals brain is too easy a target.
Click to expand...

Who are the ones with thin skin again?

I mean, look at all the nancies crying over some dudes talking boastfully about womanizing........

I'd hate to see their reactions to some of the conversations our fine infantrymen have amongst themselves.
 
Last edited:
CriticalThought said:
Sigh...your reading comprehension is terrible.

A state owned Russian newspaper took one of the actual emails from WikiLeaks and intentionally manipulated it and wrote an article about the manipulated email. The same day Trump shared that story at his rally, and the Russian newspaper pulled the story when they realized their forgery had been too obvious.

So no, the contents of Podesta's Emails are not Russian propaganda, but the story Trump shared at one of his rallies from a fabricated version of an email was Russian propaganda.

Does that help?

Let me try to be more clear. The email that Trump shared was not Podesta's email, it was a fake, hoax version of one of the emails that Trump bought into and shared with his followers.
Click to expand...

I already said the Russians could do this, and was of course told where the conspiracy theory forum was located.
 
Last edited:
Caine said:
Who are the ones with thin skin again?

I mean, look at all the nancies crying over some dudes talking boastfully about womanizing........

I'd hate to see their reactions to some of the conversations our fine infantrymen have amongst themselves.
Click to expand...

I was referring to Trump.

He has skin thinner than a 13 y/o girl, the *****.
 
SMTA said:
I was referring to Trump.

He has skin thinner than a 13 y/o girl, the *****.
Click to expand...

He has such thin skin that he lets Howard Stern talk trashy about his daughter and doesn't bat an eye.

Yep.. such thin skin.

Meanwhile in nancy liberal world.....

572e954bd6a9e037819eda63430bb179.jpg
 
Fenton said:
Why would they need to do that ?? Like there isn't damning information in those Emails.

For example........

Under a House Subpoean, Clinton Aides discuss which emails to keep.....and to delete
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6391
Click to expand...

Can you quote the part of the email that's supposed to be scandalous? The last exchange was this one:

right to both

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Robby Mook <robbymook@gmail.com> wrote: >

Just for clarity: this House subpoena is just for Libya, right? > We were discussing releasing everything, no?
Click to expand...

So given the subpoena was for Libya, obviously they'd discuss which ones relate to Libya, since those were the emails requested. The final line is "yes to both" for everything and the Libya stuff.

I guess in right wing land, it's enough to scream EMAIL!!! and that's supposed to be proof of some scandal, like Pavlov's dogs or something.
 
JasperL said:
Can you quote the part of the email that's supposed to be scandalous? The last exchange was this one:



So given the subpoena was for Libya, obviously they'd discuss which ones relate to Libya, since those were the emails requested. The final line is "yes to both" for everything and the Libya stuff.

I guess in right wing land, it's enough to scream EMAIL!!! and that's supposed to be proof of some scandal, like Pavlov's dogs or something.
Click to expand...



I bet those Pavlovian dogs had a better understanding of the concept of context than you do....

FBI discovers deleted work related E-mails
FBI recovers 30 deleted Clinton emails involving Benghazi attack | TheHill
 
Fenton said:
I bet those Pavlovian dogs had a better understanding of the concept of context than you do....
Click to expand...

OK, so you moved the goal posts because that link was a big FAIL. There was nothing even approaching "damning information" in that exchange. "Yes to both" releasing the Libya and ALL the emails is a nothing. Thanks for confirming, although in a back handed way!

FBI discovers deleted work related E-mails
FBI recovers 30 deleted Clinton emails involving Benghazi attack | TheHill
Click to expand...

And then you follow up with another FAIL. From the article:

"Using broad search terms, we have identified approximately 30 documents potentially responsive to a Benghazi-related request," State Department spokesman John Kirby said in a statement. "At this time, we have not confirmed that the documents are, in fact, responsive, or whether they are duplicates of materials already provided to the Department by former Secretary Clinton in December 2014.”
Click to expand...

Again, I guess the idea is if you link something with "Hillary" and "email" we're supposed to conclude FRAUD!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom