• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Alleged friend of the officer who shot Michael Brown calls into radio show...

Excon said:
No. It isn't hard to believe this third person's recounting of what she was told as being accurate.
It is far more plausible than the person involved with the robbery. As his version seems contrived.


This person saying that Brown is a good kid who didn't do ****, he don't start ****, and is a most respectful person is absolutely hilarious given the store's video we saw.
Click to expand...


He might be a good kid compared to all the other kids in his neighborhood. If your surrounded by murderers and drug dealers.... a theif probably would be a good person relatively speaking.
 
reinoe said:
If I'm making up a story I probably wouldn't want to connect it to anyone either. Of course she had her story straight: there's no evidence to contradict it just yet...but there's already cracks in it...

Sister, significant other, girlfriend, forum user who crank calls radio stations...
Click to expand...

When you have protests of mass violence in which people are willing to rob and kill, I don't think you want your name out there on the side of the people they want to rob and kill. She is using a little thing called, her brain... Something people on the other side of this issue seem to not be using.
 
Caine said:
How do you get shot in the head, and then you still have the ability to be on your knees with your hands up for long enough for someone to walk around to your back side and shoot you in the back 4-5 times?
Click to expand...

You have the forensic report already before anyone else... How come your not a millionaire!! If I had that information I would be selling it to every news outlet I could make money from.
 
Caine said:
How do you get shot in the head, and then you still have the ability to be on your knees with your hands up for long enough for someone to walk around to your back side and shoot you in the back 4-5 times?
Click to expand...
Yep...thats a mystery for sure. Especially considering the individual that offered the eyewitness account swears he was RIGHT THERE...man...sweartagod!!!
 
Capster78 said:
You have the forensic report already before anyone else... How come your not a millionaire!! If I had that information I would be selling it to every news outlet I could make money from.
Click to expand...
You might be missing the point.

No...you are DEFINITELY missing the point.
 
Capster78 said:
If you take one story over the other, you are clearly biased and should be ignored. There are two sides, only one of which has been proven to have credibility issues.
Click to expand...

If you take one story over the other, you are biased. Now here's why I'm taking one story...
 
Deuce said:
If you take one story over the other, you are biased. Now here's why I'm taking one story...
Click to expand...

I change my opinion based on the evidence. And so far, the evidence suggests one side has a big credibility issue. Other then stating that the person doing the shooting was a police officer, being a police officer; contrary to popular beliefe, does not make a person guilty. No more then being black makes a person guilty. Sometimes I wonder if some of these race baiters are really using their brains at all. They don't want us to use racial bias against them to profile them, yet they profile police officers..... Scratches head....
 
Capster78 said:
When you have protests of mass violence in which people are willing to rob and kill, I don't think you want your name out there on the side of the people they want to rob and kill. She is using a little thing called, her brain... Something people on the other side of this issue seem to not be using.
Click to expand...
If she was using her brain she wouldn't have called in the first place. Now the officer is in deep for discussing this shooting with someone he never should have been discussing it with.

Or we can assume that the officer involved is a professional and he kept his mouth shut, and if that's the case then this woman who called in has to be liar.
 
reinoe said:
Now the officer is in deep for discussing this shooting with someone he never should have been discussing it with.
Click to expand...
That is an assertion that has not been substantiated in any way.
So let me add, if she was told, while it is likely inappropriate, I seriously doubt he will be held accountable for telling a significant other what happened in his life.
 
reinoe said:
If she was using her brain she wouldn't have called in the first place. Now the officer is in deep for discussing this shooting with someone he never should have been discussing it with.

Or we can assume that the officer involved is a professional and he kept his mouth shut, and if that's the case then this woman who called in has to be liar.
Click to expand...

Or, he could've confided in his spouse or significant other wanting to get some of it off his chest (killing someone) and didn't think or know they would tell someone else who would then call a radio station... or I could be completely wrong.... :2wave:
 
reinoe said:
If she was using her brain she wouldn't have called in the first place. Now the officer is in deep for discussing this shooting with someone he never should have been discussing it with.

Or we can assume that the officer involved is a professional and he kept his mouth shut, and if that's the case then this woman who called in has to be liar.
Click to expand...

She was using her brain. That is why she called the radio station to discuss the issue. In fact, she may have saved many lives by doing so. If the other side of the story is not heard, then the looting and killing by the protesters continues, rallied on by the usual race baiters. If some doubt is put into the credibility of the rioters, it will weed out the ignoramouses that simply got caught up in the media attention and the ignoramouses that are just simply criminals using it as a means to be criminals.
 
Excon said:
That is an assertion that has not been substantiated in any way.
So let me add, if she was told, while it is likely inappropriate, I seriously doubt he will be held accountable for telling a significant other what happened in his life.
Click to expand...
The he was talking about this shooting when he's not supposed to have been doing so? I'm pretty sure if this "friend" has details about the case he had to have been talking about the shooting or this caller is lying and making **** up. So there is a 100% chance one of these things happened. I don't need it to be substantiated that one of these two things took place.
Derp said:
Or, he could've confided in his spouse or significant other wanting to get some of it off his chest (killing someone) and didn't think or know they would tell someone else who would then call a radio station... or I could be completely wrong.... :2wave:
Click to expand...
So he's an unprofessional. And if he's an unprofessional in one way then he probably handled the shooting unprofessionally as well.
Capster78 said:
She was using her brain. That is why she called the radio station to discuss the issue. In fact, she may have saved many lives by doing so. If the other side of the story is not heard, then the looting and killing by the protesters continues, rallied on by the usual race baiters. If some doubt is put into the credibility of the rioters, it will weed out the ignoramouses that simply got caught up in the media attention and the ignoramouses that are just simply criminals using it as a means to be criminals.
Click to expand...
That's a goddamn stretch and you know it. She's saving lives by talking about something she shouldn't have any information about?

Now that the usual suspects have come out of the woodwork does anyone else have anything to say about this "friend" who called in?
 
reinoe said:
The he was talking about this shooting when he's not supposed to have been doing so? I'm pretty sure if this "friend" has details about the case he had to have been talking about the shooting or this caller is lying and making **** up. So there is a 100% chance one of these things happened. I don't need it to be substantiated that one of these two things took place.
Click to expand...
You're sure?
iLOL
:doh
:lamo
You thinking he is, does not dictate if he is.
So yes, it does need to be substantiated. Simply because he may not be in it deep.
 
Last edited:
Ikari said:
This is also why we should just start requiring cops to wear cameras as part of the uniform. If we can record these situations, it would go a long way into stopping the knee jerk reactions and allow us to properly assess the situation. If course it wouldn't be a 100% guarantee, but it would likely go quite far into clearing many these things up.
Click to expand...

I can't remember where I was at--maybe in Texas--and saw a police unit that had 360 degree video installed on the car.

If I was a cop, I would want everything I do captured on video.
 
shrubnose said:
This is second-hand hearsay evidence. IOW: It's BS.
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
It's second-hand hearsay BS.
Click to expand...

Second hand, third party, hearsay. Yes.
"Bs"? Not necessarily so.

What she related of his account is far more believable than what the cohort said in his video.

Especially as it matches up with other information.


His moving toward the officer?
An eye witness basically saying the same thing that has been reported.
The Conservative Treehouse said:

@6:28/6:29 of video

#1 How’d he get from there to there?

#2 Because he ran, the police was still in the truck – cause he was like over the truck

{crosstalk}

#2 But him and the police was both in the truck, then he ran – the police got out and ran after him

{crosstalk}

#2 Then the next thing I know he doubled back toward him cus - the police had his gun drawn already on him –

#1. Oh, the police got his gun

#2 The police kept dumpin on him, and I’m thinking the police kept missing – he like – be like – but he kept coming toward him

{crosstalk}

#2 Police fired shots – the next thing I know – the police was missing

#1 The Police?

#2 The Police shot him

#1 Police?

#2 The next thing I know … I’m thinking … the dude started running … (garbled something about “he took it from him”)

The “JJ Witness Video” – Eye Witness Audio of Mike Brown Shooting States: “Brown Doubled Back Toward POlice”… | The Last Refuge
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Excon said:


​

Second hand, third party, hearsay. Yes.
"Bs"? Not necessarily so.

What she related of his account is far more believable than what the cohort said in his video.

Especially as it matches up with other information.


His moving toward the officer?
An eye witness basically saying the same thing that has been reported.
Click to expand...

I like how the video starts out... that they had no reason to shoot the guy.. The one lady said she was in the shower and heard the shots. She did not witness anything. The guy holding the camera came out after everything happened... But apparently they KNEW the police officers had NO REASON to kill the guy. This in itself shows that this entire neighborhood simply hates police officers. No matter what the reason would be, it would not justify the shooting of this guy to them.
 
Capster78 said:
I like how the video starts out... that they had no reason to shoot the guy.. The one lady said she was in the shower and heard the shots. She did not witness anything. The guy holding the camera came out after everything happened... But apparently they KNEW the police officers had NO REASON to kill the guy. This in itself shows that this entire neighborhood simply hates police officers. No matter what the reason would be, it would not justify the shooting of this guy to them.
Click to expand...
It is that background witness that reveals the cohorts story to be false and confirms some of the the officers version as recounted by the third party.


The Officers pic has been revealed through a Facebook image.
I wonder how long before someone posts it?
 
Capster78 said:
You have the forensic report already before anyone else... How come your not a millionaire!! If I had that information I would be selling it to every news outlet I could make money from.
Click to expand...

Did you read what I replied to?

Reading is fundamental.
 
reinoe said:
If she was using her brain she wouldn't have called in the first place. Now the officer is in deep for discussing this shooting with someone he never should have been discussing it with.

Or we can assume that the officer involved is a professional and he kept his mouth shut, and if that's the case then this woman who called in has to be liar.
Click to expand...

Do you seriously think that an Officer isn't going to discuss such a situation with his significant other??? Could you refuse to speak to them about it if it was you?

I know I couldn't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom