• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Police are being militarized because of constitutionalists

Mycroft said:
Oh...so, when you were responding to my post, when you said "Um, that is completely false.", you weren't really responding to me...but to the OP? Why did you quote me, then?

Come on...stop tap-dancing. Say what you mean without ignorance and defend what you say. If you can't do that, then don't waste my time by saying anything. Okay?
Click to expand...
I was also responding to how wrong OP is about constitutionalist which was highlighted in the attached article.
 
Mycroft said:
So...explain why...since you indicated that you read that link from Jango.
Click to expand...

I read the OP. I thought you were taking about the OP. I did not read any other articles posted since it was not the premise of the thread.
 
rabbitcaebannog said:
I read the OP. I thought you were taking about the OP. I did not read any other articles posted since it was not the premise of the thread.
Click to expand...

You didn't read the link from Jango? Not even after I referred to it?

sigh...

Okay, then. Until you do read that Jango link, anything you say in reference to my post is useless...has no bearing on my post.

Thank you for wasting my time.
 
Mycroft said:
You didn't read the link from Jango? Not even after I referred to it?

sigh...

Okay, then. Until you do read that Jango link, anything you say in reference to my post is useless...has no bearing on my post.

Thank you for wasting my time.
Click to expand...
To suggest that the Justice dept. is discriminating against right wing protestors is wack-a-doodle.
 
rabbitcaebannog said:
Just looked at it. It's not even talking about protestors.
Click to expand...

sigh...

Still not understanding what you are reading.

The motivating force behind the right-wing tax-protest movement...
Click to expand...

This gets back to that ignorance I was talking about...it makes one say stupid stuff.

rabbitcaebannog said:
To suggest that the Justice dept. is discriminating against right wing protestors is wack-a-doodle.
Click to expand...

shrug...

You keep saying stuff like this...but you don't explain why. Are you unable to? If so, just say so. I won't hold it against you...I'll just stop talking to you.

Again...don't waste my time.
 
Mycroft said:
sigh...

Still not understanding what you are reading.



This gets back to that ignorance I was talking about...it makes one say stupid stuff.



shrug...

You keep saying stuff like this...but you don't explain why. Are you unable to? If so, just say so. I won't hold it against you...I'll just stop talking to you.

Again...don't waste my time.
Click to expand...

You're all over the place and not addressing either Jango's post or OP. What a mess.
 
Libertie76 said:
Police officer responds with militarized vehicles are needed for constitutionalists and gun owners

» Police: Armored Military Vehicles Needed for ‘Constitutionalists’ with Firearms Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Please watch the video
Click to expand...

What's a constitutionalist? You are not referring to those wackos who think law enforcement, and other government institutions, should obey the constitution are you?

Yeah the police should get ready. These are the same folks who try to use free speech to create anarchy.
What we all want is to be able to live in a nice policeful community.
 
rjay said:
What's a constitutionalist? You are not referring to those wackos who think law enforcement, and other government institutions, should obey the constitution are you?

Yeah the police should get ready. These are the same folks who try to use free speech to create anarchy.
What we all want is to be able to live in a nice policeful community.
Click to expand...

will your last words be


"I love big brother?":mrgreen:
 
rabbitcaebannog said:
You're all over the place and not addressing either Jango's post or OP. What a mess.
Click to expand...

Everything I've said had been in reference to Jango's link. I even told you that.

In fact, the only time I've referenced the OP was in post #5...my first post in this thread. You know...the one where I slapped you on the ass about your conspiracy thing.

In any case, you still haven't defended your statements to me. Because of that, I'm done with you, darling.

You are dismissed.
 
Mycroft said:
Everything I've said had been in reference to Jango's link. I even told you that.

In fact, the only time I've referenced the OP was in post #5...my first post in this thread. You know...the one where I slapped you on the ass about your conspiracy thing.

In any case, you still haven't defended your statements to me. Because of that, I'm done with you, darling.

You are dismissed.
Click to expand...

Alex Jones IS a conspiracy theorist. You didn't slap me on the ass:lol:
 
Also, you're mixing the anti tax movement with the fringe groups looking to do things like blow up government buildings etc.... The Tea Party is hardly dangerous or seen as such by the government.
 
rabbitcaebannog said:
Also, you're mixing the anti tax movement with the fringe groups looking to do things like blow up government buildings etc.... The Tea Party is hardly dangerous or seen as such by the government.
Click to expand...

Seriously did you watch the video? The camera person asks the police officer " why do you need this equipment" and the officer says " constitutionalists" there is absolutely no conspiracy about it. It's a fact that's what happened that's what the video shows. No matter what you think about Alex jones is completely irrelevant and it is used by people to discredit the actual information coming out.

It's like me having a video of your wife having sex with our neighbor and me showing you the video and because I believe the jfk assassination was a governmental conspiracy you look at the video see it happen then tell me " shut up conspiracy theorist"
 
Last edited:
Libertie76 said:
Seriously did you watch the video? The camera person asks the police officer " why do you need this equipment" and the officer says " constitutionalists"
Click to expand...

