Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 90

Thread: Charles Krauthammer backs Bowe Bergdahl deal[W:30]

  1. #51
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    is everything
    Last Seen
    02-19-17 @ 09:50 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    4,810

    Re: Charles Krauthammer backs Bowe Bergdahl deal[W:30]

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Their considered Terrorists
    Yes, they are. I take it yer gonna drop this "non-combatant" nonsense without admitting you were wrong.

    >>and they are on the National Counter Terrorism Agency's List

    The National Counterterrorism Center maintains a list of known and suspected terrorists. This is aka the "watch list." And the agency has indeed identified a number of groups (about two dozen) as terrorist organizations. I've never heard this collection referred to as a "list." Perhaps you can provide a link to someone who does.

    >>Well that's what all those threads are about.....and what I have in them.

    So you want me to wade through a lot of garbage to find out what I already know — that the Afghan Taliban has been identified by the NCTC as a terrorist group. Seems wholly unnecessary.

    >>Eventually you will learn about who and who doesn't put content up around here.

    Well I have learned in this thread that you put up a lot of confused nonsense.

    You claim that there is some relevance in this context to the fact that the US IC has labelled the Taliban as terrorists. I say there is none. Have we been fighting a war in Afghanistan? Were we engaged in combat operations against the Afghan Taliban? If the answer is yes, I'm confident that it makes sense to call Bergdahl a POW.

    Offer me some content here: Were Americans taken prisoner by the Viet Cong?

  2. #52
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Charles Krauthammer backs Bowe Bergdahl deal[W:30]

    Quote Originally Posted by mmi View Post
    Yes, they are. I take it yer gonna drop this "non-combatant" nonsense without admitting you were wrong.

    >>and they are on the National Counter Terrorism Agency's List

    The National Counterterrorism Center maintains a list of known and suspected terrorists. This is aka the "watch list." And the agency has indeed identified a number of groups (about two dozen) as terrorist organizations. I've never heard this collection referred to as a "list." Perhaps you can provide a link to someone who does.

    >>Well that's what all those threads are about.....and what I have in them.

    So you want me to wade through a lot of garbage to find out what I already know — that the Afghan Taliban has been identified by the NCTC as a terrorist group. Seems wholly unnecessary.

    >>Eventually you will learn about who and who doesn't put content up around here.

    Well I have learned in this thread that you put up a lot of confused nonsense.

    You claim that there is some relevance in this context to the fact that the US IC has labelled the Taliban as terrorists. I say there is none. Have we been fighting a war in Afghanistan? Were we engaged in combat operations against the Afghan Taliban? If the answer is yes, I'm confident that it makes sense to call Bergdahl a POW.

    Offer me some content here: Were Americans taken prisoner by the Viet Cong?

    In the Immortal words of every known Democrat.....I misspoke. Yeah No kidding that's what I told you. So you aren't telling anyone anything other than repeating what you were told.

    No.....that's so you can become accustom as to who puts up content and who doesn't. Although we can see why you would want to avoid them. Not much those on the left can play with. My Norm wherever I roam.

    Moreover he wasn't listed as POW......when he Deserted.

    Also the Taliban are not the ruling governmental authority in Afghanistan.....ya can check it out with their Embassy people and their Affairs Office. No need to get back to me once you do.

    Oh and all that are deflection, going off tangent and you writing books. You aren't the first and you wont be the last. Especially sporting that Liberal Coat you wearin. Just sayin.

  3. #53
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    is everything
    Last Seen
    02-19-17 @ 09:50 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    4,810

    Re: Charles Krauthammer backs Bowe Bergdahl deal[W:30]

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    I misspoke.
    Don't feel bad. At least you had an excuse for that part of yer collection of errors.

    >>content

    Mindless drivel.

    >>Moreover he wasn't listed as POW......when he Deserted.

    The Pentagon has never labelled him a deserter. Yer full of it.

    >>Also the Taliban are not the ruling governmental authority in Afghanistan

    That is irrelevant. For two days Bergdahl was listed by the Pentagon as missing. Since then, he's been listed as captured — seized as the result of action of an unfriendly military or paramilitary force in a foreign country. You have yer view, and the Army has its view.

    >>Just sayin.

    With no import whatsoever.

