What's sad is how you won't admit you were wrong, when it is indisputably clear you were.Very sad.
A lie? Do you even know what that word means? Only a blind partisan would say providing direct evidence is a lie.One last point on your lie
What does that have to do with anything? You're used quite a few of fallacious arguments already in this thread. I guess there's nothing quite like a red herring in the afternoon..... who is in charge of U.S. Consulates ??? Could it be the State Department. Who was in charge of the State Department.
But a consulate is NOT an embassy.A consulate is part of an embassy.
The consulate was attacked. Embassies around the Middle East were the target of hate. This is EXACTLY what Hillary said. Attempts to spin are sad.
Why would you bother repeating a lie I've already disproven? Is that really the dishonest tactic you wish to employ to try and get around the fact you're wrong?Your attempt to claim she was not talking about Benghazi in a memorial for the Americans killed in Benghazi is disgusting.
I never said she wasn't talking about Benghazi as the focus of her speech. What I DID say is she never said Benghazi was attacked because of the video and to prove it I showed where she clearly separated out what happened at the consulate in Benghazi and what happened at other embassies.
Says the person tossing out strawman arguments, red herrings and repeating lies already disproven.then why don't you start by telling the truth.
Another lie.Another denial.
I did read the posts. I even put them in order for you. How can you still not understand, when I even repeated them in order?You should really try reading the posts
And then went on to ask why she didn't promise to go after the real perpetrators. I responded to that by saying (paraphrase) "hasn't enough people already done so" and you replied (paraphrased) "yes like Clinton and Obama".I said Clinton told the parents that she would make sure the video author would be taken care of.
You're drowning in this argument and no amount of directionless flailing will bring your head above water on this one. The evidence is clear right before you.
Good try, but once again you're wrong.She never told them directly that day that she or anyone else would bring the murderers to justice.
http://www.state.gov/secretary/20092.../09/197780.htmOriginally Posted by Hillary
Of course, both her and Obama made empty promises AFTER the memorial that the murderers would be taken care of, then never lifted a finger to actually do it.
So once again you admit she has said she'd go after the real murderers! Holy crap, I don't know that I've ever seen anyone torpedo their own argument as much as you've done in this thread.
At the end of the day you were provably wrong about her blaming Benghazi on the video when she gave the memorial speech, you're wrong when you claim I said her memorial speech wasn't about Benghazi (and just where in the world you came up with that ridiculous assertion is beyond me), you're provably wrong when you said Clinton never said anyone should go after those responsible and you've contradicted your claim she's never promised to go after the real killers.
I know there are certain people in this world who don't give a rat's rear end about facts and the truth, so long as it promotes their political agenda. Right now, it appears you're one of those people, by making statements which unbiased evidence proves false. How about you do the honorable thing and admit you've been wrong on so many of the things you've stated?