You just won't read it, and you probably wouldn't understand it anyway.
The data says you are wrong...where is the published peer reviewed proof of creationism? There isn't any...
We have the fossils...we win.
Ich habe schon Pferde vor der Apotheke kotzen sehen.
even evolutionist say they don't exist so I don't see how you can keep up with the façade is beyond me.
there are 0 fossil that depict a macro-evolutionary change from one species to another. to deny this is to live in scientific loony land.
Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism.
IE blue fruit flys to red fruit flys are still fruit flys.
they ran generations of fruit flys they didn't evolve into anything else they stayed fruit flys.
if you want to continue that faulty logic then apes should still be evolving into humans ol wait they aren't.
which is exactly what darwins theory proposed. that humans evolved from apes.
when they couldn't prove it (0 fossils that proved the transition from apes to humans) and the ones they did try to pass off were found out to be fakes.
they dropped it and went with the whole common ancestor thing. the issue with that is they still haven't found the common ancestor.
all the skulls and stuff they have found are human plain and simple.
if you believe in evolution then you believe that tornado can go through a junkyard and assemble a fully function jet.
pretty simple when you get down to it.
but people that believe in evolution are so dogmatic about it that they refuse to see how absurd the theory actually is.