He once used conservapedia in a thread to support his positions.
But this one takes the cake.
The idea that "anecdotal evidence" supports the notion that progressives are lining up to kill 5 year olds is so outrageous it disqualifies him from any and all intelligent debate in the future.
I have never heard of this in my entire life. I have been active in pro-choice circles for 10 years, and I was recently in college.
But that's not surprising, given that the "source" is empty anecdote by a bunch of foaming anti-choicers famous for lying about everything.
Statistically, abortion opinions have changed very little in recent decades. Since most people aren't even ok with abortion after 20 weeks, it makes absolutely no sense that they'd be ok with child killing at 5 years old. That is just completely divorced from reality.
As someone that is socially liberal, I remember with our son we were thinking the first 5 years were obviously a trial basis and if it didn't work out we would just take a mulligan and try again.
We adopted our daughters at age 4 and 9, so with the 9 year old we were pretty much stuck with her regardless, but the 4 year old we still had a 1 year trial basis.... You know because that's how us social liberals think. Human life means nothing to us anymore... at least up until age 5.....
"You're the only person that decides how far you'll go and what you're capable of." - Ben Saunders (Explorer and Endurance Athlete)
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he stops voting for the Free Fish party.
My point is that age does not grant wisdom. The only thing age guarantees is another step closer to dying.
I don't know how long many of you have been away from College....
However, I clearly remember times when the over zealous "Constitution Party" at my campus was setting up shop in the student center and harassing every passer by while having pictures of dead fetus's all over the place.
I remember that, in general, most students treated the group with mockery at best and disdain at worst largely due to their tactics, attitude, and the fact people were more concerned with going to grab some food in one of the mess halls or chat about the latest movie or video game in the Student Center rather than having politics shoved down their throats.
There's not a doubt in my mind that if pro-life groups were being irritated ****s to other college students on campus that you'd have a large number of students purposefully and intentionally just ****ing with them by saying outrageous things they know would annoy or piss those people off.
Forgive me if I'm not buying the anecdotal evidence collected by a bunch of college pro-life groups...none of which I've ever ran into that hasn't been amazingly obnoxious...trying to portray the things said to them by a bunch of other college students as some kind of legitimate feeling on behalf of those students and not just the equivilent to trolling.
"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.