- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 34,817
- Reaction score
- 18,576
- Location
- Look to your right... I'm that guy.
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
...and they're the swing voters.
...and they're the swing voters.
A couple years ago I was taking an online college course and the subject of immigration was the topic of the week for class discussion, especially the requirements to become a US citizen. We were shown example tests that had to be passed. Virtually everybody (who were all young, late teens/early 20s, I was in my late 40s, note the age/world experience difference) felt the test was too hard. Many pointed out that they could not answer most of the questions, one question being who the current Vice-President is.Yeah, I have a 16 YO niece, she's taking that now, but it's mostly history of the American gov't. She doesn't have a clue about the A.G. NOW, or current events. I promise you she doesn't know who is the VP of the USA now. And she'sa smart kid, straight A's. But current events and news, she hasn't a clue.
They don't teach the kids current events or what currently going on in the US, and most kids don't care at all what's going on. There's so many distractions and other things to do nowadays the kids just don't care, and the schools don't teach them, so 10% think Judge Judy is on the USSC.
A couple years ago I was taking an online college course and the subject of immigration was the topic of the week for class discussion, especially the requirements to become a US citizen. We were shown example tests that had to be passed. Virtually everybody (who were all young, late teens/early 20s, I was in my late 40s, note the age/world experience difference) felt the test was too hard. Many pointed out that they could not answer most of the questions, one question being who the current Vice-President is.
Really? Seriously? I said that that question should be standard and that everybody should know the answer. I pointed out that it wasn't unreasonable to expect people to know who the current Vice-President is. It's not like they were asking who John Quincy Adams' VP was, or Grover Cleveland's? No, current, right now.
I was the only student in the class who felt this way, and the only person who agreed with me was the instructor. The instructor didn't say this specifically, but from her words I sensed she was very frustrated and disappointed at the younger student's... not only lack of caring to know the information, but whining that the test was too hard.
I don't understand why even lower schools don't hammer current events. My kids come home learning about Christopher Columbus, the colonies, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln et al, but when it comes to current events they can't get past who the current president is. Learning from history is very important but if you don't know what is currently going on, how the heck can you learn from history?
25% of Americans believe in a literal interpretation of the bible...so yea...we've been screwed for a while.
So not only can ignorance be painful, it can also be expensive.:mrgreen:It looks like you have to pay a lot to be ignorant.
So not only can ignorance be painful, it can also be expensive.:mrgreen:
Sarcasm aside, I still think a University education is a good value, but one has to wonder.And it takes time, effort, and energy to achieve nirvana, evidently.
The bigger question is what schools are producing these morons, and how is it possible.
Because reality has a well known liberal bias and right wing idiots would whine endlessly about "liberal indoctrination" aka acclimating the students to the reality of the current state of American politics.
My kids come home learning about Christopher Columbus, the colonies, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln et al, but when it comes to current events they can't get past who the current president is. Learning from history is very important but if you don't know what is currently going on, how the heck can you learn from history?I don't understand why even lower schools don't hammer current events.
It looks like you have to pay a lot to be ignorant.
I remember when I was in elementary school every week we read My Weekly Reader (I'm 73 - years old).
Learn about it here: Weekly Reader - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You may have a small point, but you don't apply it to all sides. Everyone has their truths and their slants. It would be nice if schools (including colleges) were able to teach current events without having a slanted agenda while doing it. Yes, most of the mainstream media and colleges are left biased so they would have a left slant. Then of course there are media (and even schools) which are right biased. Wouldn't it be nice if everyone could get unbiased news coverage without it slanting one way or the other? You are right, I can't think of even one media or even school of any kind anywhere that doesn't have some kind of slanted bias, one way or the other, whether that bias is large or small. No one anywhere can be trusted 100% to be totally neutral. The trouble with the extremists on both sides is that they think their news is accurate and everyone else's is biased.
Perhaps, the ball dropped when they stopped requiring students to take a civics class in order to graduate from HS.