• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Assad Makes Visit to Church in Damascus Frontline

I wonder if there is anything that Tony Blair or George Bush or Barack Obama could do to absolved themselves from their crimes against humanity?

They require no absolution. But in certain circles the myth is such.
 
They require no absolution. But in certain circles the myth is such.

Of course. I had forgotten that they were the gods themselves, in their own eyes and those of their faithful followers.
 
The worst thing I know about Assad is that he allowed CIA "black sites" for torure in Syria.

Which would beg the question of why the US would be involved in a supposedly nefarious scheme to get rid of him.
 
Which would beg the question of why the US would be involved in a supposedly nefarious scheme to get rid of him.

The left hand does not know what the right hand is doing? :mrgreen:
 
What beneficial outcome has resulted for anyone in the Middle East outside of Israeli borders due to U.S. involvement?

(NOTE: Not turning this into an I/P debate)

I think our involvement with Egypt was for the most part beneficial to Egyptians.
 
I do too (lol) but not nearly the issues I have with certain dictatorships' results. I find it hard to believe a guy with 70% approval ratings is presiding over a civil war.

Well it's not really a civil war. The vast majority of ISIS fighters are foreignors. It's more like an invasion and the U.S. is on the side of ISIS.
 
Back
Top Bottom