Page 49 of 51 FirstFirst ... 394748495051 LastLast
Results 481 to 490 of 501

Thread: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense' [W:406]

  1. #481
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Ask the NSA
    Last Seen
    07-24-16 @ 01:41 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    5,849
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense' [W:406]

    Quote Originally Posted by Misterveritis View Post
    Not after the sky has fallen. This coup sets the stage for the end of the nation. Pat yourself on the back. You did it. You and your Tyrant-president overturn the Revolutionary War and the Civil War. Congratulations. He does not like to be called the king. He prefers Emperor. Dear Leader, First Citizen or Der Fuhrer all seem appropriate.

    Heil!
    Sorry, I just can't get on board with the idea that Obama is a "tyrant" or a "king" because he is declining to use executive power in a narrow number of cases to enforce immigration laws against people who have never done anything wrong aside from flee bad living conditions to try and make a decent living for their family.

    My guess is that most people don't understand what either word means.

  2. #482
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Last Seen
    03-03-17 @ 10:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    13,813

    Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense' [W:406]

    Quote Originally Posted by TeleKat View Post
    Sorry, I just can't get on board with the idea that Obama is a "tyrant" or a "king" because he is declining to use executive power in a narrow number of cases to enforce immigration laws against people who have never done anything wrong aside from flee bad living conditions to try and make a decent living for their family.

    My guess is that most people don't understand what either word means.
    Of course you cannot. You support authoritarian statists. He is ruling against the will of the American citizen on behalf of the invading illegal aliens. I realize that to those of you who are on the left the Constitution is an obstruction to your desires. It was intended to be. When a president chooses to void the Constitution he is waging war against the citizens, the nation and the Constitution itself. It really does not matter whether you like what he did or not. His actions are unconstitutional and reprehensible. I want the House to impeach him. I want the Senate to convict him and remove him from office. If we ever get a real attorney general, and not just a hatchet carrier for the democratic president, I hope we can arrest the traitor, try him, convict him and then put him on death row until he is a very old man. It will be a warning to the next tyrant.

  3. #483
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Ask the NSA
    Last Seen
    07-24-16 @ 01:41 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    5,849
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense' [W:406]

    Quote Originally Posted by Misterveritis View Post
    Of course you cannot. You support authoritarian statists.
    The irony, it's really killing me.

    He is ruling against the will of the American citizen
    It just so happens that American citizens are generally in favor of this kind of action...

    on behalf of the invading illegal aliens.
    Deportations are still on the rise and this action will double security at the border. Not exactly "on behalf" of these people. All he did was strike a deal with some of these illegals based on narrow criteria (time spent here, children here, no violent criminal background, etc) as a means to pull these illegals out of the shadows and eventually get them paying taxes and contributing.

    I realize that to those of you who are on the left the Constitution is an obstruction to your desires.
    I'm not the one advocating that the President's power of the pardon be taken from him.

    When a president chooses to void the Constitution he is waging war against the citizens, the nation and the Constitution itself.
    Except he isn't voiding the constitution.

    It really does not matter whether you like what he did or not. His actions are unconstitutional and reprehensible.
    No they aren't.

    I want the House to impeach him. I want the Senate to convict him and remove him from office. If we ever get a real attorney general, and not just a hatchet carrier for the democratic president, I hope we can arrest the traitor, try him, convict him and then put him on death row until he is a very old man.
    Yeah good luck with that.

  4. #484
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Last Seen
    03-03-17 @ 10:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    13,813

    Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense' [W:406]

    Quote Originally Posted by TeleKat View Post
    The irony, it's really killing me.



    It just so happens that American citizens are generally in favor of this kind of action...



    Deportations are still on the rise and this action will double security at the border. Not exactly "on behalf" of these people. All he did was strike a deal with some of these illegals based on narrow criteria (time spent here, children here, no violent criminal background, etc) as a means to pull these illegals out of the shadows and eventually get them paying taxes and contributing.



    I'm not the one advocating that the President's power of the pardon be taken from him.



    Except he isn't voiding the constitution.



    No they aren't.



    Yeah good luck with that.
    I will place you in the undecided column.

  5. #485
    Sage

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last Seen
    10-10-16 @ 10:59 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    6,073

    Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense' [W:406]

    Quote Originally Posted by grip View Post
    I never made any allegations, I simply posed a question. If they're smart they won't try to impeach him, but rather pass some legislation that protects the borders.
    Why would the GOP want to pass border protection legislation when they oppose it 100%? Explain.

  6. #486
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    09-27-16 @ 12:59 PM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    5,189

    Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense' [W:406]

    Quote Originally Posted by Misterveritis View Post
    I want the Senate to convict him and remove him from office. If we ever get a real attorney general, and not just a hatchet carrier for the democratic president, I hope we can arrest the traitor, try him, convict him and then put him on death row until he is a very old man. It will be a warning to the next tyrant.
    Dumbass posting of the year!

    BTW, why would you put someone on death row to stay until they are very old? That's what the general population in prison is about. At least try to have your dumbass rants make a little sense.

  7. #487
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:09 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    89,649

    Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense' [W:406]

    Quote Originally Posted by matchlight View Post
    Please explain how a majority vote in the House, on impeachment or anything else, shows contempt for the American people. Who do you imagine elected the Representatives, if not the American people?
    Because when it comes down to the actions the current president did it will be very difficult for the manager of the charges to effectively demonstrate that Obama has done anything radically different than previous US Presidents of both parties who have used and expanded executive power over the last 75 years. And when that becomes very obvious that Obama is just the latest in a line of power expanders who push the envelope in favor of the presidency the real question then becomes NOT did Obama do this - the real question becomes why are Republicans trying to nail his ass to the wall at this point in time when Congress has been ignoring others for a very long time now?

    And I suspect a sizable portion of Americans will indeed view this is political chicanery and be not pleased by it.
    __________________________________________________ _
    There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers

  8. #488
    Light△Bender

    grip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    ☚ ☛
    Last Seen
    12-04-17 @ 04:12 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    17,186
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense' [W:406]

    Quote Originally Posted by solletica View Post
    Why would the GOP want to pass border protection legislation when they oppose it 100%? Explain.
    You don't make any sense.
    Einstein, "science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

  9. #489
    Sage

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last Seen
    10-10-16 @ 10:59 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    6,073

    Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense' [W:406]

    Quote Originally Posted by grip View Post
    You don't make any sense.
    NO, it makes perfect sense--why would the GOP want to enact legislation (i. e. tight border laws) when it's against it? Explain.

    Unless you're one of those right wing stooges gullible enough to believe that the GOP's anti-immigration rhetoric reflects its true motives?

  10. #490
    Sage
    mak2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Last Seen
    07-08-16 @ 01:58 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,050

    Re: Krauthammer: 'Impeachable Offense' [W:406]

    No kidding, neither side wants anything done about it. So the RWers still want to be able to tell the base they wanted a fence and border guards and on and on, then blame the Democrats for not having it. Then still have the cheap undocumented laborers after it is all over.
    Quote Originally Posted by solletica View Post
    NO, it makes perfect sense--why would the GOP want to enact legislation (i. e. tight border laws) when it's against it? Explain.

    Unless you're one of those right wing stooges gullible enough to believe that the GOP's anti-immigration rhetoric reflects its true motives?
    God Bless the Marine Corps.

Page 49 of 51 FirstFirst ... 394748495051 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •