• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gay Pride Parade to march through muslim streets

I would think so. Friends in NYC and Munich were at some 2 or three sex partners a week. That would probably decrease with age, but they certainly were meeting a lot of bi-sexuals and gays, while it lasted.

How typical you'd reduce the social life of an LGBT person to nothing more than their sexual activity. When you say you 'met' someone, should we all take that to mean you had sex with them?
 
Did I say beat the crap out of anyone? No. I said 2000 plus bad ass women eating bacon and munching sausage patties (I forgot to add that part) and march through their own city and take it BACK because they are FED UP being groped, raped, abused, attacked just because they are women. And if one of the lowlifes touches just ONE of them, THEN beat the crap out of any that decide to back his sorry ass. Enough is enough. They only understand one thing. So show them they CANNOT go to a host country and abuse it's female citizens.

Earlier, I read a story about a 14 year old girl that was raped. She got punished for it. 100 lashes. She died after the 70th lash. And these same guys that did this to her are all over Germany now. So you bet your ass I want a bunch of grown women with some biceps to go marching down one of their streets and have protection if the cowards decide they need punishment too.

You're fine, Enola. There are plenty of people sick of extremist Islamic intolerance and violence and won't condemn you for being sick of it. There are even some who condemn the actual murderer in that Florida nightclub rather than the gun itself. Then you have folks whose knee jerk reaction is to justify and explain anything having to with Islam away. Seems you've happened upon a few of those folks. What can I say? They're all over. ;)
 
Last edited:
I was using the word as a verb. To perv - to watch in a lewd, lustful manner.

You arguing only heteros are pervs because gay people could never be, right? :lol:
 
if he did it in fallujah or kabul i might have some respect for him but a swedish muslim ghetto? do those even exist?

Dude, get a clue. You don't know about the Muslims in Sweden? Have you not been watching the news?

_86621646_7e2129bd-54cb-4f6e-a8a7-8d3d6eebd842.jpg
 
This might end poorly.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
 
You arguing only heteros are pervs because gay people could never be, right? :lol:

You obviously haven't come across that use of the word, have you? Everyone does a bit of perving from time to time, I know I have.
 
How typical you'd reduce the social life of an LGBT person to nothing more than their sexual activity. When you say you 'met' someone, should we all take that to mean you had sex with them?

I would say that probably I met the people I had sex with, though, there were many I met, with whom I had no sex.

But when you say "when you've lived an active, openly gay life for 35 years, you do get to meet quite a lot of LGBT people" then you must admit, that alone the sex contacts among the LGBT community would be very large indeed, if you were as active as my LGBT friends were. Just do a quick calc.
 
I would say that probably I met the people I had sex with, though, there were many I met, with whom I had no sex.

But when you say "when you've lived an active, openly gay life for 35 years, you do get to meet quite a lot of LGBT people" then you must admit, that alone the sex contacts among the LGBT community would be very large indeed, if you were as active as my LGBT friends were. Just do a quick calc.

Once again, your prejudice prevents you from reading words like 'active', 'meet', 'gay' and not instantly reduce everything to a matter of sex.
 
The idea of walking in areas of potential tension for two groups is a time-honored Leftwing and Rightwing populist proposition. They can vary in their virtuousness, but it's a potential for "meaningful" symbolic dialogue.

The problem with Milo is that he is less interested in making good points or advancing his causes than he is building up a cult following under his internet persona.
 
The problem with Milo is that he is less interested in making good points or advancing his causes than he is building up a cult following under his internet persona.

You got that right. He's not an ideologue, he's a wannabe demagogue, modelling himself on Geert Wilders.
 
Strange you felt you had to tell us that. How many non-hetero men get their pervs fantasising about good-looking lesbians, do you think?

I do. I fantasize about good-looking lesbians quite a lot. :)
 
I wrote "How many non-hetero men..."

But I'm fairly sure you're not a man. Amirite?

Oh, then I must've misread it. When you wrote non-hetero men, I thought I was included in that because I'm not a non-hetero man.

But my point still stands, I guess.
 
Last edited:
I do. I fantasize about good-looking lesbians quite a lot. :)

You would love my lesbian neighbors a few houses down from me. I have to look away when the wife is out front with me and they are doing yard work because............. errr ummm ahhhh.....you get the point.
 
Once again, your prejudice prevents you from reading words like 'active', 'meet', 'gay' and not instantly reduce everything to a matter of sex.

Oh, you didn't read it exactly. I did and even mentioned the difference.
 
I have no clue who this guy is. But I love his CONCEPT. I hope he does it.

He's a right-wing gay activist, who's sort of an internet personality. I like him, but some of his positions I do vehemently disagree with him on.
 
