• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama used a pseudonym in emails with Clinton, FBI documents reveal

ajn678

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 19, 2016
Messages
8,008
Reaction score
3,445
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Obama used a pseudonym in emails with Clinton, FBI documents reveal

President Barack Obama used a pseudonym in email communications with Hillary Clinton and others, according to FBI records made public Friday.
The disclosure came as the FBI released its second batch of documents from its investigation into Clinton’s private email server during her tenure as secretary of state.
Story Continued Below
The 189 pages the bureau released includes interviews with some of Clinton’s closest aides, such as Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills; senior State Department officials; and even Marcel Lazar, better known as the Romanian hacker “Guccifer.”

So it now looks like even Obama was part of the massive cover up. God knows what will come out of this.
 
I cant help the blind, do a search

You come into the thread I created, discrediting the topic as well as the story. I would expect you could do a simple task of proving it.
 
You come into the thread I created, discrediting the topic as well as the story. I would expect you could do a simple task of proving it.

You got typing skills? Use em
 
There is already a thread covering the topic. Most of which has been thoroughly proven to be false. Your kinda late, the train already left.

Common courtesy is to link to the other thread when making the claim.
 
You got typing skills? Use em

Just read the thread. Nowhere has any of it been "proven false". Also, the thread wasn't in Breaking News. I'll keep this here. And I suggest you start asking for money from CTR, because you surely had a quick, false reply. They pay mightily for that.
 
Just read the thread. Nowhere has any of it been "proven false". Also, the thread wasn't in Breaking News. I'll keep this here. And I suggest you start asking for money from CTR, because you surely had a quick, false reply. They pay mightily for that.

And your telling me this why?
 
And your telling me this why?

You came into this thread. You began to discredit it, saying there was already a topic on the subject and it had been proven false. It hasn't been. I then suggested if you weren't already being paid for lying, you should talk to CTR so that you can make some profit for covering up for politicians.
 
First of all, the FBI report uses the phrase "believed to be pseudonym used by the president," and Politico's headline, ever the online rag that it is, reports it as if its definite. But even if it is true, do Obamahaters really think he'd sign his emails: "Barack Obama, President of the United States," do you? And if he did, would you think that have been a smart thing to do? If either or both of the answers to those questions are "yes," then you people are even more deranged than I thought (and I already thought that would be an impossibility).
 
Let me guess what the pseudonym was.

"Incompetent" - that way those who Obama corresponded with, would instantly know who he was.
 
First of all, the FBI report uses the phrase "believed to be pseudonym used by the president," and Politico's headline, ever the online rag that it is, reports it as if its definite. But even if it is true, do Obamahaters really think he'd sign his emails: "Barack Obama, President of the United States," do you? And if he did, would you think that have been a smart thing to do? If either or both of the answers to those questions are "yes," then you people are even more deranged than I thought (and I already thought that would be an impossibility).

The story is that Obama lied about knowing Clinton had a personal email server. I don't care if he made a yahoo account with a name John Smith. He knew she had a personal email server, and he lied about it when it came up.
 
The story is that Obama lied about knowing Clinton had a personal email server. I don't care if he made a yahoo account with a name John Smith. He knew she had a personal email server, and he lied about it when it came up.

Nope. Here's what he said (through his spox) in March 2015:

“They did have the occasion to email one another. … He was not aware of the details of how that email address and how that server had been set up or how Secretary Clinton and her team were planning to comply with the Federal Records Act,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters. “The president did email with Secretary Clinton. I assume he recognized the email he was emailing back to.”
 
That would explain the size of the cover up.

You need to put "cover up" in quotes to be accurate, like this: "cover up." That way it indicates that it's just another false accusation of a "cover up" by rightwing Clintonhating Obamahaters.
 
You need to put "cover up" in quotes to be accurate, like this: "cover up." That way it indicates that it's just another false accusation of a "cover up" by rightwing Clintonhating Obamahaters.

Now why does it not surprise me that you would say that?
 
That's what the usual suspects all say.

Just as the usual suspects shout "cover up" when there isn't any. *


* see: false claims of "cover up" Benghazi, Emails
 
Back
Top Bottom