• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Asking How To Destroy Evidence!

Harry Guerrilla

Harry Guerrilla

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
28,951
Reaction score
12,422
Location
Not affiliated with other libertarians.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Paul Combetta, an IT specialist who helped Hillary Clinton wipe her server clean of evidence requested from federal authorities, took to online forums to find advice on how to commit the crime.


Combetta cited his Fifth Amendment rights in refusing to answer questions before a congressional committee last week, but was pretty talkative when trying to find out information from fellow IT experts on how to forge Clinton’s e-mails.


Under a posting on 8chan titled “Here is clear proof that Hillary sought to destroy evidence,” Combetta can be seen posting under a username he uses multiple times across multiple platforms, ‘stonetear.’
In a screenshot of the discussion, Combetta (or stonetear) can be seen telling others “I need to strip out a VIP’s (VERY VIP) email address from a bunch of archived emails.”
Presumably, that VIP would be Secretary of State Clinton.
Click to expand...
BOMBSHELL: Hillary's IT Guy Caught Asking How To Destroy Evidence!

Uh oh, this may be bad.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
Uh oh, this may be bad.
Click to expand...

Worse for him than her, though it sounds like maybe he just wanted to remove the email address(es) she was using while maintaining the contents of the email. Not sure really based on the article. I doubt Hillary was particularly tech savvy so a lot of this may have been him and possibly other staff people conspiring and not Hillary directly. May be why he refuses to testify even with qualified immunity.
 
SMTA said:
Anybody that stupid deserves to get hammered.
Click to expand...

The guy may or may not have known that this was highly illegal.
With that said, he's in trouble because his reddit name is linked right back to him.

A "citizen journalist" found all this out.
When this broke this morning, his posts from 2 years ago started magically disappearing.
They're all archived though.
 
If only....he was probably talking about some 'other' VIP. :roll:
 
The Political Insider reports on a "citizen journalist" who saw a username.

Seriously, people? These are the sources and evidence we accept these days? Laughable.

This is the depth to which "email scandal" fanatics have sunk?
 
ecofarm said:
The Political Insider reports on a "citizen journalist" who saw a username.

Seriously, people? These are the sources and evidence we accept these days? Laughable.

This is the depth to which "email scandal" fanatics have sunk?
Click to expand...

I'm not going to link all the information here, because it would violate forum rules.
This guys username is connected to his rl address, pictures, etc.

He was asking how to strip email addresses out of an online database, the day after HRC sent her emails to her lawyer.
Multiple government representatives have been contacted over this, because it is actually real.

Don't like the source, hunt for a better one.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
I'm not going to link all the information here, because it would violate forum rules.
This guys username is connected to his rl address, pictures, etc.
Click to expand...

According to reedit. But anyone could have used that user name on 8chan, right?

He was asking how to strip email addresses out of an online database, the day after HRC sent her emails to her lawyer.
Click to expand...

According to a "citizen journalist" who supposedly saw a username, and there is no public record to confirm this. But we're supposed to trust an anonymous "citizen journalist" that his claims about someone using that username can be confirmed via the private logs of the website.

Multiple government representatives have been contacted over this, because it is actually real.
Click to expand...

I can contact multiple government representatives about the unicorn in my yard, because it is actually real?

Don't like the source, hunt for a better one.
Click to expand...

So now the burden of proof, for your claim, is on others?


There is no way you would accept such a ridiculous claim against the candidate you support. Be honest with yourself. This article is a pie of crap and one must possess a staggering level of confirmation bias to take it seriously.
 
ecofarm said:
According to reedit. But anyone could have used that user name on 8chan, right?



According to a "citizen journalist" who supposedly saw a username, and there is no public record to confirm this. But we're supposed to trust an anonymous "citizen journalist" that his claims about someone using that username can be confirmed via the private logs of the website.



I can contact multiple government representatives about the unicorn in my yard, because it is actually real?



So now the burden of proof, for your claim, is on others?


There is no way you would accept such a ridiculous claim against the candidate you support. Be honest with yourself. This article is a pie of crap and one must possess a staggering level of confirmation bias to take it seriously.
Click to expand...

