One item at a time.
1. You have not shown any such thing. All you did is make a claim.
That is one issue. Support it.
2. The other issue is that you have not supported your claim that the article is based on a lie.
The businesses listed were of just some of businesses damaged. Not all.
Most of the damaged businesses were on West Florissant Avenue and included:
It is like you do not understand the words "and included". What do you think those words mean?
All you have attempted to do is show that some are not minority owned. Which in no way addresses the whole.
And the headline certainly makes it clear that some are not minority owned if the majority are.
Bottom line, you still have failed to support your allegation that the report is based on a lie.
Btw, I do not have to provide the names of any businesses. It is irrelevant to your false assertion.