• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Alleged friend of the officer who shot Michael Brown calls into radio show...

Here is the video which was at your link.



If this person says is correct, the Officer was justified in shooting brown.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for posting this.
We recently had a case here locally where a man who was trying to cash a bad check at a bank was stopped by a plain clothes cop and took off running. The cop chased him for a long distance [even commandeering a car] then eventually became involved in a scuffle with the individual where the officers gun went off, killing the perp.

The city decided it was best to give the family $1.25 million before the trial of the officer ever began, pretty much sealing his fate.

This and the local decision are perfect examples of knee-jerk reactions before the facts are known.
 
It will be interesting to see what forensics come up with. The scenario presented in the video certainly seems plausible and Brown's behavior on the surveillance tape would indicate an attitude of hostility toward authority which coincides with the officer's take on his state of mind.

I suspect that if toxicology tests on Brown come back as positive for some kind of intoxicant the cop will not be found guilty. On the other hand, I foresee this case going to trial no matter what.
 
Interesting. I just listened to it. What's is The Dana Show?

Could what she said be true? I guess we'll find out.

I think it was the spouse. She knew alot about the exact story without hesitating. When I hear stories from another person who heard it from another person, some details get lost. She seemed very sure about the events and what happened. Not saying everyone is like me, but like a game of telephone alot of times things can get mixed up here and there.
 
A third party calling into a radio station is not the other side's story. The other side is the officer's testimony.

Not necessarily.
It is third person, yes. But the information comes from the person's side of the story.
 
I think it was the spouse. She knew alot about the exact story without hesitating. When I hear stories from another person who heard it from another person, some details get lost. She seemed very sure about the events and what happened. Not saying everyone is like me, but like a game of telephone alot of times things can get mixed up here and there.

You could be right. If I heard something from someone who heard it from someone, I would have a hard time repeating it with confidence. That could be his wife or girlfriend.
 
Not necessarily.
It is third person, yes. But the information comes from the person's side of the story.

Yes and when we all recall events, we tend to see it from our side, not the other side. Your side of the story is going to make yourself look good. Not saying it's not true but until all the facts come out, it's hard to believe either side at this point.
 
You could be right. If I heard something from someone who heard it from someone, I would have a hard time repeating it with confidence. That could be his wife or girlfriend.
It could even have been Excon or Josie.
 
Interesting. I just listened to it. What's is The Dana Show?

Could what she said be true? I guess we'll find out.

I mean it could be. The reason why I do not put a lot of stock into what the friend says has nothing to do with her or the officer's credibility, but rather it is hearsay and is pretty unreliable because details can be lost in hearing the story or things could be changed in order to get a certain point of view across.
 
I mean it could be. The reason why I do not put a lot of stock into what the friend says has nothing to do with her or the officer's credibility, but rather it is hearsay and is pretty unreliable because details can be lost in hearing the story or things could be changed in order to get a certain point of view across.

It could be or it could be a hoax too. But it was interesting to listen to it.
 
Yes and when we all recall events, we tend to see it from our side, not the other side. Your side of the story is going to make yourself look good. Not saying it's not true but until all the facts come out, it's hard to believe either side at this point.
No. It isn't hard to believe this third person's recounting of what she was told as being accurate.
It is far more plausible than the person involved with the robbery. As his version seems contrived.


This person saying that Brown is a good kid who didn't do ****, he don't start ****, and is a most respectful person is absolutely hilarious given the store's video we saw.
 
Last edited:
It could be or it could be a hoax too. But it was interesting to listen to it.

Yeah it was interesting and it is just another thing to take into account about the entire situation. I can say this for sure though, this story has turned into a ****show.
 
Interesting. I just listened to it. What's is The Dana Show?

Could what she said be true? I guess we'll find out.

Dana is from MO and lived in St. Louis up until this year. She's now in Dallas working for The Blaze.
 
Here is the video which was at your link.



If this person says is correct, the Officer was justified in shooting brown.


Seven seconds in...

It says "Josie" on my call screener".

OMG the people in this forum sink to depths I never would have thought. I never thought someone would call a radio station pretending they know someone in the media just to prove their point on the internet but hey. Good work "Josie".:lamo
 
Back
Top Bottom