• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Clinton camp wants FBI interview files released to the public

The part that the FBI cannot release it, yes, it's federal law and I've run up against that before when trying to get a client paid for work done for the Feds, and they we couldn't get any official FBI interviews released involving anyone else other than my guy, even though my guy was in the right, and the FBI investigation proved so. We got a copy of the official FBI conclusion and recommendation to the US Attorney's Office, just as the FBI posted the Clinton conclusion and recommendation of the web after being read at a press conference. The rest of my post is my personal opinion.

So if your guy could request the FBI release his interview ....then why can't Clinton request that hers be released as well? I think people can request their own interviews and records released but because of privacy laws they can't request other people interviews released without their permission.
 
So if your guy could request the FBI release his interview ....then why can't Clinton request that hers be released as well? I think people can request their own interviews and records released but because of privacy laws they can't request other people interviews released without their permission.

What? Did you read my posts in this thread? I'm sorry, but I don't think I understand what your saying, but I think you understand what I was talking about, because you kinda repeated parts of it. But, I'll try to respond - I didn't talk about releasing anything but Hillary's interview, and it would have to be done through her attorneys. She can get her testimony in the interview released, through her attorneys, if the case is not moving forward against her, and her attorneys submit the proper motion and request.

So, that's exactly what I was getting at - if she really, truly, and honestly, wanted her interview disclosed, it could be done by and through her attorney's, after any classified portions were redacted. Her going on TV herself, or being quoted in print, or having her surrogates say that she wants them released is like going on TV and saying you want your taxes released by the IRS - it doesn't work that way. You have to be the one to release your taxes, and you have to be the one to release the transcript of an FBI interview that has been redacted and approved by the FBI.

Again, if she wanted them released to the public, she could make it happen - but she obviously doesn't, because she obviously hasn't done it herself. In other words she, again, is lying in an attempt to make herself look like some sort of victim. The Clinton's are masters at doing that. World class masters.
 
Last edited:
"Unnamed sources" have been abused to manufacture lies against Hillary.

The problem with Hillary denying the allegations is that some people will trust "unnamed sources" over Hillary if those "unnamed sources" tell them what they want to hear and Hillary does not.

Now, you are claiming that Hillary should use only her own credibility against unsubstantiated rumors. Of course, this is ridiculous.

So you're one of the 11 percenters?

NBC Poll: Only 11 Percent Think Hillary Is Honest and Trustworthy - Breitbart
 
Back
Top Bottom