• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

School's Nation of Islam handout paints Founding Fathers as racists [W:293]

That does not negate that most races were racist. It is simple. Thinking or treating others poorly due to the colour of their skin is racist. This is an age old truth.
You don't make people slaves because of the color of their skin. As with Muslims in Africa now, you make people slaves because of disproportionate power. There has been White on White, Black on Black and everything in between. In fact you may be interested to know that the word "Slave" comes from Slav, or Slavic.

That Muslims would want the Founding Fathers of the United States portrayed as the catchall term 'racist' points out how much more clever they are than many Americans in the educational and political areas, and how these same Americans can easily ignore Muslims atrocities going on in the world today.
 
That does not negate that most races were racist. It is simple. Thinking or treating others poorly due to the color of their skin is racist. This is an age old truth.
War and the capture of slaves, or simply murdering the opposition, had nothing to do with 'racism'. This is a modern conceit, and one that is ridiculously overused.
 
Moving the goal post. Never stated slavery was OK. What you fail to accept is one should judge people during the time they lived not on today's valuses.

So should Washington be removed from rushmore?

It is noted you really didn't answer the question I asked.

What was your question?

You proceed as though slavery was widely accepted in the late 1700's and therefore it was OK to buy and sell other human beings. It may have been a much beloved institution in the South - hell they even went to war 80 years later to preserve it - but it wasn't universally accepted. There are great men of the era who were adamantly opposed to it. I remain stunned that you folks choose to give these people a free pass on slavery.
 
You don't make people slaves because of the color of their skin. As with Muslims in Africa now, you make people slaves because of disproportionate power. There has been White on White, Black on Black and everything in between. In fact you may be interested to know that the word "Slave" comes from Slav, or Slavic.

That Muslims would want the Founding Fathers of the United States portrayed as the catchall term 'racist' points out how much more clever they are than many Americans in the educational and political areas, and how these same Americans can easily ignore Muslims atrocities going on in the world today.

Black people were enslaved in this country because they were black. They were not considered real human beings and therefore slavery was a perfectly acceptable institution. To deny that is to deny the obvious.
 
As has been pointed out numerous times, social standards were different 230 years ago.

Not for John Adams and the abolitionists. Those are the people that should be heroes to you - after all, as you frequently point out, you are black.
 
Black people were enslaved in this country because they were black. They were not considered real human beings and therefore slavery was a perfectly acceptable institution. To deny that is to deny the obvious.

Slaves during that period were Black, but only because they had little in the way to defend themselves. Had they the technology then African Blacks would have taken other African Blacks as slaves, which in fact is what they did. We see Blacks in Africa using slaves today, with Boca Harem being the best known today. Boko Haram's treatment of captured Nigerian girls detailed in new report | Fox News

As we can see slavery has nothing to do with race. https://www.freetheslaves.net/SlaveryinHistory
 
Slaves during that period were Black, but only because they had little in the way to defend themselves. Had they the technology then African Blacks would have taken other African Blacks as slaves, which in fact is what they did. We see Blacks in Africa using slaves today, with Boca Harem being the best known today. Boko Haram's treatment of captured Nigerian girls detailed in new report | Fox News

As we can see slavery has nothing to do with race. https://www.freetheslaves.net/SlaveryinHistory

I'm not sure what Boko Haram has to do with educated, intelligent white men were doing in the nation that was supposedly the 'beacon of hope' for the oppressed of the world. If you talk the talk, it seems to me you ought to walk the walk. Read the Declaration of Independence with the knowledge that hundreds of thousands of black people were being treated no better than animals. Makes it ring just a little bit hollow.
 
If you talk the talk, it seems to me you ought to walk the walk. Read the Declaration of Independence with the knowledge that hundreds of thousands of black people were being treated no better than animals. Makes it ring just a little bit hollow.

That is a tension that the Founders highlighted as well. But Grant is also correct to point out that your claim that slavery=racism for them is ahistorical. Racism as a justification came after.
 
How exactly did the Founders 'highlight' this tension? What the Founders did was basically ignore it and pretend it didn't exist. The Civil War and 100 years of Jim Crow was the price paid for this hypocrisy.
 
Black people were enslaved in this country because they were black. They were not considered real human beings and therefore slavery was a perfectly acceptable institution. To deny that is to deny the obvious.

Slavery was some great ploy to keep da black man down?
 
How exactly did the Founders 'highlight' this tension? What the Founders did was basically ignore it and pretend it didn't exist. The Civil War and 100 years of Jim Crow was the price paid for this hypocrisy.

That would mean that Adams was a racist, afterall. Right?
 
How exactly did the Founders 'highlight' this tension? What the Founders did was basically ignore it and pretend it didn't exist. The Civil War and 100 years of Jim Crow was the price paid for this hypocrisy.


That is historically illiterate. The Founders said plenty about slavery, and also took what steps they could in their time to limit its' growth and attempt to put it on a glide path out.

A collection of quotes by the Founders on Slavery
"The augmentation of slaves weakens the states; and such a trade is diabolical in itself, and disgraceful to mankind."
-- George Mason

"It were doubtless to be wished, that the power of prohibiting the importation of slaves had not been postponed until the year 1808, or rather that it had been suffered to have immediate operation. But it is not difficult to account, either for this restriction on the general government, or for the manner in which the whole clause is expressed. It ought to be considered as a great point gained in favor of humanity, that a period of twenty years may terminate forever, within these States, a traffic which has so long and so loudly upbraided the barbarism of modern policy; that within that period, it will receive a considerable discouragement from the federal government, and may be totally abolished, by a concurrence of the few States which continue the unnatural traffic, in the prohibitory example which has been given by so great a majority of the Union. Happy would it be for the unfortunate Africans, if an equal prospect lay before them of being redeemed from the oppressions of their European brethren!"
-- James Madison, Federalist Paper No. 42

"Bigotry is the disease of ignorance, or morbid minds; enthusiasm of the free and buoyant. Education and free discussion are the antidotes of both."
-- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, Library of Congress, Manuscript Division, 1816

"I believe a time will come when an opportunity will be offered to abolish this lamentable evil."
-- Patrick Henry, letter to Robert Pleasants, January 18, 1773

"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free."
-- Thomas Jefferson, Autobiography, 1821

"[The Convention] thought it wrong to admit in the Constitution the idea that there could be property in men."
-- James Madison, Records of the Convention, August 25, 1787

"There is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do, to see a plan adopted for the abolition of it."
-- George Washington, letter to Robert Morris, April 12, 1786

"We have seen the mere distinction of color made in the most enlightened period of time, a ground of the most oppressive dominion ever exercised by man over man."
-- James Madison, speech at the Constitutional Convention, June 6, 1787

"Every measure of prudence, therefore, ought to be assumed for the eventual total extirpation of slavery from the United States ... I have, throughout my whole life, held the practice of slavery in ... abhorrence."
-- John Adams, letter to Robert Evans, June 8, 1819

"It is much to be wished that slavery may be abolished. The honour of the States, as well as justice and humanity, in my opinion, loudly call upon them to emancipate these unhappy people. To contend for our own liberty, and to deny that blessing to others, involves an inconsistency not to be excused."
--John Jay, letter to R. Lushington, March 15, 1786


Another of my wishes is to depend as little as possible on the labour of slaves.
-- James Madison, Letter to R. H. Lee, July 17, 1785 (Madison, 1865, I, page 161)

[W]e must deny the fact, that slaves are considered merely as property, and in no respect whatever as persons. The true state of the case is, that they partake of both these qualities: being considered by our laws, in some respects, as persons, and in other respects as property. In being compelled to labor, not for himself, but for a master; in being vendible by one master to another master; and in being subject at all times to be restrained in his liberty and chastised in his body, by the capricious will of another, the slave may appear to be degraded from the human rank, and classed with those irrational animals which fall under the legal denomination of property. In being protected, on the other hand, in his life and in his limbs, against the violence of all others, even the master of his labor and his liberty; and in being punishable himself for all violence committed against others, the slave is no less evidently regarded by the law as a member of the society, not as a part of the irrational creation; as a moral person, not as a mere article of property.
-- James Madison, Federalist, no. 54

American citizens are instrumental in carrying on a traffic in enslaved Africans, equally in violation of the laws of humanity and in defiance of those of their own country. The same just and benevolent motives which produced interdiction in force against this criminal conduct will doubtless be felt by Congress in devising further means of suppressing the evil.
-- James Madison, State of the Union,1810

It is due to justice; due to humanity; due to truth; due to the sympathies of our nature; in fine, to our character as a people, both abroad and at home, that they should be considered, as much as possible, in the light of human beings, and not as mere property. As such, they are acted on by our laws, and have an interest in our laws. They may be considered as making a part, though a degraded part, of the families to which they belong.
-- James Madison, Speech in the Virginia State Convention of 1829-30, on the Question of the Ratio of Representation in the two Branches of the Legislature, December 2, 1829.

Outlets for the freed blacks are alone wanted for the erasure of the blot from our Republican character. -- James Madison, Letter to General La Fayette, February 1, 1830.

f slavery, as a national evil, is to be abolished, and it be just that it be done at the national expense, the amount of the expense is not a paramount consideration.
-- James Madison, Letter to Robert J. Evans

In contemplating the pecuniary resources needed for the removal of such a number to so great a distance [freed slaves to Africa], my thoughts and hopes have long been turned to the rich fund presented in the western lands of the nation . . ."
-- James Madison, Letter to R. R. Gurley, December 28, 1831.

 
I'm not sure what Boko Haram has to do with educated, intelligent white men were doing in the nation that was supposedly the 'beacon of hope' for the oppressed of the world.
It has to do with naive accusations of "racism".
If you talk the talk, it seems to me you ought to walk the walk. Read the Declaration of Independence with the knowledge that hundreds of thousands of black people were being treated no better than animals. Makes it ring just a little bit hollow.
And what do you propose we do about that now? Condemn them indefinitely? Tear down Mount Rushmore? Become hysterical? Or perhaps we can use some historical perspective.
 
That is historically illiterate. The Founders said plenty about slavery, and also took what steps they could in their time to limit its' growth and attempt to put it on a glide path out.

[/I]
[/I]
This is what should be taught in the schools rather than the continual, and often unjustified, criticism of the Founding Fathers. Had more countries had these same people designing a government and Bill Of Rights, the world would be a much better place to live in today. At a minimum it could stop all the illegal immigrants entering the country from places where the people are treated with little respect at all.
 
It has to do with naive accusations of "racism".
And what do you propose we do about that now? Condemn them indefinitely? Tear down Mount Rushmore? Become hysterical? Or perhaps we can use some historical perspective.

How about just recognizing the fact that some of these people were deeply flawed human beings, and pointing it out should not be condemned. Why is it so difficult for some of you to accept that fact?
 
This is what should be taught in the schools rather than the continual, and often unjustified, criticism of the Founding Fathers. Had more countries had these same people designing a government and Bill Of Rights, the world would be a much better place to live in today. At a minimum it could stop all the illegal immigrants entering the country from places where the people are treated with little respect at all.

I don't know what school you went to, but throughout my school life I was taught that these people were demi-gods and I and my school mates were fed pablum about how they created this perfect society. It wasn't until I got to college that some of their flaws were pointed out - like owning slaves, for example. I fully admit they did some good things. But to ignore the great tragedy of this country - which is slavery - is to exist in a fantasyland.
 
That would mean that Adams was a racist, afterall. Right?

You really need to invest in a good history book. I wouldn't start on anything too advanced, however. I'm not sure you could handle it.
 
That is a tension that the Founders highlighted as well. But Grant is also correct to point out that your claim that slavery=racism for them is ahistorical. Racism as a justification came after.

They were slaves because they were black. All the denial of that fact doesn't make it untrue.
 
That is historically illiterate. The Founders said plenty about slavery, and also took what steps they could in their time to limit its' growth and attempt to put it on a glide path out.

[/I]
[/I]

How incredibly ironic that you include a quote by Jefferson, a man who owned slaves all his life and even at his death, unlike Washington, refused to free them. Of course he did have a black slave girl with whom he regularly slept, which meant he was always sure of a date on Saturday night. Maybe that was more important to him.
 
You really need to invest in a good history book. I wouldn't start on anything too advanced, however. I'm not sure you could handle it.

I'm not the one that believes slavery existed for the soul purpose of keeping the black man down and that being anti-slave is the soul qualifier to make someone immune to accusations of racism, based on 21st standards.
 
I'm not the one that believes slavery existed for the soul purpose of keeping the black man down and that being anti-slave is the soul qualifier to make someone immune to accusations of racism, based on 21st standards.

Well, let's face it. You may be the only 'black' person who actually likes the KKK. Hard to take anything you say on slavery and racism seriously.
 
Well, let's face it. You may be the only 'black' person who actually likes the KKK. Hard to take anything you say on slavery and racism seriously.



I dont think apdst is a Democrat.
 
No, he's about as far to the Right as you can get. He'd David Duke Right. And he sure does love him some KKK. Hard to believe for a 'black' guy, isn't it? Or maybe it isn't for you.
 
You don't make people slaves because of the color of their skin. As with Muslims in Africa now, you make people slaves because of disproportionate power. There has been White on White, Black on Black and everything in between. In fact you may be interested to know that the word "Slave" comes from Slav, or Slavic.

Why are you talking about slaves? Irrelevant as far as I can tell...

That Muslims would want the Founding Fathers of the United States portrayed as the catchall term 'racist' points out how much more clever they are than many Americans in the educational and political areas, and how these same Americans can easily ignore Muslims atrocities going on in the world today.

I disagree. Most Americans know that the Founding Fathers were potential racists and some slave holders but also that they were great Enlightened Thinkers that set up the foundations for one of the greatest set of documents and laws for the greatest nation ever to set foot on Earth.

You love them terrorists though...

War and the capture of slaves, or simply murdering the opposition, had nothing to do with 'racism'. This is a modern conceit, and one that is ridiculously overused.

I don't think that you have the faintest clue as to what I just said... try reading it again.

Originally Posted by Bodhisattva
That does not negate that most races were racist. It is simple. Thinking or treating others poorly due to the color of their skin is racist. This is an age old truth.
 
They were slaves because they were black. All the denial of that fact doesn't make it untrue.

No. Slavery in colonial North America included Blacks, Native Americans, and to a limited extent, Whites. Slavery is an evil system, but racism is separate from it.
 
Back
Top Bottom