  4. #54
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Powhatan County, VA.
    Last Seen
    08-01-14 @ 09:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    657

    Re: Charles Krauthammer backs Bowe Bergdahl deal[W:30]

    "Charles Krauthammer"s real name is "Shekky Kraummer" or something. I wonder why he selected "Krauthammer" for his new name......

    Fox News makes me want to vomit the way they worship him like he's some kind of an Einstein genius or something. And all you Foxnews viewers believe everything he says without question.

    "Krauthammer" is nothing but a Pro-Israel (which is why he supports the exchange because Israel does it) neocon warmonger just like the rest of the Foxnews "Contributors".

  5. #55
    The Dude
    Kobie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Western NY
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    42,919

    Re: Charles Krauthammer backs Bowe Bergdahl deal[W:30]

    Quote Originally Posted by Mosby View Post
    "Charles Krauthammer"s real name is "Shekky Kraummer" or something. I wonder why he selected "Krauthammer" for his new name......

    Fox News makes me want to vomit the way they worship him like he's some kind of an Einstein genius or something. And all you Foxnews viewers believe everything he says without question.

    "Krauthammer" is nothing but a Pro-Israel (which is why he supports the exchange because Israel does it) neocon warmonger just like the rest of the Foxnews "Contributors".
    Charles Krauthammer's given name is ... wait for it ... Charles Krauthammer.
    Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism.

  6. #56
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Charles Krauthammer backs Bowe Bergdahl deal[W:30]

    Quote Originally Posted by mmi View Post
    Don't feel bad. At least you had an excuse for that part of yer collection of errors.

    >>content

    Mindless drivel.

    >>Moreover he wasn't listed as POW......when he Deserted.

    The Pentagon has never labelled him a deserter. Yer full of it.

    >>Also the Taliban are not the ruling governmental authority in Afghanistan

    That is irrelevant. For two days Bergdahl was listed by the Pentagon as missing. Since then, he's been listed as captured — seized as the result of action of an unfriendly military or paramilitary force in a foreign country. You have yer view, and the Army has its view.

    >>Just sayin.

    With no import whatsoever.
    Try again!!!!!

    I never said he was labeled a Deserter.....go back and look at what link I have up and it explains their investigation.

    The Taliban isn't ruling Afghanistan and yet you call this irrelevant.....yeah whatever MMI Its clear you don't have a clue as to what you are talking about.

    Trust me you will have to do a lot better at trolling than this.

  7. #57
    pawn in the game of life
    pragmatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    10-17-17 @ 05:33 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    1,984

    Re: Charles Krauthammer backs Bowe Bergdahl deal[W:30]

    Quote Originally Posted by mtm1963 View Post
    we value life, they(the taliban)DO NOT!!

    charles has it right.
    It's good for those in the discussion to read ALL of Krauthammer's position on the issue. He in no way approved of the way Obama handled/botched this whole operation.

    Charles Krauthammer: Free Bowe Bergdahl, then try him - The Washington Post


    (Hey MTM...nice to see you.)




    //


    “Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.”

  8. #58
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    is everything
    Last Seen
    02-19-17 @ 09:50 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    4,810

    Re: Charles Krauthammer backs Bowe Bergdahl deal[W:30]

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    The Taliban isn't ruling Afghanistan and yet you call this irrelevant.....yeah whatever MMI Its clear you don't have a clue as to what you are talking about.
    Were Americans taken prisoner by the Viet Cong?

  9. #59
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Charles Krauthammer backs Bowe Bergdahl deal[W:30]

    Quote Originally Posted by mmi View Post
    Were Americans taken prisoner by the Viet Cong?
    It has nothing to do with this issue.....The Taliban are terrorists.....Bergdahl is a deserter, and now we have a Body. Article 32 will take place. So you can keep your deflection and while you're at it. You can hang here thinking you know something something. Most who know whats up have moved on.

    But really you might want to check out where things are at in current time. Just sayin!

  10. #60
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    is everything
    Last Seen
    02-19-17 @ 09:50 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    4,810

    Re: Charles Krauthammer backs Bowe Bergdahl deal[W:30]

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    The Taliban isn't ruling Afghanistan
    Were the Viet Cong "ruling" South Vietnam when they took Americans prisoner in that country and held them as POWs?

    >>You can hang here thinking you know something

    I know something you apparently don't know — how to be logically consistent. It's a concept taught in freshman philosophy classes.

Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •