There's no subject to debate. You posted something which is a waste of time to discuss and those of us who are rightly pointing out how ridiculous the "source" you're basing your thread on is doing the only type of discussing which can be done..... Plus the fact that those progressive liberals in here that are attacking me, and the OP based on that rather than actually discussing the subject have already LOST the debate.
I asked three college people I knew if they believed in abortion until age 5. All three said no.They show themselves as either in agreement with this type of Murder, or they don't want any light shed on the disgusting lines of thought that are promoted by their peers on college campuses these days.
Thus, I have now completely proven your source 100% wrong. I expect an apology and a retraction.
Nothing is misleading about it, especially considering the origins of the name. Of course, you don't know anything about that, but not knowing something obviously doesn't bother you.Then you have the first poster to my OP, Slyfox....A misleading screen name
I'm an adult mature enough to know not to believe something from obviously biased sources.designed to make people think on first glance that he is a mature adult
I was hoping to bring you up to that level.
Yup. I do demand a certain level of intelligence and rationality when I debate. Those who are unable to meet said level of intelligence or rationality do not deserve anything more than what I give them.and often posts in inflamatory style, using common methods of snark, and self conceit to project that people must meet his standard of posting
Nothing is progressive about my "ideology". I've had those on the left accuse me of being a conservative and those on the right accuse me of being liberal.if it is not in agreement with his progressive ideology
Umm...you posted "anecdotes" from an obviously biased source who provided ZERO evidence to support their claim and you expect an in-depth response? To quote you...how dumb is that?Then like a child he resorts to supremely childish retort, baiting, and insult.
In my defense, I had to come up with something which would be understood, since you obviously don't understand how ridiculous your "source" was.Oh so clever, in a 4th grade kind of way....right folks?
How can I be inflammatory, snarky, conceited, ego-driven and passive/aggressive at the same time? It's like you can't even keep your insults straight.In his usual ego driven, passive/aggressive style
I've told the truth. I'm not a progressive or a liberal or a conservative or any other simple term. Unlike you, I can process information without trying to simplify it to a "left" or "right" decision.he wants to give some "friendly advice"? Hmmmm...Friendly advice from a progressive that can't even tell the truth about that on a public forum
No, it's not a fallacy to point out a lack of concrete or scientific evidence from a biased source.Then he moves directly into attacking the source, an ad hom fallacy
How about you spend more time researching what fallacies are before you erroneously insert them into conversations?
What are you talking about? I don't have a mother or father who moderate anything. Furthermore, and to address the point you so horribly were trying to make, I'd roughly guess 80-90% of the posts I report have nothing to do with me. I know I don't suffer stupidity or foolishness well, so I don't blame people for getting upset when they debate me.This is just the usual tactic from people like him, that will at first chance go running off to Mod mommy or daddy after they display the worst of character....So easy, they are.
But it is all the same. You post an article from a source which provides no evidence except "anecdotes" from an obviously biased source, all to further your objective of trying to cast everyone who doesn't believe exactly like you do as evil.But, this thread wasn't supposed to be a steaming pile
Your thread was a steaming pile from the get go and for you to complain now that people have accurately pointed out the absurdity of the basis for your thread is asinine.
Says the person who posted an obviously BS article and exposed their agenda.that is just the kneejerk reaction of liberals and progressives when they can not defend or talk about their agenda's that are exposed.
By the way, didn't you hear? There's a new study out now which says NOBODY believes it is okay to abort a child at the age of five. All three people I asked said it wasn't, so you are obviously posting in response to old information.
Please acknowledge you now believe my study just as you believed the one before. Thanks.
I am saddened and shocked there are people who still believe anything they read on the Internet.I am saddened, and shocked at the people, the real people that would hold such a viewpoint, that it is fine to kill a 5 year old, and even try to call it "abortion".....
Yes and the idea some of them are so willing to believe a bunch of BS saddens me greatly.I mean think about it people....We all have sons, daughters, nieces, nephews
“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.”
― Stephen R. Covey
Speaking of which, did you read about the new study on this topic? 100% of the people polled said they do not believe in abortion after birth, so this obviously proves no one believes in post birth abortion.