Re: Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists
You show me where I called you a liar and I'll apologize accordingly.
Playing behind the ole "bias partisans" flame is like a left wing partisan hack suggesting they are a moderate on a forum.
I await your apology.
Stating your opinion is wrong is my right.
Yes, but calling me a liar is still a personal attack.
Hilda uttered the words for all to hear. I don't even put them in context
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :lamo:lamo
Oh my God...how in the hell do you not understand that's EXACTLY the point I'm making! Holy crap, you just made my point for me. You aren't interested in context, you don't care what she actually said, you just want to twist her words into a way your political team can use for a victory.
Unbelievable, I never thought someone would actually admit they don't care about the context of words when they are blatantly twisting them into something they are not. That cracked me up. Thank you for proving exactly what I've been saying this whole thread.
and only one so extreme as to blindly defend her at all costs to their integrity would try to apply her words to a context that doesn't matter.
:lamo
Seriously, you have to stop now, my side is hurting from laughing so much. The fact you are now saying that only extreme people care about putting words into the proper context shows you for exactly what you are. Only someone playing team politics or an incredibly dishonest person would take words out of context intentionally just to smear someone else because they don't agree with the letter behind their name. People who care about the truth will ALWAYS want to know the context of what is said.
Obviously you don't care about the truth, you just want to wear the Republican cheerleading costume. At least you're willing to admit it.
Right. He wanted the truth.
He got the truth. He just didn't get the "truth" he wanted.
In every answer she is evading. I was watching it real time, I saw it plain as day.
Then, much like Johnson, you only saw and heard what you wanted to hear. I watched it in real time as well, she gave direct answers to the best of her ability. You're just playing partisan games at this point.
The revisions have been lied about...and there is now every indication that these "revisions" were essentially revising a blank piece of paper into talking points.
No, there is not. Just because you don't like the truth, you're not entitled to make up your own and call it fact.
BS. Those answers don't answer anything
They answered the questions directly.
that's why she was pressed until she had her fit.
If that were true, how come he didn't continue to press her? She didn't say anything in her last paragraph she hadn't already said, why didn't he continue to press her?
Your answer is BS and we both know it.
Everything she has said regarding Benghazi is offensive.
Every lie being told about what she said is offensive to anyone interested in the truth.