They are bringing an arsenal to protest. They are not just planning on using it for some fringe attack.
 
rabbitcaebannog said:
They are bringing an arsenal to protest. They are not just planning on using it for some fringe attack.
Click to expand...

He explains in the video how it's effective in stopping bullets and weapons etc. etc. then she says why do you need this and then he says because constitutionalists and people that have been stockpiling weapons... The only plausible understanding of what he is saying is they are obviously preparing for something to occur in regards to weapons on weapons assaults. Civil war or major protests or a bigger protection of terrorism who the heck knows right? Well he certainly seems to jump to conclusion that constitutionalists are the first target in their training as to why he needs the weapons, he didn't even say terrorists he said constitutionalist, and this attitude was trained there is seriously no question this is fact
 
rabbitcaebannog said:
Also, you're mixing the anti tax movement with the fringe groups looking to do things like blow up government buildings etc.... The Tea Party is hardly dangerous or seen as such by the government.
Click to expand...

I didn't say anything about the Tea Party...but it was Obama's Justice Department who mentioned tax protesters along with other groups of conservatives who they recommend that Law Enforcement be aware of.

Damn...are you lying about reading Jango's link? You sure don't seem to know what that link had to say.

You just keep on shining a bright light on your ignorance, darling.

(but you're giving a great show while you are dancing your ass off)
 
Last edited:
Libertie76 said:
He explains in the video how it's effective in stopping bullets and weapons etc. etc. then she says why do you need this and then he says because constitutionalists and people that have been stockpiling weapons... The only plausible understanding of what he is saying is they are obviously preparing for something to occur in regards to weapons on weapons assaults. Civil war or major protests or a bigger protection of terrorism who the heck knows right? Well he certainly seems to jump to conclusion that constitutionalists are the first target in their training as to why he needs the weapons, he didn't even say terrorists he said constitutionalist, and this attitude was trained there is seriously no question this is fact
Click to expand...

IMO, I think other groups are more threatening than the fringe constitutionalist groups right now. I deduct this from their reactions to current protest. They don't want too many people to speak out of line.
 
Mycroft said:
I didn't say anything about the Tea Party...but it was Obama's Justice Department who mentioned tax protesters along with other groups of conservatives who they recommend that Law Enforcement be aware of.

Damn...are you lying about reading Jango's link? You sure don't seem to know what that link had to say.

You just keep on shining a bright light on your ignorance, darling.

(but you're giving a great show while you are dancing your ass off)
Click to expand...


Your post have nothing at all to do with the thread.
 
rabbitcaebannog said:
IMO, I think other groups are more threatening than the fringe constitutionalist groups right now. I deduct this from their reactions to current protest. They don't want too many people to speak out of line.
Click to expand...

I agree with you, however your opinion on who's a threat isn't relevant since this is a police officers opinion, an opinion he's obviously been trained to have because there's no rational reason why else he would come to that conclusion
 
Last edited:
rabbitcaebannog said:
Basically, the police are trained to use a lot of that equipment on protesters. IMO, people who want to protest the government are seen as a threat.
Click to expand...

Any government that sees peaceful protesters (constitutionalists are peaceful, what they are showing is that they won't be AFRAID TO USE force IF NECESSARY) as a threat is a terrible and ****ed up government.
 
Luftwaffe said:
Any government that sees peaceful protesters (constitutionalists are peaceful, what they are showing is that they won't be AFRAID TO USE force IF NECESSARY) as a threat is a terrible and ****ed up government.
Click to expand...

My point is they are using it on peaceful protestors. That is exactly where we've seen it used.
 
What is notable is what the Deputy said.

First, that the department must have an armored personnel carry because people have guns in their County. Oh really? Is that some new OMG?

But what matters was how he referred to "constitutionalists" who have firearms. Who are they to that deputy? In his exact word "the enemy." The armored personnel carrier is to battle the "enemy." Who is the enemy?"

Americans who believe in the 2nd amendment, that is who is the enemy.
 
jonny5 said:
Hardly proof of a thesis. Its not constitutionalists that are rioting. I have yet to see a Tea Party protest require police response.
Click to expand...

It's not rioting they are worried about.. they can smash that pretty quickly. What they are worried about is armed population that's armed.
 
Libertie76 said:
The point the article was making is that this police officer saying constitutionalists is the cause of police militarization is a result of the training he has undergone. Plain and simple the police officer says the reason they acquired the tank is because of constitutionalists and gun hoarders. It makes you think about the actual training these police officers are undergoing, in retrospect the officer should've said the reason we have this tank is to protect constitutionalists
Click to expand...

Youre OP was not clear. Perhaps if you followed the rules next time.

II - All Opening Post threads posted in *BN* must have:

• Static link to an article from a bona-fide news organization.
• Dateline within the past 48 hours.
• Exact same title as the cited article.
• Quoted short excerpts from the article.
• Your own unique content to spur discussion.
Click to expand...
 
austrianecon said:
It's not rioting they are worried about.. they can smash that pretty quickly. What they are worried about is armed population that's armed.
Click to expand...

They only need to be worried about that if they oppress people. Instead they should focus on the people actually causing all the violence. Race baiters, environmental terrorists, islamic fascists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom