Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 43 of 43

Thread: DOJ loses NC voter ID case in federal court.

  1. #41

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    South Coast
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:28 PM

    Re: DOJ loses NC voter ID case in federal court.

    Quote Originally Posted by NonoBadDog View Post
    I find it ironic that people had to show their ID 4 (four) times to get into the DNC convention in but they are pushing for no ID for voting. Amazing, just freaking amazing.
    Who's pushing for NO ID for voting?

    ID requirements for voter registration is clearly spelled out in the HAVA act of 2002, sec. 303.

    If a simple photo ID was all that is required and everything possible was done to insure someone acquires said ID, I believe there would be very little pushback. It's all the garbage attached to these ID bills that cause some to not be able to comply or very difficult to comply, is what has people up in arms.

    Making it easier for every eligible voter in the U.S. to vote should be the goal, not erecting hoops and hurdles to discourage even one eligible voter to become discouraged from voting.

    Here's an investigation that found 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast.

    A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast - The Washington Post

    That's a fraud rate of 0.00002%. Is that worth it if it causes even one eligible voter to not be able to cast their ballot?
    “I’m worried that I will be the last Republican president.” - George W. Bush

  2. #42
    eohrnberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:13 AM
    Blog Entries

    Re: DOJ loses NC voter ID case in federal court.

    Well, so much for Attorney General Activism. But i have no illusions that Holder and his DOJ is going to continue to try and be activists for all these wrong headed, ideological ideas. Probably a good thing that he didn't (and doesn't) succeed.
    Nancy Pelosi said: “We have to pass it, to find out what’s in it.” A Doctor called to a radio show & said: "That's the definition of a stool sample"
    "Under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket," Barack Obama January 2008

  3. #43
    mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    DC Metro
    Last Seen
    06-13-16 @ 06:00 PM

    Re: DOJ loses NC voter ID case in federal court.

    Quote Originally Posted by Simon W. Moon View Post
    In any case, the judge seems to think that he has denied motions from the defendant and the plaintiff.

    "After careful consideration, the court concludes that Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings should be denied in its entirety."
    "Consequently, the motions for preliminary injunction and the United States’ request for federal observers will be denied."
    motion for judgement on the pleadings was the defendant asking the judge to end it entirely. The judge decided not to, while denying the plaintiffs motion to enjoin (which is what this case was for). So, if the plaintiff so chooses, they can bring the motion to court without getting the injunction they were looking for.
    ”People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.” --- Ben Franklin

    Quote Originally Posted by The German View Post
    Sterotypes are mostly based on truths.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts