Page 9 of 23 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 222

Thread: Liberal Gun Control Activist Caught Packing Gun[W:188]

  1. #81
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:37 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,807

    re: Liberal Gun Control Activist Caught Packing Gun[W:188]

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    not true. there are hundreds of thousands of cases of crimes stopped by armed homeowners.

    do you think gay parents are somehow a danger compared to straight ones. that appears to be what you are insinuating
    No, the opposite. Gay parents pose no additional danger. Guns do.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  2. #82
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:00 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    180,700

    re: Liberal Gun Control Activist Caught Packing Gun[W:188]

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    No, the opposite. Gay parents pose no additional danger. Guns do.
    so tell me, what exactly is this information going to be used to do?

    subject the children to increased scrutiny-a clear violation

    nothing-then the law is worthless and unconstitutional

    so tell us?



  3. #83
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:55 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    10,343

    re: Liberal Gun Control Activist Caught Packing Gun[W:188]

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    No, the opposite. Gay parents pose no additional danger. Guns do.
    You, of course have data to support your opinion. On either statement.

    Please share.

  4. #84
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:37 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,807

    re: Liberal Gun Control Activist Caught Packing Gun[W:188]

    Quote Originally Posted by jimbo View Post
    You, of course have data to support your opinion. On either statement.

    Please share.
    Soon as one of you guys shares evidence of this woman supporting larger gun control measures.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  5. #85
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    42,048

    re: Liberal Gun Control Activist Caught Packing Gun[W:188]

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    when it comes to constitutional rights, the government bears a heavy burden to show that the restriction or imposition will further a clear public good. How does that law further this.
    Easy: Gun is stolen, used in a crime. This law ensures that by reporting it, liability is no longer an issue for the legal gun owner. It's no different than having to report your car stolen. You know, just in case it's used in a drive-by or something of that sort.
    your question is stupid. The duty is not on us to prove a restriction is too bad, but rather on the proponents to prove it is legitimate
    Funny, if I didn't know better - I'd say you're trying to claim that as long as you scream "You're restricting my rights!" others have to prove it doesn't. When in fact, it's also on you to prove that it does in fact restrict your rights. With that said, you claimed the laws restrict your right to bear guns. I asked how. You've spent the better part of 5 posts ducking and dodging a simple question. How does it restrict your right to bear arms? Tell us.
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

  6. #86
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:55 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    10,343

    re: Liberal Gun Control Activist Caught Packing Gun[W:188]

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Soon as one of you guys shares evidence of this woman supporting larger gun control measures.
    I never claimed she had supported other gun measures nor that she hadn't.

    So ignore the other guys, and share your information with me.

    I'll promise those other guys won't peek.

  7. #87
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:00 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    180,700

    re: Liberal Gun Control Activist Caught Packing Gun[W:188]

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    Easy: Gun is stolen, used in a crime. This law ensures that by reporting it, liability is no longer an issue for the legal gun owner. It's no different than having to report your car stolen. You know, just in case it's used in a drive-by or something of that sort. Funny, if I didn't know better - I'd say you're trying to claim that as long as you scream "You're restricting my rights!" others have to prove it doesn't. When in fact, it's also on you to prove that it does in fact restrict your rights. With that said, you claimed the laws restrict your right to bear guns. I asked how. You've spent the better part of 5 posts ducking and dodging a simple question. How does it restrict your right to bear arms? Tell us.
    fail, we are talking about the parental notification, not the reporting stolen guns. you should report a stolen gun ASAP.


    YOu can defend that twit all you want but I notice you haven't come close to telling us what that parental notification is useful and how will it be used.

    it restricts rights if people are going to be harassed or their children harassed for owning a gun

    and you have avoided telling us what good the law does

    before I have to justify why the law is bad, you best prove why it should exist in the first place



  8. #88
    Don't Give a Rat's Ass
    SMTA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    OH
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    21,862

    re: Liberal Gun Control Activist Caught Packing Gun[W:188]

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Soon as one of you guys shares evidence of this woman supporting larger gun control measures.
    Bingo!

    That's a no.

    Busted.
    Greatness lies not in being strong, but in the right use of strength - Henry Ward Beecher
    Baby sister, I was born game and I intend to go out that way - Rooster Cogburn

  9. #89
    Educator Flamethrower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Seen
    01-13-15 @ 10:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,043

    re: Liberal Gun Control Activist Caught Packing Gun[W:188]

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    The article cites two. I'm waiting for the rest. And you can't seem to tell us what restricts gun ownership in either of them.



    Lmao, invasive is up to the beholder. You've spent 3 posts bull****ting me without answering the question here.



    Funny, I have to inform schools if my kid has an allergy, needs medicines, has a special diet, can't see well, etc. None of those things restrict me from owning medicine, food or glasses. How does having to tell a school if you own guns (you know seeing how common school shootings are these days) restrict your right to own guns.
    Well---here's another biggie on Sen Nasheed Gun voing record:

    May 15, 2014

    SB 656

    Authorizes School Employees to Carry Firearms on School Property

    Conference Report Adopted - Senate
    (21 - 8)

    Nay

    And this:

    April 30, 2014

    HB 1439

    Prohibits Enforcement of Federal Firearm Regulations

    Bill Passed - Senate
    (23 - 8)

    Nay

    Title: Authorizes School Employees to Carry Firearms on School Property

    Vote Smart's Synopsis:

    Vote to override a veto of a bill that authorizes certain school employees to carry firearms on school property.

    Highlights:
    •Authorizes a school district to designate at least 1 individual who is a teacher or administrator to be a “school protection officer” and carry a concealed firearm or a self-defense spray device in any school in the district (Sec. A).
    •Requires the school board to hold a public hearing before a school district may designate a teacher or administrator as a school protection officer (Sec. A).
    •Prohibits a school district from authorizing an individual to carry a concealed firearm on school property unless the individual has a valid concealed carry permit (Sec. A).
    •Prohibits a school district from designating an individual as a school protection officer unless the individual has successfully completed a training program which includes certain topics, including, but not limited to, the following topics (Sec. A):
    •Instruction on preventing school violence;
    •Instruction on emergency or violent crisis situations; and
    •Instruction on the use of self-defense spray devices.
    •Authorizes a school protection officer to detain or use force against an individual on school property in order to prevent “imminent” injury to themselves or another individual (Sec. A).
    •Requires a school protection officer to transfer a detained individual to a school administrator or law enforcement officer as soon as possible and within no more than 1 hour (Sec. A).
    •Prohibits a school protection officer from allowing any firearm or self-defense spray device to leave their control while on school property, and classifies a violation of this provision as a class B misdemeanor (Sec. A).
    •Authorizes an individual with a valid concealed carry permit to openly carry a firearm in a jurisdiction that has an ordinance prohibiting the open carry of firearms (Sec. A).
    •Reduces the minimum age required to receive a concealed carry permit from 21 years of age to 19 years of age (Sec. A).
    •Prohibits a housing authority which receives public funds from prohibiting an occupant or guest from possessing firearms anywhere on the housing premises (Sec. A).
    •Prohibits healthcare professionals from being required to ask or maintain records about a patient’s ownership of or access to firearms (Sec. A).


    April 16, 2009

    HB 668

    Firearm Regulation Amendments

    Bill Passed - House
    (105 - 50)

    Nay
    Title: Firearm Regulation Amendments

    Vote Smart's Synopsis:

    Vote to pass a bill that lowers the minimum age for a concealed weapon permit, allows deadly force in instances of private property protection, and allows concealed firearms in any higher education institution.

    Highlights:
    -Specifies that the individual who owns or leases the private property may use deadly force, without a duty to retreat from the property, against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter private property (Sec. 563.031.2). -Lowers the minimum age requirement for obtaining a concealed carry endorsement from 23 years of age to 21 years of age (Sec. 571.101.2). -Removes the provisions prohibiting a person with a valid concealed carry endorsement or permit from carrying a concealed firearm into any higher education institution (Sec. 571.107.1). -Requires political subdivisions to regulate firearms in the same manner as the state, except that political subdivisions are allowed to prohibit illegal immigrants from selling, purchasing, transferring, owning, using, or possessing firearms, components, or ammunition (Sec. 21.750.2).

    What a raving hyporite this woman is! She has the gall to carry her own weapon on her without a licence--yet refuses to let teachers arm themselves! And she won't allow a law for you to use deadly force to protect yourself with your own weapon.

    Project Vote Smart - The Voter's Self Defense System

    Is that enough restrictions for you???????????????????????????????
    “Egotist, n. A person of low taste, more interested in himself than in me.”
    ― Ambrose Bierce, The Unabridged Devil's Dictionary

  10. #90
    Educator Flamethrower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Seen
    01-13-15 @ 10:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,043

    re: Liberal Gun Control Activist Caught Packing Gun[W:188]

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    And yet, none of you guys seem to have provided evidence of this.
    As I told your buddy Haughty, she has voted down at least two Pro-Gun, pro-self defense laws:

    Project Vote Smart - The Voter's Self Defense System
    “Egotist, n. A person of low taste, more interested in himself than in me.”
    ― Ambrose Bierce, The Unabridged Devil's Dictionary

Page 9 of 23 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •