- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 67,218
- Reaction score
- 28,530
- Location
- Lower Hudson Valley, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I seem to have missed it.
I'll add that to the list
I seem to have missed it.
LOL. As I said two post back, this is what I get for bothering to indulge a sangha claim or comment. Should have figured my first encounter would be symbolic of all the future ones. A waste of time for everyone but the trolleriffic. My bad.
This does look awfully familiar. Almost as if there is a very small tool set that is in use here. Hmmm, where have I seen this before? Could it be in the only other thread I have spoken to you in? Wow, that is it! I mean this is really almost...........cut and paste time now, huh sangha? What next, you will go on for some time about how "right" you are and have been all along and tear spoiled coffee? Again?
http://www.debatepolitics.com/philosophical-discussions/193049-joel-olsteen-just-money-20.html#post1064125513
You do have one point sangha. In addition to erratic and irrational, your post truly are hysterical!
View attachment 67178080
except to you. Cleopatra, the Queen of Denial much?
Like I asked, Cleopatra Queen of Denial much? Your enthusiastic answer is yes! Which was obvious on the first page. :roll:
You have no argument anymore, yet you still argue. You just never see that on internet debate forums. What next, you are rubber and I am glue? Or something a bit more nuanced? :lamo
The only thing I can see that you have given is a dead on arrival thread that was debunked early on. And a lot of juvenile comments and postures, which again, you just never see on internet debate forums. Since you have nothing intelligent to articulate but will doubtless continue to try to strain at doing so anyway? Well there is a wall covered in wet paint and somebody has to watch it dry.
This is what I get for bothering to indulge a sangha claim or comment. Should have figured my first encounter would be symbolic of all the future ones. A waste of time for everyone but the trolleriffic. My bad.:doh
You did not see me in The Bird Cage? I was divine!What's the drama-queening part? I seem to have missed it.
So what, lefties did it to Bush too.
As you might have figured out, I give as good as I get. When all you offer me is idiocy, I reply in kind. :2razz:
Wrong again. I didn't make the claim. The sources I linked to did. Don't agree with them? Go ahead and prove them wrong.
Let me get this straight. Someone posts a link that appears to be reporting on an event. Someone else says the whole thing is BS, but refuses to say why, much less supply any debunking evidence. And therefore the OP is supposed to "prove" what happened in the link?!?
Yeah, right.
Bull****. We said, clearly and repeatedly, "Bush deserves a fair trial." See, that's one of the many differences between the Right and the Left: The Left wants justice; the Right wants vengeance.
Nothing new with these folks.
lol
You really believe this?
what would you like to see Bush brought up on trial for?Bull****. We said, clearly and repeatedly, "Bush deserves a fair trial." See, that's one of the many differences between the Right and the Left: The Left wants justice; the Right wants vengeance.
You don't believe in facts. You accept them or deny them.
Old white people with flags is a sure sign of Tea Party and a dozen such folks make the case that the other 30 million or so are just the same. You can use that logic in this case but if you dare to ascribe the behavior of looting, rioting, arson crowds in the midwest to any other group that's racist and maybe criminal.
what would you like to see Bush brought up on trial for?
Ah...lying...THATS what you would see him charged with.The deaths of over 100,000 Iraqi civilians, systematic torture of POWs, and lying to Congress to get us into the war seem like good places to start.
Democrat protesters call for assassination of the police.
Ah...lying...THATS what you would see him charged with.
Over, say...lies like this?
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
I guess your 'lie' allegation went right out the window faster than you could utter it.I guess over a hundred thousand slaughtered Iraqi civilians mean as much to you as they mean to Dick Cheney. Your empathy is noted.