• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary is dealing with mounting health issues, new book claims

Top Cat said:
Now there's an unbiased reporter! Biggest hack on TV.
Click to expand...

Well, I guess we might as well trust Little Green footballs, then. You down widdat?
 
Ooooh, another Edward Klein "book." Here's some criticisms of his past "work":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Klein#Criticism

Klein has been criticized for his biography of Hillary Clinton, titled, The Truth About Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She'll Go to Become President, which was released on June 21, 2005. Politico criticized the book for "serious factual errors, truncated and distorted quotes and overall themes [that] don't gibe with any other serious accounts of Clinton's life."[9] The book was attacked not only by liberals, but by a neoconservative as well. John Podhoretz wrote in the New York Post, "Thirty pages into it, I wanted to take a shower. Sixty pages into it, I wanted to be decontaminated. And 200 pages into it, I wanted someone to drive stakes through my eyes so I wouldn't have to suffer through another word."[10] In National Review James Geraghty wrote, “Folks, there are plenty of arguments against Hillary Clinton, her policies, her views, her proposals, and her philosophies. This stuff ain’t it. Nobody on the right, left, or center ought to stoop to this level.”[11]

Kathryn Jean Lopez of National Review asked Klein in a June 20, 2005 interview, "Why on earth would you put such a terrible story in your book...that looks to be flimsily sourced at that?," regarding his suggestion that Chelsea Clinton was conceived in an act of marital rape.[12] Facing criticism from both the left and right for making the claim, Klein eventually backed away from the insinuation in an interview with radio host Jim Bohannon on June 23, 2005[13]

The British newspaper The Guardian pointed out a number of verifiable factual errors in Klein's 2014 book Blood Feud.[14]
Click to expand...
 
Top Cat said:
Of course you think it's a concern. You WANT her to be in bad health.
Click to expand...

Duh! But your own hatred and wishing ill of Trump doesn't prevent you from picking every little nit you can find. This is what it looks like when someone else does it.
 
Top Cat said:
Now there's an unbiased reporter! Biggest hack on TV.
Click to expand...

Which one is the reporter? Hannity or the Doctor?

I don't watch Fox, but it's my understanding that Hannity is a commentator. Not a reporter. I assume the Doctor is just a doctor.
 
Top Cat said:
Show me where I wished evil on Trump. I'll wait.
Click to expand...

I wish that every single day, about ten pounds of Tiger diahhrea materializes about 5 feet above his head while he intends to stand still.



I wouldn't classify that as evil. Just the tiniest stab at karmic justice.
 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1066191704 said:
View attachment 67205595
Click to expand...

Oh my goodness! Clearly one still photo of a 68-year-old woman in heels being briefly assisted up some stairs is ironclad proof that she is an invalid and therefore is unfit for office!

The RWNJ hackery simply abounds in this thread.
 
Kobie said:
Oh my goodness! Clearly one still photo of a 68-year-old woman in heels being briefly assisted up some stairs is ironclad proof that she is an invalid and therefore is unfit for office!

The RWNJ hackery simply abounds in this thread.
Click to expand...

The Hillary slurpers can't accept their candidate is most likely too old and maybe too ill to withstand the stress associated with being president.
 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1066191744 said:
The Hillary slurpers can't accept their candidate is most likely too old
Click to expand...

She's younger than Donald Trump by about two years. You are embarrassing yourself.

Μολὼν λαβέ;1066191744 said:
and maybe too ill to withstand the stress associated with being president.
Click to expand...

If there were actual evidence that she was "too ill" -- evidence not gleaned from right-wing blogs jumping to moronic conclusions based on six-month-old still photographs of her FROM BEHIND -- then maybe it would be taken seriously. Yanno, evidence from actual doctors who have actually examined her.

It's also funny that you've pre-emptively declared anyone who doesn't take this tripe seriously to be a "Hillary slurper." You fail internet forever.
 
Top Cat said:
Of course you think it's a concern. You WANT her to be in bad health.
Click to expand...

I wish we were somewhere where I could express myself properly about that bull**** statement.
 
coldjoint said:
I don't like the choices either, but Trump seems remarkably fit for his age.
Click to expand...

The 70-year-old Pillsbury Dough Boy? If you say so, I guess.
 
MrPeanut said:
Well yes, but I never said anything about cancer. I was talking in generalities. I don't believe that Hillary or Trump have cancer.
Click to expand...

Nice deflection.
 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1066191754 said:
Just what the US needs in a president...
Click to expand...

Better than an thin-skinned, pretty boy with a stick up his ass.
 
Mycroft said:
I don't know if these two letters are genuine, but if they are we have a serious problem on our hands if Hillary is elected President.


View attachment 67205568


View attachment 67205569
Click to expand...

Whoa!
I've speculated about likely health problems just from things that can be observed but I never expected to see that kind of clear evidence ... and a year apart so it can't be blamed on a brief effect of her concussion.
This is some serious ****.
 
Kobie said:
She's younger than Donald Trump by about two years. You are embarrassing yourself.



If there were actual evidence that she was "too ill" -- evidence not gleaned from right-wing blogs jumping to moronic conclusions based on six-month-old still photographs of her FROM BEHIND -- then maybe it would be taken seriously. Yanno, evidence from actual doctors who have actually examined her.

It's also funny that you've pre-emptively declared anyone who doesn't take this tripe seriously to be a "Hillary slurper." You fail internet forever.
Click to expand...

What fails is your rationale to defend, as usual BTW. Keep on slurpin...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom