Everything those ads claim is accurate, and I agree with them completely. The city is apparently trying to claim this is speech that falls outside the First Amendment protection under the "clear and present danger" exception--i.e, that it is calculated to and likely to create an imminent threat of lawless action. I doubt it can make that fly. Good luck to Ms. Geller and her organization. It's high time Americans started calling these lousy SOB's out for what they are. They like the idea of using violence against other people--let's see how they like wondering if some of those people may use it on them first.