iLOL Please then, explain why you thought I was addressing someone being shot in the back, when it was more than clear I was addressing in-general standards that the police and civilians are held to.
Originally Posted by Black Dog
Or in it's stead, you can admit that you were wrong, as previously pointed out.
And then while you are at it, you can address the following as well.
Being caught up in the moment in this case was clearly him thinking he was defending himself against violent criminals.
Thinking you are defending yourself is not an act of vengeance, but acting in self-defense.
He believed he was acting in self-defense, and, being caught-up in the moment, continued to operate under such belief.
That would be Occam's razor as applied to the known information.
And then after you explain how being caught up in the moment of self-defense is somehow acting on vengeance (this I got to here), you can then address how in the world you think his being caught up in the moment of self-defense somehow translates into wanting to send a message? (got to hear this one as well)
Or instead, you can just admit your comments were wrong and were nothing more than the results of thinking gone wrong.