Re: Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists
Translation: Benghazi, Nigeria, etc.....excuse me while I bury my head in the sand.
You're terrible at translating if you think your translation is anywhere close to what I said. As in, it may be the worst translation I've ever seen. Seriously, that was terrible. You need to go back to translation school if you think your translation has anything to do with what I said.
The amusing part is you don't have to translate anything at all, I say it clearly. People who dishonestly take that quote out of context and pretend it is something it's not are biased partisans who kill all credibility in anything else they may say on that particular matter.
The poster's partisanship has no impact on Hillary's incompetence.
It does when deciding whether we should take the partisan poster's opinion of Hillary's competence seriously.
In this case, when people dishonestly quote her out of context, it makes it clear no credibility should be given. I really don't understand why it's so hard for people to simply do things in an honest fashion.
I saw the video of that testimony and she said that out of anger because she was being grilled over Benghazi.
Yeah, I was watching it as it happened. I saw the full context. And she said that, not out of anger of being grilled over Benghazi, but in anger of how the Republicans were using the deaths of 4 Americans as a political talking point, instead of grilling her on the measures being taken to make sure it didn't happen again.
If you actually read her full quote (or watch the video), it's pretty clear why she's upset. She had already answered the question being asked multiple times, but the person grilling her wouldn't accept her answer. He kept wanting to make it political, when that's not what that setting should have been. That setting should have been about what went wrong with security and how to make sure it never happens again.
His use of that quote isn't far off
It's completely off.
and I find it amusing how the Hillary asskissers and apologists
I'm neither an asskisser nor an apologists, I'm simply someone interested in facts. People who dishonestly quote her out of context are not interested in facts, they are interested in cheap partisan points.
constantly find reasons to minimize her ****ed up attitude over the entire Benghazi scandal.
Yes, how awful of her to want to talk about ways to prevent more American casualties! Republicans need to win elections, dammit! What's the matter with Clinton, doesn't she know Republicans need to politicize their deaths to win elections?
The only ****ed up attitude over Benghazi are what Republicans are doing. They are using the deaths of Americans for political purposes. Everyone now knows what happened and we all know why it happened. We know why the aftermath was shaped as it was. Republicans keep bleating about Benghazi because it probably scores well in political polls.
That woman has been as worthless as a pimple on a duck's ass since the day she was born.
And yet, this one incident aside, Hillary has been highly regarded across the country and in many parts of the world as a terrific Secretary of State. But I'm guessing facts don't really matter to people only interested in team politics.
If she hadn't been married to Bill Clinton she's probably still be at some law firm
Probably. But I fail to see what that has to do with anything. For example, if you were objective and not obviously biased, you'd probably agree with me about being frustrated by people who dishonestly take her quote out of context. If Ted Cruz were black, he probably wouldn't be a Republican Senator from Texas.
We can play the "if" game all day long. I'm far more interested in reality.