Except in this scenario we have just one person accused of rape - Donald Trump, who goes on trial on October 14th.
Trump is accused of rape, and on trial on the 14th of October?
I didn't know that. Cite your source, please.
Why is it not in the news? Why is mainstream media - of all media - ignoring such a juicy news such as this?
The tape video pales in comparison, and yet no one is covering it!
Hmmmmm.....maybe they suspect something you don't? That the accusation stinks, maybe? What with all the timing.....and all...
Maybe the media doesn't want to be seen as blatantly biased, and foolishly gullible?
You are no doubt throwing out the accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist and yet he's never been charged with anything. One person has made the rape accusation against him: Juanita Broaddrick, and no one, least of all the judicial system, has found her claims convincing. I guess you see that as evidence of a liberal conspiracy.
There are also sexual assaults and sexual harrassment against him. Sex assault don't count in your book?
I suppose you and Clinton share the same view as to what having sex is. He says oral sex.....is not sex. It doesn't count. So, sex assaults don't count.
If that's the case......what the heck are you all hysterical about with your claims of sex assault by Trump (and it's just all by talk)? :lol:
Clinton's three lies, according to Starr
By Brooks Jackson/CNN
(Editor's Note: This story contains explicit language.)
WASHINGTON (September 21) -- Independent Counsel Ken Starr says President Bill Clinton's videotaped testimony contains three lies -- three instances of perjury to the federal grand jury.
Lie number one, according to Starr: Oral sex is not sex.
"Is oral sex performed on you within that definition as you understood it?" Clinton was asked during his August 17 testimony, viewed by the public for the first time Monday.
"As I understood it, it was not, no," the president answered.
Lawyers in the Paula Jones sexual harrassment case defined "sexual relations" as engaging in or causing "contact with the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh or buttocks of any person..."
But the president said,"If the deponent is the person who has oral sex performed on him, then the contact is with -- not with anything on that list -- but with the lips of another person."
Starr didn't buy that explanation.
"That testimony is not credible. At the Jones deposition, the president could not have believed he was telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth," the independent counsel wrote to Congress.
The president's lawyers said in rebuttal that oral sex "plainly" falls outside the Jones definition.
Lie number two, alleged by Starr
Clinton's three lies, according to Starr - September 21, 1998
...One person has made the rape accusation against him.....
How very typical that a Christian conservative would be defensive on behalf of an alleged paedophile rapist, provided they are anti-liberal. The hypocrisy is staggering. I wonder how rapidly you'll drop your Trump eulogies if he is defeated in November AND convicted of the rape of a 13-year-old.
If there is anyone who shows massive hypocrisy (if not downright confusion)....it would be the anti-Trumps and Clintonians. Just look at your response! You even seem to think since it's only one accusation of rape for Clinton....therefore, that act couldn't be so bad!
That these women, all through these years, are still out in the open and repeating the same things they've been saying all along....and no one's slapping them with slander/defamation.....speaks a lot!
They're eager to confront Clinton, right to his face! Their rage towards him is very much alive after all these years! That's why they were at the debate - it was a plan to confront him publicly on national tv, but it was thwarted by the debate officers.
But it's suspect though that women who've never said anything before, would come out now to throw accusations at Trump!
The way dirt is being dished out, and so-called evidences are liberally and wilfully taken out of context - just like this taped video - could only make one cynical about the whole process, and career politicians like Clinton seems to be very much at home with it.
I must say, Clinton is quite experienced. For her, it's just another day in politics. Imho.
