Final Benghazi report from Congress to be ready before summer

Mr Person said:

I'm pretty sure that everything that happened to Libby happened under the Bush admin. Therefore, it could not have been an example of an R not being prosecuted by an R admin, but being prosecuted on order of a newly elected D admin.

Click to expand...

Gaugingcatenate said:

Libby prosecuted under the Obama administration, are you joking? Do you know how to google? Libby resigned from his government positions hours after his indictment on October 28, 2005... pure GWBush era.

Click to expand...

Well, if you're so committed to attacking Hillary that you aren't even reading what I'm typing before responding to it....



Anyway, I do have to say that in general, it is rather amusing to me that pretty much every single conservative who is incensed over the Clinton emails seems to have a different version of facts.

And no one seems to have yet cited specific known facts (or if they have, it's not clear who is telling the truth because everyone is citing somewhat different facts in claiming that Clinton is guilty), specific laws these facts indicate a violation of, or even better, a case holding that similar acts committed by another person in close enough circumstances were in fact criminal.

I'm going to wait for the FBI and AG. But then, I'm not so committed to attacking Hillary as to assume that they must be protecting her.

Mr Person said:

Well, if you're so committed to attacking Hillary that you aren't even reading what I'm typing before responding to it....



Anyway, I do have to say that in general, it is rather amusing to me that pretty much every single conservative who is incensed over the Clinton emails seems to have a different version of facts.

And no one seems to have yet cited specific known facts (or if they have, it's not clear who is telling the truth because everyone is citing somewhat different facts in claiming that Clinton is guilty), specific laws these facts indicate a violation of, or even better, a case holding that similar acts committed by another person in close enough circumstances were in fact criminal.

I'm going to wait for the FBI and AG. But then, I'm not so committed to attacking Hillary as to assume that they must be protecting her.

Click to expand...

I read it, its just so convoluted its hard to see where you were going with that. Could be interpreted a couple of ways... needless to say, prosecutions of administration officials went on under the same administration. Got that?

You are deflecting and avoiding as you know you are wrong. The evidence clearly points to a major violation of the law, Hillary was fully apprised of that law, and truly, she has painted herself into a corner. You can deny it, deflect it, ignore it... but if you were not a partisan and were making a valid attempt to be intellectually honest, you, too, would be for putting her on trial.

And if we all had the exact same citing of the facts, you would pawn that off as us all being in alliance and having R talking points. Cannot have it both ways, yano.

Gaugingcatenate said:

I read it, its just so convoluted its hard to see where you were going with that. Could be interpreted a couple of ways...

Click to expand...

I said "Bush". You claimed I said "Obama".

I hoped it was an accident that derived from your desire to attack Hillary, buuuuuut perhaps it was just dishonesty. Let's read more.

Gaugingcatenate said:

The evidence clearly points to a major violation of the law, Hillary was fully apprised of that law, and truly, she has painted herself into a corner. You can deny it, deflect it, ignore it... but if you were not a partisan and were making a valid attempt to be intellectually honest, you, too, would be for putting her on trial..

Click to expand...

Waiting for the FBI and AG is "partisan"?

Not being convinced to demand trial based on an incoherent mishmash of conflicting claims by the persons demanding trial - about what the crime is and what the evidence is - makes me "partisan"?

Silly me. I should have realized that the only way to prove that I'm not partisan is to demand trial, FBI and AG be damned!

:doh

Gaugingcatenate said:

And if we all had the exact same citing of the facts, you would pawn that off as us all being in alliance and having R talking points. Cannot have it both ways, yano.

Click to expand...

Now you're attacking me because you invented a hypothetical for the purposes of supporting a specific attack?

Mr Person said:

I said "Bush". You claimed I said "Obama".

I hoped it was an accident that derived from your desire to attack Hillary, buuuuuut perhaps it was just dishonesty. Let's read more.


Waiting for the FBI and AG is "partisan"?

Not being convinced to demand trial based on an incoherent mishmash of conflicting claims by the persons demanding trial - about what the crime is and what the evidence is - makes me "partisan"?

Silly me. I should have realized that the only way to prove that I'm not partisan is to demand trial, FBI and AG be damned!

:doh


Now you're attacking me because you invented a hypothetical for the purposes of supporting a specific attack?

Click to expand...

You were all over the place on that, maybe if you would take time to compose your thoughts before you commit them to the screen? So what ya say, lets do that, eh...?

Yes, I agree with you, Silly you. The majority of what if questions are actually facts, we know she did these things as they are a requirement of the position. So you have no supportable position and if you really cared, and as you stated yourself, "People who are disgusted with the way national politics has been going for the last seven years should care. " then you should want this resolved and the message sent to our hired servants that they are not allowed to just go around screwing the pooch like Madam Secretary of State has so obviously done. What say Lets...

Awww, such overly feigned indignity, such acting should be up for an Oscar... :bravo: but its not, :shock: so, hey, better boycott, eh"? :waiting: