• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Police are being militarized because of constitutionalists

Alex Jones is a conspiracy theorist.

Well, I don't normally read stuff from InfoWars and you may be justified in considering Alex Jones to be nothing more than a conspiracy theorist, but that article did have links from other sources. Heck, you, as a liberal, might even be inclined to pay attention to the Mother Jones link, eh?

In any case, the statement in the video was pretty clear. That policeman's only justification for the acquisition of that equipment was a possible gunfight with constitutionalists. Perhaps the conspiracy is on the part of the police in that community.
 
Well, I don't normally read stuff from InfoWars and you may be justified in considering Alex Jones to be nothing more than a conspiracy theorist, but that article did have links from other sources. Heck, you, as a liberal, might even be inclined to pay attention to the Mother Jones link, eh?

In any case, the statement in the video was pretty clear. That policeman's only justification for the acquisition of that equipment was a possible gunfight with constitutionalists. Perhaps the conspiracy is on the part of the police in that community.

Hardly proof of a thesis. Its not constitutionalists that are rioting. I have yet to see a Tea Party protest require police response.
 
Hardly proof of a thesis. Its not constitutionalists that are rioting. I have yet to see a Tea Party protest require police response.

The point the article was making is that this police officer saying constitutionalists is the cause of police militarization is a result of the training he has undergone. Plain and simple the police officer says the reason they acquired the tank is because of constitutionalists and gun hoarders. It makes you think about the actual training these police officers are undergoing, in retrospect the officer should've said the reason we have this tank is to protect constitutionalists
 
Not sure the point you are trying to make here.

That Constitutionalists (among others) are looked upon with disregard by the government.
 
Alex Jones is a conspiracy theorist.

Alternative news ...the other side of the story, if you will.

Today's hardcore CTs think Alex sold out to the man. [probably to save he and his family's life]
 
Last edited:
Basically, the police are trained to use a lot of that equipment on protesters. IMO, people who want to protest the government are seen as a threat.
 
Basically, the police are trained to use a lot of that equipment on protesters. IMO, people who want to protest the government are seen as a threat.

Well, one thing you can say about Obama's Justice Department is that they discriminate against right-wing protesters more than left-wing protesters...probably because they see the right-wing protesters as more of a threat to their agenda than the useful idiots on the left.
 
Well, one thing you can say about Obama's Justice Department is that they discriminate against right-wing protesters more than left-wing protesters...probably because they see the right-wing protesters as more of a threat to their agenda than the useful idiots on the left.

Um, that is completely false.
 
Um, that is completely false.

Oh...well, I guess you didn't read that link that Jango provided, then.

Ignorance makes people say stupid stuff...but I guess you already know that, eh?
 
Oh...well, I guess you didn't read that link that Jango provided, then.

Ignorance makes people say stupid stuff...but I guess you already know that, eh?

It was focusing on Constitutionalist which is wrong.
 
I was simply responding to OP. That is the premise of his thread.

Oh...so, when you were responding to my post, when you said "Um, that is completely false.", you weren't really responding to me...but to the OP? Why did you quote me, then?

Come on...stop tap-dancing. Say what you mean without ignorance and defend what you say. If you can't do that, then don't waste my time by saying anything. Okay?
 
Oh...so, when you were responding to my post, when you said "Um, that is completely false.", you weren't really responding to me...but to the OP? Why did you quote me, then?

Come on...stop tap-dancing. Say what you mean without ignorance and defend what you say. If you can't do that, then don't waste my time by saying anything. Okay?

Yes, I responded to this post from you
Well, one thing you can say about Obama's Justice Department is that they discriminate against right-wing protesters more than left-wing protesters...probably because they see the right-wing protesters as more of a threat to their agenda than the useful idiots on the left.
which is wrong.
 
Back
Top Bottom