There you go, happy?

God, you're insufferable now.

Paul Combetta, Computer Specialist Who Deleted Hillary Clinton Emails, May Have Asked Reddit for Tips | US News
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
There you go, happy?

God, you're insufferable now.
Click to expand...

Don't cry too much.

Paul Combetta, Computer Specialist Who Deleted Hillary Clinton Emails, May Have Asked Reddit for Tips | US News
Click to expand...

"May Have"

What happened to 8chan and the websites logs that will prove it?

Notice the difference in USNews' title? They're just reporting on the rumor created by a "citizen journalist".

That's not proof. That's just a mainstream source reporting on the rumor.
 
ecofarm said:
According to reedit. But anyone could have used that user name on 8chan, right?



According to a "citizen journalist" who supposedly saw a username, and there is no public record to confirm this. But we're supposed to trust an anonymous "citizen journalist" that his claims about someone using that username can be confirmed via the private logs of the website.



I can contact multiple government representatives about the unicorn in my yard, because it is actually real?



So now the burden of proof, for your claim, is on others?


There is no way you would accept such a ridiculous claim against the candidate you support. Be honest with yourself. This article is a pie of crap and one must possess a staggering level of confirmation bias to take it seriously.
Click to expand...

I would trust a "citizen journalist" more than an actual journalist. Fiction and fantasy is the new journalism when it comes to the MSM.
 
ecofarm said:
Don't cry too much.



"May Have"

Notice the difference in USNews' title? They're just reporting on the rumor created by a "citizen journalist".

That's not proof. That's just a mainstream source reporting on the rumor.
Click to expand...

Go start a thread on White privilege, it'll make you feel better.
If you bother to read the OP, I said "it may be bad."
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
Go start a thread on White privilege, it'll make you feel better.
If you bother to read the OP, I said "it may be bad."
Click to expand...

So now you're gonna throw a racist fit.

Impressive.
 
reinoe said:
I would trust a "citizen journalist" more than an actual journalist. Fiction and fantasy is the new journalism when it comes to the MSM.
Click to expand...

conspiracy_truthisoutthere.jpg
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
What happened to you, you used to be cool.
Click to expand...

You're gonna make me sad.

On second thought, I agree with you, Harry. We should take the word of a "citizen journalist" that they saw stuff on 8chan that has been deleted and the username was the username used by someone else.

Gather a lynch mob!



You should be ashamed.
 
TheGoverness said:
Wow. I don't know what else to say.
Click to expand...

I dunno if it's really clear, but I'll try to explain from what I've learned about it.

Apparently this guy was asking how to sanitize emails for a "very VIP" client by changing the email address.
You can't do it though because that's apparently illegal.

This guy happens to be the one who was supposed to testify before congress, but didn't show up.
If I understand correctly, these alleged emails were supposed to be deleted.
 
ecofarm said:
You're gonna make me sad.

On second thought, I agree with you, Harry. We should take the word of a "citizen journalist" that they saw stuff on 8chan that has been deleted and the username was the username used by someone else.

Gather a lynch mob!



You should be ashamed.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry I was an ass.
I think this story is important, because of the evidence collected may indeed reveal the truth.
At the moment there is no clear picture and I do not know what will happen.

I think it could be bad for this particular guy, because altering emails after the fact is illegal.
 
ecofarm said:
The Political Insider reports on a "citizen journalist" who saw a username.

Seriously, people? These are the sources and evidence we accept these days? Laughable.

This is the depth to which "email scandal" fanatics have sunk?
Click to expand...

First Benghazi was no big deal and now the email thing is just for "fanatics". I'd think you'd have to be a Hillary fanatic to want to turn blind eye to all her honesty issues.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
I dunno if it's really clear, but I'll try to explain from what I've learned about it.

Apparently this guy was asking how to sanitize emails for a "very VIP" client by changing the email address.
You can't do it though because that's apparently illegal.

This guy happens to be the one who was supposed to testify before congress, but didn't show up.
If I understand correctly, these alleged emails were supposed to be deleted.
Click to expand...

If this is in fact all true, then this is pretty damming.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom