• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Liberal Gun Control Activist Caught Packing Gun[W:188]

Flamethrower

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
1,043
Reaction score
187
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Missouri state Senator Jamilah Nasheed, a Democrat who has sponsored several “anti-gun” bills in her state, was arrested Monday night during a protest outside of the Ferguson Police Department. However, it’s what police officers found on her that is raising eyebrows.

Nasheed was carrying a loaded 9mm handgun and extra rounds of ammunition, according to Ferguson Police Chief Tom Jackson. She also refused to take a breathalyzer test after officers determined she “smelled strongly of intoxicants,” sources told KMOV-TV.

See Story Here:

Just Guess What Ferguson Police Found on Missouri Democrat Who Has Sponsored Several ‘Anti-Gun’ Bills

nasheed-threat.jpg

nasheed.jpg

The National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action has dubbed several pieces of legislation sponsored by Nasheed “anti-gun,” including an amendment that would require gun owners to report a firearm stolen within 72 hours.

Nasheed also reportedly pushed for a bill that would have required any “parent or guardian of a child who attends a public, private, or charter school shall notify, in writing, the superintendent of the school district, or the governing body of a private school or charter school, that such parent or guardian owns a firearm within thirty calendar days” of enrollment.
Gun Control Nut Protests At Ferguson, Gets Arrested While Possessing A Handgun - Downtrend

Please know the real position of gun control activists like Obama and Nasheed: "Guns are for me, not for thee."
 
Missouri state Senator Jamilah Nasheed, a Democrat who has sponsored several “anti-gun” bills in her state, was arrested Monday night during a protest outside of the Ferguson Police Department. However, it’s what police officers found on her that is raising eyebrows.

Nasheed was carrying a loaded 9mm handgun and extra rounds of ammunition, according to Ferguson Police Chief Tom Jackson. She also refused to take a breathalyzer test after officers determined she “smelled strongly of intoxicants,” sources told KMOV-TV.

See Story Here:

Just Guess What Ferguson Police Found on Missouri Democrat Who Has Sponsored Several ‘Anti-Gun’ Bills

View attachment 67174801

View attachment 67174802

The National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action has dubbed several pieces of legislation sponsored by Nasheed “anti-gun,” including an amendment that would require gun owners to report a firearm stolen within 72 hours.

Nasheed also reportedly pushed for a bill that would have required any “parent or guardian of a child who attends a public, private, or charter school shall notify, in writing, the superintendent of the school district, or the governing body of a private school or charter school, that such parent or guardian owns a firearm within thirty calendar days” of enrollment.
Gun Control Nut Protests At Ferguson, Gets Arrested While Possessing A Handgun - Downtrend

Please know the real position of gun control activists like Obama and Nasheed: "Guns are for me, not for thee."
secret-service-cartoon.jpg
 
She should be arrested for that statement and inciting a riot.
 
I think she should be convicted of a felony so she can't have a gun anymore, that would ironically serve the bitch right.
 
Did she sponsor a "nobody can have guns ever" bill? Because that would definitely make her a hypocrite.

(no. the answer is no.)
 
I think she should be convicted of a felony so she can't have a gun anymore, that would ironically serve the bitch right.

Yeah, what a bitch. Trying to require people to notify a school if the child owns a gun. Trying to require people to report a stolen gun within 72 hours, which is apparently "de-facto gun registration" (wait, what?). Bitch.

She clearly wants to come into your home and take your guns.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, what a bitch. Trying to require people to notify a school if the child owns a gun. Or trying to require people to report a stolen gun within 72 hours, which is apparently "de-facto gun registration" (wait, what?). Bitch.

She clearly wants to come into your home and take your guns.

An anti-gun zealot carries a gun to a protest. Your hero.
 
An anti-gun zealot carries a gun to a protest. Your hero.

Anyone who says "maybe we shouldn't allow people to own grenade launchers" is an "anti-gun zealot" to you.

(this is a fun game)
 
Oh my god, I read into this more. This ANTI GUN ZEALOT wanted the penalty for failing to notify the school that a child has access to firearms to be a fine of one hundred dollars.


The horror.
 
Did she sponsor a "nobody can have guns ever" bill? Because that would definitely make her a hypocrite.

(no. the answer is no.)

Uh, but did she inform the local school board that she had one?

Also, did she have a concealed carry permit?
 
Oh my god, I read into this more. This ANTI GUN ZEALOT wanted the penalty for failing to notify the school that a child has access to firearms to be a fine of one hundred dollars.


The horror.
It is none of the school's ****ing business if a child's parents have a gun.
 
It is none of the school's ****ing business if a child's parents have a gun.

I agree. But this hardly makes her an "anti-gun zealot." It's reactionary bull**** to school shootings, and, given the lack of any actual penalty, is largely symbolic. The real thrust of that provision was actually punishing parents who leave guns unsecured which are then used by their child to kill someone. Again, hardly zealous behavior.
 
Anyone who says "maybe we shouldn't allow people to own grenade launchers" is an "anti-gun zealot" to you.

(this is a fun game)

She shouldn't have been carrying, so the idiot got arrested. No surprising you admirer her.
 
She shouldn't have been carrying, so the idiot got arrested. No surprising you admirer her.

What did she get charged with? Why should she have not been exercising her right to bear arms?
 
Anyone who says "maybe we shouldn't allow people to own grenade launchers" is an "anti-gun zealot" to you.

(this is a fun game)

I guess in your mind a grenade launcher (ordnance) is a firearm?

the problem is-we aren't dealing with that, we are dealing with a Democrat gun restrictionist who most likely wouldn't want white conservatives carrying the same weapon she did
 
What did she get charged with? Why should she have not been exercising her right to bear arms?

are you just mad that conservatives are lampooning a Democrat?
 
are you just mad that conservatives are lampooning a Democrat?

This is pretty funny in a sad way. She certainly didn't help her cause. I liken this to Larry Craig getting caught with his pants down.
 
Last edited:
are you just mad that conservatives are lampooning a Democrat?

:lamo You should read the thread. My contention is that she is not an "anti-gun zealot." She has sponsored relatively minor "restrictions" on gun ownership, like a requirement to report stolen firearms within 72 hours of when you were "reasonably expected to know" that the firearm was stolen. Ooooh, terrifying. (and, somehow "defacto gun registration. explain that to me...)

I've seen no evidence that she has ever tried to restrict concealed carry. If you have such evidence, feel free to post it and then I will potentially call her a hypocrite.

The trouble with you guys is that you can't seem to draw a distinction between "let's not let people buy grenade launchers" and "TAKING ALL THE GUNS FOREVER." Either person gets the same label from you.
 
I guess in your mind a grenade launcher (ordnance) is a firearm?
Really? Want to quibble over semantics?

the problem is-we aren't dealing with that, we are dealing with a Democrat gun restrictionist who most likely wouldn't want white conservatives carrying the same weapon she did

Feel free to post evidence of her sponsoring a handgun ban of any kind.
 
Really? Want to quibble over semantics?



Feel free to post evidence of her sponsoring a handgun ban of any kind.

anyone who is honest about the gun control scourge in this country understands that politicians are not willing (for the most part) to come out and admit they are gun banners YET. That would cause all but those in the most brain dead districts to lose. So they incrementally seek to ban our guns by slowly advancing more and more restrictions

its the language they use. For example-if someone says WE CAN SAVE LIVES WITH A 10 round magazine limit-they are really saying a 2 round then one round limit will save more lives.

if they say we can save lives with an "assault weapon ban" (which are used in less than 2% of all gun crimes) why wouldn't they want to ban handguns which are used in the vast majority of firearm murders.
 
What did she get charged with? Why should she have not been exercising her right to bear arms?

She's a ****ing hypocrite.
 
Did she sponsor a "nobody can have guns ever" bill? Because that would definitely make her a hypocrite.

(no. the answer is no.)

and what does trying to start a race war make her?
 
She's a ****ing hypocrite.

Interesting. Can you show us what restrictive legislation she voted on? This is all that the NRA shows on its site:

NRA-ILA | Missouri De-facto Gun Owner Registry Legislation Moving In Missouri Senate Call Your Senators NOW

This modified anti-gun language would require every person to report the theft of a firearm they possess to a local law enforcement agency. Any missing firearm must be reported within 72 hours of the time he or she knew or “reasonably should have known” that the firearm had been stolen.

Hm, can you tell us how this law restricts the gun owning abilities of the average citizen? What specific part of your right to bear arms is restricted by having to report that weapons registered to you are missing? For example, if you were to lose or have your car stolen, would you not have to report it? What about... a chainsaw? You have every right to own one. However, if it was stolen, would you not have to report it? Again, I'm having trouble seeing how a law which completely releases a person from liability in the case that the gun was stolen, is a restriction on your right to bear arms.
 
and what does trying to start a race war make her?

tumblr_me5m8hivwv1rani6a.gif


Laughable nonsense.
 
What did she get charged with? Why should she have not been exercising her right to bear arms?

This story will be buried by your Lib-Com allies at CNN, MSNBC and most of the major media.

It is highly unlikely that Ms. Nasheed would have gotton a concealed carry permit---being a gun-grabbing, baby-killing-anti-White democrat. But having a concealed carry permit is the law in Missouri:

Missouri

Updated as of Tuesday, March 18, 2014.


STATE CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION

“That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or when lawfully summoned in aid of the civil power, shall not be questioned; but this shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons."

Article 1, Section 23.

NRA-ILA | Missouri

I would assume her 9mm handgun was given to her by a boyfriend or relative. What they call a "straw purchase." I wouldn't be suprised if the gun was stolen.

Senator Nasheed reminds me of the pigs in "Animal Farm" that slowly painted-over all the great laws of equality for the animals.

You see, some animals are more equal than others.
 
Back
Top Bottom