• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dick Cheney Would Torture Again

Grant said:
This is leftists at their best. Note all the violent talk by those who claim to be protesting against violence. It's clear they are against anyone getting hurt but only if they are not Americans. Harming Americans seems to be okay.
Click to expand...

You don't know what the **** you're talking about.
 
Atiya said:
There is no danger of Dick Cheney ever being VP again in this life time. He was never voted for himself by the American people, but usually appointed to positions....the first GWB administration was stolen via partisan US Supreme Court. Clearly, everyone could see GWB was totally UNqualified to be president....hell, he could barely speak English. He was previously a heavy cocaine user...so much so he damaged his nasal septum; he also was a heavy drinker of hard liquor.

Dick Cheney hijacked the naive GWB admin, and poor Bush jr. never knew what was happening until the sixth year of his presidency. Dick Cheney will never ever admit he made a huge error invading Iraq and the one who authorized the torture program for to admit to such would have him face he's a sinister, thirsty coldblooded monster. Cheney proved he did not have a heart by spearheading the torture regime for those captured.
Click to expand...
This bit of nonsense actually got 'likes'. What's happened to the American education system? How can the country have a future when ignorance is not only accepted, but being celebrated? Ignorance make make for amusing TV but, over the long term, it is a very serious problem.
 
VanceMack said:
If it were necessary, Barrack Obama would do the same things Bush authorized...and all those soft little fluffy bunnies today that are outraged and personally damaged over this would be justifying it.
Click to expand...
Barrack Obama has the drone program so we can assume he finds it necessary.
 
American said:
That's a liberal thing.
Click to expand...

Me thinks the liberal thing would be wanting to piss on his grave after his pacemaker batteries fail. Your hard earned tax dollars at work keeping that walking stiff alive.
 
How many human beings from infant to old have been killed by the Obama administration military to date?
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
Obama is only following the precedent established by his predecessor.
Click to expand...

and that makes it correct/right?

If people don't like what Bush/Cheney authorized then how do they support what Obama is doing?
 
mike2810 said:
and that makes it correct/right?

If people don't like what Bush/Cheney authorized then how do they support what Obama is doing?
Click to expand...

One cannot blame Obama without acknowledging the fact that bush set the precedent.

Only those who have been consistent in their criticism of the bush administration and the Obama administration can claim to be free of partisan antics.
 
AJiveMan said:
Me thinks the liberal thing would be wanting to piss on his grave after his pacemaker batteries fail. Your hard earned tax dollars at work keeping that walking stiff alive.
Click to expand...
You've just made Jonathan Gruber very proud.
 
rocket88 said:
You don't think SNL would like that? It would be gold for them, even better than Uncle Joe.
Click to expand...
SNL recognizes that Sarah Palin is old news and not as cutting edge as they would like. They have milked the Sarah Palin jokes to the point where the leftists don't understand what's truth anymore and what is reality. Not that this isn't true in most political situations, but SNL producers are probably far more astute than their viewers.
 
VanceMack said:
And the silence is deafening.
Click to expand...
Because they don't know how to respond. A Left wing commentator may come up with an explanation for them someday and they'll adopt that idea but so far, yes, they've all been silent.
 
VanceMack said:
And the silence is deafening.
Click to expand...

Who is defending the drone strikes?

Grant said:
Because they don't know how to respond. A Left wing commentator may come up with an explanation for them someday and they'll adopt that idea but so far, yes, they've all been silent.
Click to expand...

The silence is probably because you're talking to people who don't exist... why would I answer you about a program I don't support?
 
Grant said:
SNL recognizes that Sarah Palin is old news and not as cutting edge as they would like. They have milked the Sarah Palin jokes to the point where the leftists don't understand what's truth anymore and what is reality. Not that this isn't true in most political situations, but SNL producers are probably far more astute than their viewers.
Click to expand...

If she made a comeback she wouldn't be old news anymore. Unfortunately your hatred for the left is so strong that you thought mentioning her as comedy gold was bringing up her name for political points. You just saw the word "Palin" and you went into reflexive mode. Try context. It's your friend.
 
whysoserious said:
Who is defending the drone strikes?



The silence is probably because you're talking to people who don't exist... why would I answer you about a program I don't support?
Click to expand...

I actually don't have a problem with drone strikes. If we can kill some terrorists without putting American lives at risk, I'm good with that.
 
rocket88 said:
If she made a comeback she wouldn't be old news anymore.
Click to expand...
Yes, but that hasn't happened. When it does I'm sure SNL will be right on it for you.

Unfortunately your hatred for the left is so strong that you thought mentioning her as comedy gold was bringing up her name for political points.
Click to expand...
No hatred for leftists, though it's shares the same area code as 'contempt'.
You just saw the word "Palin" and you went into reflexive mode. Try context. It's your friend.
Click to expand...
Yes, it was reflexive in a way. I wondered why leftists are still trying to make political hay about Sarah Palin. It's as old and tired as all leftist ideas, and the absolute absence of self awareness is what makes this vaudeville-like routine so pathetic.
 
whysoserious said:
Who is defending the drone strikes?



The silence is probably because you're talking to people who don't exist... why would I answer you about a program I don't support?
Click to expand...
The silence is deafening.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
One cannot blame Obama without acknowledging the fact that bush set the precedent.

Only those who have been consistent in their criticism of the bush administration and the Obama administration can claim to be free of partisan antics.
Click to expand...
Sure you can. In fact, you could actually blame him double because he campaigned on changing course and taking us in a different direction. So in the end the guy did everything that he condemned Bush for and was a liar, too.
 
Jack Fabulous said:
Sure you can. In fact, you could actually blame him double because he campaigned on changing course and taking us in a different direction. So in the end the guy did everything that he condemned Bush for and was a liar, too.
Click to expand...

Maybe if bush had been a better leader the country would not have felt they needed to elect Obama over Hilliary.
 
Dick Cheney did what almost everybody in America wanted the Gov't to do after 9/11/ .( And what most STILL want the Gov't to do). So stop with the liberal faux outrage, already.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom