• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dan Rather on Trump

Trump attacks the press because they (occasionally) ask him an actual policy question, and (occasionally) point out that the conspiracy garbage that trips from his mouth is incorrect.

For Trump, "Sucks" = "Not Nice To Me"


That being said, Rather isn't all that great of a spokesperson for this, given his hand in the continuing slide of our media as an institution. The media does suck, but it sucks because it is willing to bend fact to meet preferred narratives, and willing to do enormous damage to the country in search of ratings.

As usual you underestimate Trump by a wide margin. How many times does he need to win before you smell the coffee?
 
Trump is wrong and Rather has the documents to prove it.
 
Rather trying to defend the press against Trumps charge that they suck is hilarious:



So great, I too am a firm defender of the press, democracy cant work without a free flow of information which include competent journalists who get paid somehow, and who have ways to get their work to the people. The problem is that they have long sucked, and neither they nor their bosses show any willingness to do what it takes for America to have a sound 4th estate, despite Rathers expostulations to the contrary.

This coming from a scumbag who tried, against the advice of all the CBS lawyers involved, to swing a presidential election in its dying days.

He is the Poster Child of The Corrupt Media.

Luckily the Internet was alive, and did the job journ-O-lists would never have done... And exposed Dan Rather's Fraud.
 
Trump attacks the press because they (occasionally) ask him an actual policy question, and (occasionally) point out that the conspiracy garbage that trips from his mouth is incorrect.

For Trump, "Sucks" = "Not Nice To Me"


That being said, Rather isn't all that great of a spokesperson for this, given his hand in the continuing slide of our media as an institution. The media does suck, but it sucks because it is willing to bend fact to meet preferred narratives, and willing to do enormous damage to the country in search of ratings.

Trump exposed how the Goebbels Media works... And when he does this, a few things happen:

1. People who know how The Goebbels Media slants things in favor of The Socialists of Amerika Partei (SAPs) stand up and cheer... And it strengthens their support of Trump.

2. Some folks finally learn... have their eyes opened to the truth about how the Goebbels media deals dirty.

3. The Goebbels Media realizes it can't get away with their BS with this guy, as they'll be called on it... Publicly. It just might reduce the lies... But not likely.

The Kool-Aid Leftists will whine... That's expected. They see their Propaganda Machine taking a hit, and instead of addressing and admitting the fact they are Propagandists, the Kool-Aid Leftists do exactly what you just did... And feebly blame Trump for responding to blatant misrepresentations.

You've joined an odd lot... It's long past due someone stood up to this perversion... had Romney, McCain or Bush 43 done it... We wouldn't have had 8-years of the incompetent called Obama.
 
Last edited:
Trump exposed how the Goebbels Media works... And when he does this, a few things happen:

[emoji38] Trump didn't expose ****. Trump was playing footsie with all those folks when actual conservatives were making the car about media bias. All Trump has done is whine about people who didn't enable him. But because it's cathartic to hear someone attack a person or institution you dislike, you identify with and cheer it on. Rich Lowry's article today had you down pat.

1. People who know how The Goebbels Media slants things in favor of The Socialists of Amerika Partei (SAPs)

That would be the party that believes in Single Payer Healthcare, raising taxes on the rich, raising the minimum wage, restricting the First Amendment, restructuring the Second Amendment, and refuses to reform entitlements? That party?

Didn't their nominee suggest they be The Workers Party a few days ago? Yup. Definite shades of socialism.

2. Some folks finally learn... have their eyes opened to the truth about how the Goebbels media deals dirty.

The only thing we've learned this cycle is that they will sacrifice their bias for ratings in a GOP primary.

3. The Goebbels Media realizes it can't get away with their BS with this guy, as they'll be called on it... Publicly. It just might reduce the lies... But not likely.

Yeah. I doubt being accused of being a meanie by a serial liar whom they are now free to destroy is all that worrisome.

You've joined an odd lot...

Conservatives who actually mean it? Yeah. It's a smaller portion of the GOP than we knew.

It's long past due someone stood up to this perversion... had Romney, McCain or Bush 43 done it... We wouldn't have had 8-years of the incompetent called Obama.

:lamo :lamo :lamo


Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
 
Why are anyone of us acting as though Dan Rather is a good/honest/honorable actor in the 4th estate?

His version of ethics is blatantly biased. If Rather were just as eager to follow stories on liberal sacred cows, his opinions would matter.
 
Conservatives who actually mean it? Yeah. It's a smaller portion of the GOP than we knew.

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk

More like conservatives that have double standards towards party voting. How many times were Republicans told to hold our noses and vote for the establishment candidate?

Conservatives that believe in do as I say, not as I do. Examine that.
 
Dan Rather defending honesty in the press?...LMAO!
 
More like conservatives that have double standards towards party voting. How many times were Republicans told to hold our noses and vote for the establishment candidate?

Conservatives that believe in do as I say, not as I do. Examine that.

LOL, the much-ballyhoo'd "Establishment" is rallying behind Trump, who is far more liberal and distasteful than a Romney, McCain, or Dole. It's the Constitutionalists and Ideological Conservatives who make up the #NeverTrump ranks.

But please :) show me my double standard. I can show you LOTS of double standards and hypocrisy among those who spent years (decades) claiming to be conservatives, only to fall in behind a liberal big-government authoritarian. We could trade!

I'll go first: Republicans spent the last three decades claiming that Character Mattered and Adultery Was Bad, and are now lining up to support a thrice-divorced serial liar and adulterer who BRAGS about sleeping with other men's wives, is apparently guilty of fraud, mocks POW's and the disabled, and would be the first POTUS to own a strip club. Now you go! :).

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
 
Dan Rather's career was evaporated in one moment when he failed to adequately fact check a report. That incident happened in a day and age few of us can now fathom: when honesty in the public eye was so important and exalted that the most momentary lapse in vigilance could destroy a man's reputation forever. Frankly, that concept is now such an anachronism that even thinking about it is akin to hearing grand-pa talk about the days of the Dust Bowls. If the standard that destroyed Dan Rather was still in place today, Trump would be dragged screaming by demons into the deepest circles of hell.
 
When a Comedian who hosts a fake news program is chosen as the most Trusted News Anchor then the media sucks at their jobs. It's that simple.

When the comedian tells the truth, that is when to start getting your news from the Comedy Channel, and your comedy from FOX News.
 
As usual you underestimate Trump by a wide margin. How many times does he need to win before you smell the coffee?
You appear to be confusing the idea that I have underestimated Trump with the reality that I overestimated the electorate.

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
 
Rather trying to defend the press against Trumps charge that they suck is hilarious:



So great, I too am a firm defender of the press, democracy cant work without a free flow of information which include competent journalists who get paid somehow, and who have ways to get their work to the people. The problem is that they have long sucked, and neither they nor their bosses show any willingness to do what it takes for America to have a sound 4th estate, despite Rathers expostulations to the contrary.

that's exactly how I feel. I notice Rather didn't say anything about due diligence of journalists in finding out if what they are alleging or printing is true and honest.
 
Rather trying to defend the press against Trumps charge that they suck is hilarious:



So great, I too am a firm defender of the press, democracy cant work without a free flow of information which include competent journalists who get paid somehow, and who have ways to get their work to the people. The problem is that they have long sucked, and neither they nor their bosses show any willingness to do what it takes for America to have a sound 4th estate, despite Rathers expostulations to the contrary.

Wow. Someone needs to bring thisto Dan Rathers' attention.
 
Back
Top Bottom