both of which still prove the point being made A) Saddam still had legacy WMD and B) he did not have ongoing production programs.Some arty pro-jos tested positive but were 'rebranded' shells filled with explosives. I can only find 2 cases where an IED tested positive for chem AND apparently were so degraded they failed to be lethal
that is correct. The 1,000 or so side-stored radioactive materials found with it were what could be used for dirty bombs - the main purpose for enriched uranium is nuclear energy, either slow and steady out of a plant, or all of a sudden out of a bomb.Did you read the Faux Noise article you cite? 2 tons of 3-5% uranium that CAN'T be used for a dirty bomb..
I don't have to counter it. It's naive idiocy is at this point rather self-apparent. I might as well suggest that Obama was deliberately lying when his administration gave us the unemployment projections for the stimulus. It's not that he was lying - it's that he was wrong, and wrong largely because he'd been informed wrongly by the experts, who themselves had good reasons for being wrong.The 2007 CIA report on the 'facility' claims the buildings are razed, the equipment destroyed, and the chem stockpiles are old damaged and contaminated.
You have done ZERO to counter the simplistic chant- 'Bush lied and good troops died'...