Page 16 of 23 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 226

Thread: Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists[W:130]

  1. #151
    Sage
    Slyfox696's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:53 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    7,964

    Re: Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists

    Quote Originally Posted by jmotivator View Post
    Exactly. The best that you can take away from the Hilary quote is that she wants to figure out what went wrong so long and we don't blame her for it. She has zero tolerance for introspection which makes her absolute poison as a leader.
    Hillary has already taken blame for the incident long ago. The carelessness with which people throw about words, and the utter lack of concern about facts, always amazes me.

    Clinton Accepts Blame for Benghazi - WSJ.com

  2. #152
    The Dude
    Kobie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Western NY
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    42,861

    Re: Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists

    Quote Originally Posted by Grant View Post
    Perhaps you should start a thread about Joseph Kony and those who care can contribute.
    In other words, no rebuttal. Kony isn't a cudgel the hacks can attempt to bash Hillary with. That is the only, and I mean ONLY reason they care one rabbit turd about Boko.
    Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism.

  3. #153
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists

    Quote Originally Posted by jmotivator View Post
    Exactly. The best that you can take away from the Hilary quote is that she wants to figure out what went wrong so long and we don't blame her for it. She has zero tolerance for introspection which makes her absolute poison as a leader.
    Btw JM. Just what were those repercussions Hillary suffered from her lil tantrum?

  4. #154
    Sage
    jmotivator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    12-09-17 @ 08:50 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    16,619

    Re: Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Btw JM. Just what were those repercussions Hillary suffered from her lil tantrum?
    Well, I don't know if there have been any. Would she be Secretary of State today if Benghazi never happened? Maybe.

    She has a lot to answer for if she plans to run for president in 2016. Failures in Libya, Egypt, Syria, Russia, Iran and now Nigeria. There is nothing positive that I can think of off the top of my head that Clinton accomplished as Secretary of State... or ever, for that matter.
    Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he stops voting for the Free Fish party.

  5. #155
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Denio Junction
    Last Seen
    11-13-14 @ 12:09 AM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    7,039
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists

    Wow really hurts when someone picks on your beloved hilda doesn't it? I can't see how you view my opinion over your extreme lean as a lie? That makes no sense - so there is no apology - like I thought I never called you a liar I called out your lean as extreme left which you so clearly illustrate with each passing defense of the hildabeast. All of that of course my opinion which I'm entitled too and not about to apologize for.

    Her words, "what difference, at this piont, does it make" is does not need context since they are her words. Did Romney's 47% need context - no - and neither does hilda's. I have my opinion as to what her words met and being a person that doesn't like hilda its clear its different then yours who's in love with her, will bow to her, and kiss her feet and defend her no matter what she says or how she says it.

    BTW your "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH A HAHAHAHAHAHA " puts you into context quite clearly as one who can't take criticism very well, can't accept other points of views, and get a little bent out of shape - toughen up, get some thick skin and live on. Don't show such - what did you call it - something lacking? I don't recall because it wasn't important, relevant or valued in the discussion.

    FACT is hilda demonstrated exactly what her focus would be in a crisis - that is a weakness - everyone knows it clearly except her beloved fans. Each and every decision she makes will be solely focused on how it makes her look.


    Quote Originally Posted by Slyfox696 View Post
    I await your apology.

    Yes, but calling me a liar is still a personal attack.


    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA

    Oh my God...how in the hell do you not understand that's EXACTLY the point I'm making! Holy crap, you just made my point for me. You aren't interested in context, you don't care what she actually said, you just want to twist her words into a way your political team can use for a victory.

    Unbelievable, I never thought someone would actually admit they don't care about the context of words when they are blatantly twisting them into something they are not. That cracked me up. Thank you for proving exactly what I've been saying this whole thread.


    Seriously, you have to stop now, my side is hurting from laughing so much. The fact you are now saying that only extreme people care about putting words into the proper context shows you for exactly what you are. Only someone playing team politics or an incredibly dishonest person would take words out of context intentionally just to smear someone else because they don't agree with the letter behind their name. People who care about the truth will ALWAYS want to know the context of what is said.

    Obviously you don't care about the truth, you just want to wear the Republican cheerleading costume. At least you're willing to admit it.
    He got the truth. He just didn't get the "truth" he wanted.

    Then, much like Johnson, you only saw and heard what you wanted to hear. I watched it in real time as well, she gave direct answers to the best of her ability. You're just playing partisan games at this point.

    No, there is not. Just because you don't like the truth, you're not entitled to make up your own and call it fact.

    They answered the questions directly.

    If that were true, how come he didn't continue to press her? She didn't say anything in her last paragraph she hadn't already said, why didn't he continue to press her?

    Your answer is BS and we both know it.

    Every lie being told about what she said is offensive to anyone interested in the truth.

  6. #156
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists

    Quote Originally Posted by jmotivator View Post
    Well, I don't know if there have been any. Would she be Secretary of State today if Benghazi never happened? Maybe.

    She has a lot to answer for if she plans to run for president in 2016. Failures in Libya, Egypt, Syria, Russia, Iran and now Nigeria. There is nothing positive that I can think of off the top of my head that Clinton accomplished as Secretary of State... or ever, for that matter.
    Waitaminute JM.....are you telling me. That with her own words. That she was taking Responsibility for all the Major Security breaches.....that there have been No Repercussions for someone who screwed up massively on the job.

    Not even when she never checked back on her own people to see if they got out alive?

    Who could ever trust her that wears a Uniform or works for the Fed? She wouldn't care if they live or die or even get out of the jam. Whats up with that. Who would want that for a President? .....

  7. #157
    Sage
    Slyfox696's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:53 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    7,964

    Re: Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists

    Quote Originally Posted by CalGun View Post
    Wow really hurts when someone picks on your beloved hilda doesn't it?
    I don't know why you call her hilda, her name is Hillary. Surely you're smart enough to type an extra two letters.

    And she's not my beloved, I have no attachment at all to her. Unlike you, I just prefer facts and truth.

    I can't see how you view my opinion over your extreme lean as a lie?
    That's not what I said. I said you called me a liar, by saying that I claim to be one thing when I'm another. Thus, you are calling me a liar.

    So I still await your apology for the personal attack.

    Her words, "what difference, at this piont, does it make" is does not need context since they are her words.
    What an incredibly dishonest thing to say. Everything requires context. Taking words out of context (and your refusal to consider context says a lot about you) can completely twist the meaning of words into something they were never intended.

    Did Romney's 47% need context
    Of course they did. The problem with Romney's 47% comment was that, in context, it was incredibly offensive.

    A better example would be when Romney was quoted as saying that he's "not concerned about the very poor". Any person interested in the truth would know he was simply making the case safety nets already exist for those people, so he would focus on the middle class, a completely logical thing to say.

    I guess that means Romney is my beloved now too, right? Because I care about context when he said something?

    I have my opinion as to what her words met
    And your opinion is clearly wrong, as evidenced by the context surrounding her words. Why do you insist on such a dishonest interpretation of what she said? Are you really that absorbed into team politics you're willing to ignore facts to commit to lies?

    BTW your "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH A HAHAHAHAHAHA " puts you into context quite clearly as one who can't take criticism very well
    No, it just was representative of how hard I laughed when you admitted you weren't concerned about facts, only mindless partisan rhetoric.

    can't accept other points of views
    You don't have a point of view, you have partisan rhetoric which has been proven false to anyone interested in truth.
    toughen up, get some thick skin and live on.
    Don't intentionally misrepresent what people say and we don't have a problem. *shrugs*

    FACT is hilda demonstrated exactly what her focus would be in a crisis - that is a weakness - everyone knows it clearly except her beloved fans. Each and every decision she makes will be solely focused on how it makes her look.
    And even if it's not what she does, you'll just pretend it is anyways, because you have already admitted you will willfully remain ignorant of any actual context or truth.
    Last edited by Slyfox696; 05-13-14 at 03:12 PM.

  8. #158
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canada, Costa Rica
    Last Seen
    05-16-16 @ 09:45 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,645

    Re: Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    In other words, no rebuttal. Kony isn't a cudgel the hacks can attempt to bash Hillary with. That is the only, and I mean ONLY reason they care one rabbit turd about Boko.
    If you want to change the thread to Joseph Kony rather than Boko Haram and the kidnapped girls go ahead. What was it you wanted to say about him?

  9. #159
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canada, Costa Rica
    Last Seen
    05-16-16 @ 09:45 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,645

    Re: Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Waitaminute JM.....are you telling me. That with her own words. That she was taking Responsibility for all the Major Security breaches.....that there have been No Repercussions for someone who screwed up massively on the job.

    Not even when she never checked back on her own people to see if they got out alive?

    Who could ever trust her that wears a Uniform or works for the Fed? She wouldn't care if they live or die or even get out of the jam. Whats up with that. Who would want that for a President? .....
    Unfortunately, she slept in when the call came, as did her boss. Doesn't this ad seem ludicrous now? Hillary Clinton Ad - 3 AM White House Ringing Phone - YouTube

  10. #160
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canada, Costa Rica
    Last Seen
    05-16-16 @ 09:45 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,645

    Re: Hillary's State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists

    Quote Originally Posted by jmotivator View Post
    Well, I don't know if there have been any. Would she be Secretary of State today if Benghazi never happened? Maybe.

    She has a lot to answer for if she plans to run for president in 2016. Failures in Libya, Egypt, Syria, Russia, Iran and now Nigeria. There is nothing positive that I can think of off the top of my head that Clinton accomplished as Secretary of State... or ever, for that matter.
    There is nothing. The only thing they giver her credit for is traveling a great deal, which Bill probably encouraged anyway. There is no there there.

Page 16 of 23 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •