• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Scott

Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

.... conservative whites from the south who don't give a damn about minorities.

stereotyping: It's ok when liberal ignoramuses do it!
LOL!
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

wouldn't surprise me at all. They got theirs and to hell with all the rest of the blacks. They were, after all, elected by conservative whites from the south who don't give a damn about minorities.



So you demonstrate prejudice and stereotyping to fight prejudice and stereotyping? and those black guys are bad because they don't act like you think black guys should act?

Did I sum that up correctly?
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

stereotyping: It's ok when liberal ignoramuses do it!
LOL!

Backed up by about 150 years of history.

Jim Crow - look it up. You evidently aren't aware of it.
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

lol I don't think you could've found a more biased, partisan source than the anti-science Heartland Institute, if you tried. Those are the folks that testified before congress that smoking doesn't cause cancer and now they want you to believe a poll conducted by morons in Oklahoma that want to abolish Common Core in favor of creationism. Yay, let the dumbing down of America begin.

That was the first link....I haven't looked at the second....I don't think my heart can't take it.

:shrug: i grabbed the first off google. Are you claiming that either A) school choice is not supported by African Americans or are you claiming B) that school choice is not opposed by the NAACP?
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

So you demonstrate prejudice and stereotyping to fight prejudice and stereotyping? and those black guys are bad because they don't act like you think black guys should act?

Did I sum that up correctly?

No. You didn't.
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

wouldn't surprise me at all. They got theirs and to hell with all the rest of the blacks. They were, after all, elected by conservative whites from the south who don't give a damn about minorities.

Yeah. I think you are confusing "judging people by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin" with "not giving a damn about minorities".

But it is telling that you do so.
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

Backed up by about 150 years of history.

Jim Crow - look it up. You evidently aren't aware of it.

cue Jethro Tull- Living in the past.

LOL . Hey don't feel bad, most white liberals (and the NAACP) have a vested interest in holding onto long outdated stereotypes!!

Oh wait . My bad....Voter ID laws....POLL TAX ....JIM CROW!!! what next? ....legalizing lynching? HAHAHAHAHA
 
Last edited:
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

Maybe you can give me some examples of "systemic privilege".

I can (and many were mentioned in the link I provided), but I will not. Debating someone on a subject in which they are clueless is nonsense. Good day.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

Indeed I do, yet you seem to limit diversity to matters (factors?) of race/ethnicity (perhaps even economic status) but not based on any other factors. I maintain that diversity of political opinion, economic background, rural/city environment matters as well - how diverse is any group that votes mainly (90%+?) for one political party?

Obviously, a random lottery would be best at assuring diversity, as it can give no weight to any "discriminating" factors. What seems to pass for diversity (to you?) is a desire to define an "optimal mix" and thereby skew the selection (discrimination?) process to achieve that mix.

There is no reason to ignore the macro just because the micro exists. These things are not mutually exclusive. Diversity, in many forms from race to extra-curricular activities, is valued by universities and factor into acceptance.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

I can (and many were mentioned in the link I provided), but I will not. Debating someone on a subject in which they are clueless is nonsense. Good day.


If you can't explain your position, do you actually have one, my friend. ;)
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

If you can't explain your position, do you actually have one, my friend. ;)

Actually, it's all a conspiracy. There is no such thing as systemic privilege. In fact, it is white hetero males that are victimized by society. But as a member of the "**** whitie" club, it's my job to invent social concepts and otherwise obfuscate the plight of the white man.


:lol:
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

So what are "White Values" and what are "black values"? Can one be a black person and not support the NAACP or is that taboo?


White values that Mia Love represent are likely anti-government values as opposed to social justice values.


Obviously a person can be black and not support the NAACP. But OP seems to think that a black organization has to endorse a person just because they're black.

Both Scott and Love made it a point to avoid the NAACP precisely because they're a black organization that represents blacks...whereas they were both elected by whites to represent whites. In 2012, Mia Love even went further and threatened to gut the congressional black caucus from within if she were elected. Mia Love has gone out of her way to distance herself from blacks....and now whites are wondering why the NAACP doesn't support Mia Love. Really?


Utah doesn't have a large black population which means very few, if any, blacks voted for Mia Love. There just isn't a need for the NAACP in Utah and obviously Mia Love doesn't need the NAACP to succeed. But had she stayed in Brooklyn she might be telling a different story.
 
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

What does that have to do with the election or Tim Scott and Mia Love?


The NAACP gave Tim Scott's a big, fat F on his voting record, so why would they support him?

Ah, so they fail at being "colored people" then. Nice.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

White values that Mia Love represent are likely anti-government values as opposed to social justice values.

anti-government are soley white values? Social justice are not white values? sounds..... a bit, no offense, but racist if you ask me.

Obviously a person can be black and not support the NAACP. But OP seems to think that a black organization has to endorse a person just because they're black.


incorrect, they are correctly pointing out that the NAACP only represents liberal blacks, others are considered "uncle toms".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhH0QVgZlrk


Both Scott and Love made it a point to avoid the NAACP precisely because they're a black organization that represents blacks...whereas they were both elected by whites to represent whites. In 2012, Mia Love even went further and threatened to gut the congressional black caucus from within if she were elected. Mia Love has gone out of her way to distance herself from blacks....and now whites are wondering why the NAACP doesn't support Mia Love. Really?


Distance herself from a liberal black caucus? makes sense to me. Tell me do you thin scott and love are "uncle toms".....


another thing, if this was turned around and you had some right wingers sayin some **** about some black elected representatives like this, they would no doubt be called racist for it.

double standard?



Utah doesn't have a large black population which means very few, if any, blacks voted for Mia Love. There just isn't a need for the NAACP in Utah and obviously Mia Love doesn't need the NAACP to succeed. But had she stayed in Brooklyn she might be telling a different story.


Why, why if she stayed in brooklyn? I am not sure of your point?
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

It is rather sad to see what a pathetic organization the NAACP is.

Hey RHH.

Nice to see you again back out in the ether....
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

Actually, it's all a conspiracy. There is no such thing as systemic privilege. In fact, it is white hetero males that are victimized by society. But as a member of the "**** whitie" club, it's my job to invent social concepts and otherwise obfuscate the plight of the white man.


:lol:


just because I don't subscribe to the sky is falling undefined "systemic privilege" you kinda put forth, does not mean I believe in the opposite. Though I ended up joining the military after scoring in the 98% percentile for the NYPD test and was told "nope, sorry you are not black or a woman, can't hire you". while I believe they set the test scores sat 65% for them in order to attract more minorities. I sure felt privileged that daY! lol
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

The NAACP is a non-partisan organization that only, just by chance mind you, supports Democrat candidates and Democrat initiatives.

What were the odds....??
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

just because I don't subscribe to the sky is falling undefined "systemic privilege"

No one claimed the sky is falling. In fact, things have been getting better every decade.
 
Last edited:
Re: NAACP Releases Statement On 2014 Elections, But No Mention Of Mia Love Or Tim Sco

There is a vast difference between opposing everything that we stand for and not supporting a desired agenda (checklist of desired legislative changes).



It seems to me that being a demorat is somewhat of a requirement for passing that NAACP "agenda" test. In other words, if you are not for our agenda then you are against us.

I hate to tell you this, but that is true with almost every organization, business and government ever created by mankind, whether its the MMC or the NRA or ISIS or the USA...all have a reason to exist based on shared values. Furthermore, many organizations will show you the door if you don't share their values. Did Club for Growth endorse any democrats? How about AEI, Heritage, or any number of Koch funded groups....did they support any blacks...or whites...that didn't share their values?


Singling out a black organization to demagogue for doing the same thing that conservative organizations do seems a bit disingenuous at best and racist at worst.
 
Last edited:
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

kinda cherry picked my post.

Well, excuse me for pointing out that your premise is BS. It'd be nice if you would admit such instead of whining about how someone demonstrated such. Stop playing victim and admit your nonsense.

Systemic privilege is only undefined for you because of ignorance. You really shouldn't expect people on the internet to explain HS sociology. Ask a HS kid, they can explain it to you. I'm not here to teach things that even children know.

Have fun and, again, good day.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

White


Obviously a person can be black and not support the NAACP. But OP seems to think that a black organization has to endorse a person just because they're black.
ry.

Well it seems logical that if your organization is named for advancing colored people- I would think they would at least acknowledge the advancement of Mia Love and Tim Scott.I mean, it's sure isn't like Mia Love reflects badly on colored people. Smart, good looking, accomplished.
Pretty good role model I'd say.
 
Re: Patthetic NAACP fails to mention historic wins by Tim Scott and Mia Love.

Well, excuse me for pointing out that your premise is BS. It'd be nice if you would admit such instead of whining about how someone demonstrated such. Stop playing victim and admit your nonsense.

Systemic privilege is only undefined for you because of ignorance. You really shouldn't expect people on the internet to explain HS sociology. Ask a HS kid, they can explain it to you. I'm not here to teach things that even children know.

Have fun and, again, good day.



You didn't though, you took a thing, proclaimed it fact, but can't define it.


it's a theory, it's not fact, and sadly, is often used as a crutch or a bat.

In reality Government dependency is what infected the inner city black community, not the legacy of “white privilege."
 
Back
Top Bottom