• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New York moves to stop gay conversion therapy for youths

joG said:
And they all have an opinion who's reasoning you accept, but do not know?
Click to expand...

Your sentence makes no sense, just like disagreeing with the medical community makes no sense.
 
LaylaWindu said:
Your sentence makes no sense, just like disagreeing with the medical community makes no sense.
Click to expand...

I was asking you, what the rational behind the medical community's opinion was. You didn't seem to know.
 
joG said:
I was asking you, what the rational behind the medical community's opinion was. You didn't seem to know.
Click to expand...

Wrong again but I have no interest in explaining it to you, you already showed you are biased. They simply found there's no evidence it actually works and that forced CT among minors seems to do more damage. If you want to educate yourself on the topic you already have all the orgs names, look it up. If you still disagree with their findings that's on you and it's your choice to go against the vast majority of the medical field. :D
I'll be sticking with them and the facts.
 
LaylaWindu said:
Wrong again but I have no interest in explaining it to you, you already showed you are biased. They simply found there's no evidence it actually works and that forced CT among minors seems to do more damage. If you want to educate yourself on the topic you already have all the orgs names, look it up. If you still disagree with their findings that's on you and it's your choice to go against the vast majority of the medical field. :D
I'll be sticking with them and the facts.
Click to expand...

What you take for bias might be one of zhe eight years economics at the university, two years quantitative research or a good number of years in capital markets.
 
joG said:
What you take for bias might be one of zhe eight years economics at the university, two years quantitative research or a good number of years in capital markets.
Click to expand...

:lamo If you say so. You are free to believe whatever you choose. I'll be sticking with the vast majority of the medical community and the facts.
 
I have learned that gays are very intolerant of any views or opinions other than there own no matter the circumstance.. They will deny anything or anyone that may think even remotely differently with no regard for others whatsoever..

Maybe not ALL gays but atleast the ones I have had the pleasure of debating with here.. Check my sig..
 
LaylaWindu said:
:lamo If you say so. You are free to believe whatever you choose. I'll be sticking with the vast majority of the medical community and the facts.
Click to expand...

Sorry. That was an answer i connected to the wrong entry. It was part of a discussion on economic bubbles.

For this thread the entry was only to repeat the question about the reasoning behind the "medical community's" opinion that you seem not ti know, but use as an argument. That is rather thin, you know.
 
joG said:
Sorry. That was an answer i connected to the wrong entry. It was part of a discussion on economic bubbles.

For this thread the entry was only to repeat the question about the reasoning behind the "medical community's" opinion that you seem not ti know, but use as an argument. That is rather thin, you know.
Click to expand...

Just like this time, that lie and assumption failed the first time you posted it. You are free to believe whatever you choose. I'll be sticking with the vast majority of the medical community and the facts.
 
LaylaWindu said:
Just like this time, that lie and assumption failed the first time you posted it. You are free to believe whatever you choose. I'll be sticking with the vast majority of the medical community and the facts.
Click to expand...

Without knowing what the argument is? That is rather sad and equivalent to intellectual bankruptcy.
 
joG said:
Without knowing what the argument is? That is rather sad and equivalent to intellectual bankruptcy.
Click to expand...

They are completely blind to anything other than there own ideology of there self identity.
 
Orly? said:
They are completely blind to anything other than there own ideology of there self identity.
Click to expand...

That is often the case, anyway.
 
joG said:
Without knowing what the argument is? That is rather sad and
Click to expand...

Posting that lie a third time also will not make it true. But yes I agree you posting a lie and strawman is equivalent to intellectual bankruptcy.
 
Orly? said:
They are completely blind to anything other than there own ideology of there self identity.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you can find a anti-heterosuxal website some where on the internet. I'd be interested in it just to see how wacky they are just like the anti-gay marriage people can be.
 
Orly? said:
They are completely blind to anything other than there own ideology of there self identity.
Click to expand...

LOL, a libertarian? That's a good one. You are just one of the jaded, pissed off conservatives that's too embarrassed to be associated with the GOP.
So tell me, at what point in Obama's presidency did to change over to "libertarian?"
 
Orly? said:
I have learned that gays are very intolerant of any views or opinions other than there own no matter the circumstance.. They will deny anything or anyone that may think even remotely differently with no regard for others whatsoever..

Maybe not ALL gays but atleast the ones I have had the pleasure of debating with here.. Check my sig..
Click to expand...

You do realize that you haven't been debating gays at all the last few days, but rather straight people, right?
 
joG said:
As I pointed out, I haven't looked at the newer numbers, but would gladly look at the ones you speak of, if you link them.
Click to expand...

So you're using some old "numbers" to claim that gays are more promiscuous.

Ludicrous.
 
ecofarm said:
So you're using some old "numbers" to claim that gays are more promiscuous.

Ludicrous.
Click to expand...

Well, not so old and I did do a quick Google search to see if the numbers I had found were contradicted by newer numbers, which they do not seem to be. As a matter of fact, a short dip in promiscuity seems to have passed with such behavior now again on the rise. But I did not do a thorough study of it this time. So I asked for evidence that would contradict the findings. Why is that "ludicrous"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom