You could if you took the time to educate yourself on this issue.
But there should be way for them to reunite and atone for any transgression.
But I presented you with a chance to read an educational essay.Circumstance. Fate. Chance. A mistake. Who can tell?
I don't think you are educated in the other perspective
Let's us know when you find the answer to that one. Now, answer the question.
But I presented you with a chance to read an educational essay.
You speak as if you turned it down .. and instead posted a picture of a family separated by a fence.
That's a complete disconnect.
You purported that this picture is all you need to "understand".
But you don't say what that meaning is, or what the picture caused you to understand.
And now, when the relevant question is posed to you, you have no answer.
In the American justice system, fault is key to a conviction.
And, conviction for the specific crime is key to sentencing.
If you continue to emotionalize, you'll be wasting your time.
I could easily post pictures of Americans homeless on the streets because they lost their jobs to wage-slave illegals.
When all is said and done, what's important is the facts of what happened.
No matter how sad some situations are, some people have simply brought them on themselves.
Yes, there's a difference between our immigration system and illegal aliens.True. 'Obamnesty', as you call it, is not popular with the electorate, and polls very low. What's polling high is congressional legislation to 'fix' immigration. This latest action from Obama has created a situation where it is nearly impossible for Republicans to vote for it, and probably has shelved real immigration reform another 10 years. So much so for his claimed caring about immigrants. All he cares about is politics, and he has a very cynical and narcissistic approach to it.
OK. So it's not economic asylum. What is it then?
What is the great draw of the US that pulls so many of them across dangerous lands, possibly losing their lives, paying off the coyotes a huge pile of money (relative to them) to come to the US illegally, possibly face deportation if caught, and later, possible separation from their kids.
If we can identify that, and turn it down, perhaps they'd be less inclined to go through all that to get here illegally? Perhaps they'd go through the legal immigration process?
What is a lie? The belief that some illegals can be given amnesty?
Just because they brought it upon themselves that does not mean they deserve to be consumed by circumstances.
There's the problem with spinning around as you have been, you're lost your own point. I explained how the taking care of their families financially and safety excuses were lies and you told us your morals required you to buy those lies. I asked what possible morals could you have that would require such.
Your phrase "consumed by circumstances" is simply meaningless rhetoric.Just because they brought it upon themselves that does not mean they deserve to be consumed by circumstances.
My moral is to never inflict a harsh punishment to someone who did not act because of malice or evil intentions.
Malice is the behavior of the illegal alien who comes here to knowingly steal a job whose rights to that job does not belong to that illegal alien but belongs to someone else.My moral is to never inflict a harsh punishment to someone who did not act because of malice or evil intentions.
So now you need education on what morals are as well? And how in the world, with your lack of education on this issue have you determined there is no malice or evil intentions or even that the punishment is harsh or even a punishment? It's not btw, deportation isn't a punishment.
Malice is the behavior of the illegal alien who comes here to knowingly steal a job whose rights to that job does not belong to that illegal alien but belongs to someone else.
That's thievery.
You know .. I wonder ..
.. Do you personally know someone who is an illegal alien in America?
Are/were your parent(s) illegal aliens?
Are you somehow personally involved in this?
I'm wondering if you could answer those questions for me.
Would you do that for me, please?
I would use the fact that they are in custody and convicted to prioritize their removal. Why use resources to catch them instead of to deport them?
Apparently, we'd $285 billion to deport all of the people eligible for deportation.But there should be no give in the law in any circumstance. It might be okay to overlook a parking or jay walking ticket, but ALL anti-social crimes--those with the potential of harming others, committed by somebody who is here uninvited to begin with, should make that person subject to deportation immediately upon serving whatever sentence is imposed.
Inorite?Yeah, probably, and we can also tell, who's making it such, and who's going to end up paying for it.
The precedence has been set. I expect some sort of lie from the administration when this question is raised. Of course, that'll be after the wheels and actions have already been put into motion.
Exactly!Why as a tax payer should I be expected to pay the legal fees for an illegal immigrant? Why should I be expected for their legal proceeding's court costs?
Are the tax payers a money tree that's free to be shook down whenever foolish government spending needs funding?
If my child had been sexually abused, I would want to have terrorists moved down the priority list?If you had a daughter who was abused sexually by one, I would guarantee you that you wouldn't have made this comment of yours. just sayin....
Well, despite your misgivings, Obama is the PotUS, so he actually IS the person who should be making these sorts of decisions.So...I'm not sure you or Barry should be making the priorities in these matters.
Meaningless topical irrelevancy.I can not bring myself to bring harm to people.
And what if the "home" of some these illegals is so bad that the entire reason they came here was to save their life?
Yes, that is exactly what I would prefer except for a very few hardship cases where the illegals had no choice in the matter and have no 'home' elsewhere to return to. I would like for there to be a guest worker program in place that would allow those productive people with homes and businesses and jobs here and who are paying taxes to return to. But they need to get their affairs in order and leave and then come back through legal channels. The only 'amnesty' that should be involved is maybe a 180-day grace period that would allow them to do that. Those we want as citizens here would most likely be willing to do that. The rest, we will be far better off without.
So it can't be both? It has to be either-or? Really?If my child had been sexually abused, I would want to have terrorists moved down the priority list?
Well, despite your misgivings, Obama is the PotUS, so he actually IS the person who should be making these sorts of decisions.
just an fyi
Apparently, we'd $285 billion to deport all of the people eligible for deportation.
Since that money is not in the budget, someone somewhere must make a decision about which cases receive priority treatment.
:shrug:
If you don't like it, then cough up billions more so that there's not a need for priorities.
Inorite?
The govt is infallible, so why do we need it to be held accountable for its action through processes like trials using laws and crap like that.
If you're a govt agent, you should be able to do as you damn well please--laws and rules be damned.
We don't need to stinking rule of law.
What are we? Freaking Islamo-commies?
**** due process.
**** courts.
**** the law.
Exactly!
The rule of law ain't worth ****.
It holds no value for us REAL Americans!
We say, "**** laws and constitutions! That **** is for French Islamo-commies"
...or maybe that's all a really, really bad idea.