You may think he had a moral right to do that. But California law gives him no legal right to have used deadly force to stop them from getting away. I doubt any other state's law does, either.He had a right to stop his attackers from getting away.
That's an interesting opinion, but again, it does not reflect the law. You may want to see criminal laws changed to impose a death penalty for that kind of battery, but if so, I don't like your chances.Anyone willing to beat an elderly person deserves to die.
The last time I went in for jury duty, I heard several people tell the judge they didn't want to be there. He didn't seem to care much. And luckily for us, anyone who expresses your prejudice will probably be booted from the jury by the defense anyway--it makes no sense to try people charged with crimes if the jurors have the case decided before the trial begins. Somehow I doubt you'd want jurors who share your view if you were charged with a crime you hadn't committed.I have a job and made it clear I had no interest in being there. I was not interested in hearing some scumbag give piss poor excuses for their behavior.
Fact is I have no problem with an investigation, trial, and jury call. YOU are the one that wants someone to get a free pass for shooting.
But please, defend and make excuses for and allow scumbag criminals to hide behind the law. Maybe next week end YOU may have an elderly parent that gets his head caved in. Then you can tell me what you want done.
Good job, you also ran from the issue to make this about me. Son, learn how to stay on topic. Son, learn what is going on with the criminal justice system. Till then keep making every thread about the posters and nothing about the topic. I see that is what you are good at, son.