Hillary Clinton vs. FOIA

If Hillary Clinton loses this election, it won’t be because of Bernie Sanders. It won’t be because of Marco Rubio or Jeb Bush or Carly Fiorina. It will be because of a 1966 statute.

. . . Huma Abedin, a longtime confidante of Mrs. Clinton’s was somehow allow to work, simultaneously, at the State Department, the Clinton Foundation and as a consultant to Teneo - a consulting firm run by Clinton loyalist Doug Band . . .

All three of Ms. Abedin's hats come into play in an undisclosed email exchange regarding a 2012 dinner in Ireland. As the Washington Examiner reported in May, Mrs. Clinton received an award at the dinner from a Clinton foundation donor. The ceremony was promoted by Teneo. Mrs. Clinton attended in her official capacity as secretary of State. Sort through that.

We already know that the Clinton foundation continued to take foreign money even while Mrs. Clinton was secretary of State. We now know this was only the start of the intertwining. These email summaries show that the Clinton Foundation was the State Department and the State Department was the Clinton Foundation. All one big seamless Clinton-promoting entity . . .

. . . What Democrats are only beginning to understand is that 35 FOIA lawsuits is a guarantee of weekly Clinton email-news bombs. This isn't ending. The polls keep measuring Mrs. Clinton in theoretical matchups. The only matchup that matters is this one: Clinton vs. FOIA.
And FOIA is crushing it.

Click to expand...

Article 1 Section 9:No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state

Click to expand...

American said:

A textbook ethics rules violation.

Click to expand...

tres borrachos said:

"Ethics" and "Clinton" never go into the same sentence for a reason.

Click to expand...