I take exception to your conclusion. I was not avoiding Trumps error. In fact my posts made no attempt to deny it. There was no Red Herring. The purpose was to show that people speaking in public make mistakes. Donald trump made an "error". As a result of this error, the suggestion offered inn the OP was this:
"We have two options... either he doesn't know there aren't 12 articles.... or he really cares about protecting how we elect presidents.. This man is a buffoon."
The video I posted was of the President of the United states campaigning and claiming there were 57 states. I have every confidence the President knows there are only 50 states, yet he misspoke, didn't he? Does that mean he has no clue there are only 50 states? Does that mean he had some future plans to add 7 states during his Presidency? Does that mean he is a buffoon?
It has become the tactic to take simple, innocent moments like the one contained in the OP, and drape them across the internet as evidence of something that only the most regimented can get excited about.
So I suggest I KNOW how DEBATE works. I've explained why I felt the post properly countered the OP.