• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hundreds of “Refugees” Caught W/ Images of ISIS Flags, Severed Heads on phones [W:63]

Re: Hundreds of “Refugees” Caught With Images of ISIS Flags, Severed Heads on Their P

zimmer said:
Well... you did.
Click to expand...

Well, no, I did not. At all. See, you can tell I did not take that position because I never stated it.

This is why lawyers do not want lame brain clients to take the stand... or even bright ones... but this isn't a court... so you're encouraged to post often... to take all the rope and find that tree... which you do expertly.

I love it when you post... because:

1) You're usually never on topic... responding to the OP.

2) When you try to rebut... it's like an IED going off in your own home... Whoops!!!



See the bolded?

That trip wire between your ears just tripped you up.

Try, try again.
Click to expand...

Throwing around insults isn't going to make your position any more logical, nor citing infowars any more credible.
 
Re: Hundreds of “Refugees” Caught With Images of ISIS Flags, Severed Heads on Their P

Redress said:
Well, no, I did not. At all. See, you can tell I did not take that position because I never stated it.



Throwing around insults isn't going to make your position any more logical, nor citing infowars any more credible.
Click to expand...
Once again... the original source was Norwegian, translated into English so open minded people could read it.

You have illustrated you're not:

1) Open minded.

2) Incapable of accepting the fact the original source is Norwegian.

3) Debating the substance of the article... (see 1)

Young men with ISIS propaganda on their phones? That's not something that should be discussed because the source isn't one of your liking? How about... is the story credible? Or are the Norwegians lying?

Then... and in addition...

... why isn't our press reporting what is happening in Sweden and Norway. The massive increase in rapes due to Muslim men?

Why doesn't our press touch this?

Why don't they inform the public of the threat to women?

Is it because it would reveal the idiocy of what is happening? That it would tank the likes of Hillary and bolster Trump's statements further... because the Demokrat position is one that increases this risk dramatically? (You did read that Sweden is second only to South Africa in rape cases?)

How about addressing the OP and not the source? The issue is credible... yet you choose to ignore it and go on and on and on about the english translator of the Norwegian story?

Wouldn't you call that being narrow minded? Closed minded? Intellectually bankrupt?

These are not small issues... it's:

1) Terrorism and the risks we are bringing into our country... which we do not have to introduce here...

2) War on Women... a real war... unless you don't think rape and gang rape is nothing serious.
 
Last edited:
Re: Hundreds of “Refugees” Caught With Images of ISIS Flags, Severed Heads on Their P

zimmer said:
Once again... the original source was Norwegian, translated into English so open minded people could read it.

You have illustrated you're not:

1) Open minded.

2) Incapable of accepting the fact the original source is Norwegian.

3) Debating the substance of the article... (see 1)

Young men with ISIS propaganda on their phones? That's not something that should be discussed because the source isn't one of your liking? How about... is the story credible? Or are the Norwegians lying?

Then... and in addition...

... why isn't our press reporting what is happening in Sweden and Norway. The massive increase in rapes due to Muslim men?

Why doesn't our press touch this?

Why don't they inform the public of the threat to women?

Is it because it would reveal the idiocy of what is happening? That it would tank the likes of Hillary and bolster Trump's statements further... because the Demokrat position is one that increases this risk dramatically? (You did read that Sweden is second only to South Africa in rape cases?)

How about addressing the OP and not the source? The issue is credible... yet you choose to ignore it and go on and on and on about the english translator of the Norwegian story?

Wouldn't you call that being narrow minded? Closed minded? Intellectually bankrupt?

These are not small issues... it's:

1) Terrorism and the risks we are bringing into our country... which we do not have to introduce here...

2) War on Women... a real war... unless you don't think rape and gang rape is nothing serious.
Click to expand...

You seem to have missed the part where infowars(your primary source) has been shown, in this very thread(see post 71 for example), to be misrepresenting what the Norwegian site actually stated. When you use infowars, you are asking to be deceived. You where deceived. You continue to press that deception, and throw a bunch of insults out there thinking that will hide the deception.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom