Page 51 of 54 FirstFirst ... 414950515253 ... LastLast
Results 501 to 510 of 540

Thread: Boy Charged For Desecration Of Jesus Statue

  1. #501
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Boy Charged For Desecration Of Jesus Statue

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    Yes, and you are asking to prove a negative. That's like asking me to site the law that says I can legally say "Hobby Time" without going to jail. By default I'm correct unless you can show a law that says otherwise.

    Can you show where gesturing to a statue is a sexual crime?
    So you made a stupid statement since you can't back it up. You're the one that made the statement....

    I can show you NJ (my states) criminal statues which do not require nudity;
    New Jersey Statutes - Title 2C The New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice - 2C:14-2 Sexual assault. - New Jersey Attorney Resources - New Jersey Laws

    I'll show NY criminal statues which do not require nudity;
    Sexual Offenses in New York State Penal Law - Assault | Sarah Lawrence College

    I'll show CA criminal statues which do not require nudity;
    CA Codes (pen:240-248)

    Isn't it easier just to say you made a mistake?
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  2. #502
    Almost respectable

    Cardinal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    35,036

    Re: Boy Charged For Desecration Of Jesus Statue

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    So you made a stupid statement since you can't back it up. You're the one that made the statement....

    I can show you NJ (my states) criminal statues which do not require nudity;
    New Jersey Statutes - Title 2C The New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice - 2C:14-2 Sexual assault. - New Jersey Attorney Resources - New Jersey Laws

    I'll show NY criminal statues which do not require nudity;
    Sexual Offenses in New York State Penal Law - Assault | Sarah Lawrence College

    I'll show CA criminal statues which do not require nudity;
    CA Codes (pen:240-248)

    Isn't it easier just to say you made a mistake?
    Unless he exposed himself in this case, I'm not sure how it would be a sexual crime, especially seeing as how all your links either state outright or strongly imply the involvement of a victim.

  3. #503
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Boy Charged For Desecration Of Jesus Statue

    Quote Originally Posted by Cardinal View Post
    Unless he exposed himself in this case, I'm not sure how it would be a sexual crime, especially seeing as how all your links either state outright or strongly imply the involvement of a victim.
    I agree. I've already said in this case his arrest is pretty far fetched. However, my statement to TNE was regarding a generalized statement which he cannot defend and rightly so. It was an ill informed statement.
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  4. #504
    Almost respectable

    Cardinal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    35,036

    Re: Boy Charged For Desecration Of Jesus Statue

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    I agree. I've already said in this case his arrest is pretty far fetched. However, my statement to TNE was regarding a generalized statement which he cannot defend and rightly so. It was an ill informed statement.
    Not really. His position was qualified by these other posts, which when combined say exactly what I said in post 502, and which you agreed with.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    It does when it is being done to an inanimate object.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    I'm referring to this case. Do you think the kid should be put on the sexual predator list for gesturing a statue?
    (bold mine)

  5. #505
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: Boy Charged For Desecration Of Jesus Statue

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    So you made a stupid statement since you can't back it up. You're the one that made the statement....
    Nope, I was completely correct in what I said.

    I can show you NJ (my states) criminal statues which do not require nudity;
    New Jersey Statutes - Title 2C The New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice - 2C:14-2 Sexual assault. - New Jersey Attorney Resources - New Jersey Laws

    I'll show NY criminal statues which do not require nudity;
    Sexual Offenses in New York State Penal Law - Assault | Sarah Lawrence College

    I'll show CA criminal statues which do not require nudity;
    CA Codes (pen:240-248)
    All those links deal with assaults to a PERSON. All those links have person listed. Here's a hint, a statue isn't a person. Nice try, you fail.

    Isn't it easier just to say you made a mistake?
    I don't know since I'm not wrong you should be asking yourself that question. A statue isn't a person.

  6. #506
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: Boy Charged For Desecration Of Jesus Statue

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    I agree. I've already said in this case his arrest is pretty far fetched. However, my statement to TNE was regarding a generalized statement which he cannot defend and rightly so. It was an ill informed statement.
    Sorry it is YOU who cannot defend it. You are trying to say a statue is a person. Your links you listed even talked about PERSONS not statues. Hence I am correct.

  7. #507
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Boy Charged For Desecration Of Jesus Statue

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    Nope, I was completely correct in what I said.



    All those links deal with assaults to a PERSON. All those links have person listed. Here's a hint, a statue isn't a person. Nice try, you fail.



    I don't know since I'm not wrong you should be asking yourself that question. A statue isn't a person.
    The statue isn't a victim either. You made a stupid comment - now you're digging a hole with it. I'm perfectly fine letting you if that's what you want to do.
    Do everyone and yourself a favor and refrain from making stupid generalizations in the future.
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  8. #508
    Almost respectable

    Cardinal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    35,036

    Re: Boy Charged For Desecration Of Jesus Statue

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    Nope, I was completely correct in what I said.



    All those links deal with assaults to a PERSON. All those links have person listed. Here's a hint, a statue isn't a person. Nice try, you fail.



    I don't know since I'm not wrong you should be asking yourself that question. A statue isn't a person.
    But was it...statutory rape?

    Ah...haha...hahahahaha.

    Somebody already made that joke, didn't they.

  9. #509
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Boy Charged For Desecration Of Jesus Statue

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    Sorry it is YOU who cannot defend it.
    I won't defend your ill informed statement why would I. I've already show proof nudity is not a requirement for sexual assault.

    You refuse to refute that information and now claim you won. How very sad.
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  10. #510
    Sage
    Quag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Earth
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    19,025

    Re: Boy Charged For Desecration Of Jesus Statue

    Quote Originally Posted by Cardinal View Post
    But was it...statutory rape?

    Ah...haha...hahahahaha.

    Somebody already made that joke, didn't they.
    At best this post desrves a bronze.
    A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
    Winston Churchill



    A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.
    Winston Churchill

Page 51 of 54 FirstFirst ... 414950515253 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •