Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he stops voting for the Free Fish party.
You seem to be confused.
Doesn't matter one bit what examples you have provided.
He has stated that he wants it to remain the way it is now, in context, that is with out it being classifieds a utility.
So again, unless you got something that clearly indicates otherwise we need to stay within the context of what he said.
So get to providing it and we can go from there.
As it stands at this moment, this is about reclassifying it into a Utility, which as he pointed out, is just wrong.
"The law is reason, free from passion."
100 Mbps is 100 Mbps.
The barriers to entry are high
It's not efficient for multiple companies to lay wire to the same neighborhood.
Cable companies are natural monopolies and therefore shouldn't be able to use that power to squeeze both users and content providers.
Ted Cruz is a demagogue bought and paid for by cable companies.
“Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.” John Maynard Keynes
My bad. I was under the impression that there were more than 3 ISP's in the US.
Maybe I'm just not understanding this whole thing. I know I can get my internet access through Cox, Centurylink, Dish, Verizon, Comcast and a bunch of others but maybe those aren't ISP's.