You got that right. He's not an ideologue, he's a wannabe demagogue, modelling himself on Geert Wilders.

Among the rather dull tropes he's utilized, he's also said interesting things. Saying interesting things can often lead to being worthwhile. Milo's problem is that even with those interesting things, those things have been better covered by others.

That leaves mediocrity and cheap stunts in its wake, which propels me to ask that people read other people instead.
 
Dude, get a clue. You don't know about the Muslims in Sweden? Have you not been watching the news?

_86621646_7e2129bd-54cb-4f6e-a8a7-8d3d6eebd842.jpg


Yeah I read that and thought to myself, huh? Sweden is currently deporting over 140 thousand of their so called refugees due to bad behavior and such. or was it Finland? Anywho, it was one of the Scandinavian nations.

Tim-
 
I have no clue who this guy is. But I love his CONCEPT. I hope he does it.

He works at Breitbart. He gained notoriety mostly from Twitter and his college campus speech tour.
 
Dude, get a clue. You don't know about the Muslims in Sweden? Have you not been watching the news?

_86621646_7e2129bd-54cb-4f6e-a8a7-8d3d6eebd842.jpg

Yeah, but it is fairly remarkable that the socialist's advertised paradise would even admit to having any sort of ghetto, much less a Muslim one.
 
Yiannopoulos is a self-hating, everyone-hating, far-right bigot. He represents no one but himself and his Breitbart groupies. Why are people taking any notice of him? Because he says things that allow the right-wing media to co-opt LGBT people into their crusade against Islam. Talk to any representative of genuine LGBT organisations and you'll see how much our communities reject the race and religious hatred that the likes of Yiannopoulos spout.

Loving the Geert Wilders bad bleaching though. And the inch-thick foundation.

"this guy doesn't blindly follow every single officially LGBTQKGJUENCHGD approved idea, so we all hate him."
 
Dude, get a clue. You don't know about the Muslims in Sweden? Have you not been watching the news?

_86621646_7e2129bd-54cb-4f6e-a8a7-8d3d6eebd842.jpg

I hear that there are a lot of Muslim nations with really big piles of money and the Q'ran teaches that charity is the 3rd pillar of Islam, so why aren't the Muslims in the countries with great big piles of money helping these folks out?? Why aren't there Muslim outreaches helping them rise above the poverty?? Why aren't there Muslim charities building nice homes for these people and providing them with jobs/income??


The Third Pillar of Islam: Compulsory Charity - The Religion of Islam
Charity is not just recommended by Islam, it is required of every financially stable Muslim. Giving charity to those who deserve it is part of Muslim character and one of the Five Pillars of Islamic practice. Zakat is viewed as "compulsory charity"; it is an obligation for those who have received their wealth from God to respond to those members of the community in need. Devoid of sentiments of universal love, some people know only to hoard wealth and to add to it by lending it out on interest. Islam’s teachings are the very antithesis of this attitude. Islam encourages the sharing of wealth with others and helps people to stand on their own and become productive members of the society.

In Arabic it is known as zakat which literally means "purification", because zakat is considered to purify one’s heart of greed. Love of wealth is natural and it takes firm belief in God for a person to part with some of his wealth. Zakat must be paid on different categories of property — gold, silver, money; livestock; agricultural produce; and business commodities — and is payable each year after one year’s possession. It requires an annual contribution of 2.5 percent of an individual’s wealth and assets.
 
You would love my lesbian neighbors a few houses down from me. I have to look away when the wife is out front with me and they are doing yard work because............. errr ummm ahhhh.....you get the point.

Our neighborhood lesbians just moved out. Sad to see them leave. Dog-lovers, beer-drinkers, nice young ladies who were a positive on our little corner. Not political, not pushy, as respectful of us as we were respectful of them. The fact that they were lesbians never entered the conversation, outside of being referred to as "The Girls" (a term that made them smile as well).
 
Our neighborhood lesbians just moved out. Sad to see them leave. Dog-lovers, beer-drinkers, nice young ladies who were a positive on our little corner. Not political, not pushy, as respectful of us as we were respectful of them. The fact that they were lesbians never entered the conversation, outside of being referred to as "The Girls" (a term that made them smile as well).

Thats funny.... I call them "the girls" Never drank with them, but they are funny as hell to talk with. Good peeps.
 
Me? I am waiting for the lesbian parade that only allows good looking women. I would watch a video of that one.

As for the OP - good for them. It takes guts to not play it safe. And they are not hurting anyone. So power to them.

Now about those good-looking lesbians... ;)


Btw - I am a hetero man.

I am pretty sure that hot lesbians are a myth that only exist in porn.
 
Back
Top Bottom