Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism.
She has a lot to answer for if she plans to run for president in 2016. Failures in Libya, Egypt, Syria, Russia, Iran and now Nigeria. There is nothing positive that I can think of off the top of my head that Clinton accomplished as Secretary of State... or ever, for that matter.
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he stops voting for the Free Fish party.
Wow really hurts when someone picks on your beloved hilda doesn't it? I can't see how you view my opinion over your extreme lean as a lie? That makes no sense - so there is no apology - like I thought I never called you a liar I called out your lean as extreme left which you so clearly illustrate with each passing defense of the hildabeast. All of that of course my opinion which I'm entitled too and not about to apologize for.
Her words, "what difference, at this piont, does it make" is does not need context since they are her words. Did Romney's 47% need context - no - and neither does hilda's. I have my opinion as to what her words met and being a person that doesn't like hilda its clear its different then yours who's in love with her, will bow to her, and kiss her feet and defend her no matter what she says or how she says it.
BTW your "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH A HAHAHAHAHAHA " puts you into context quite clearly as one who can't take criticism very well, can't accept other points of views, and get a little bent out of shape - toughen up, get some thick skin and live on. Don't show such - what did you call it - something lacking? I don't recall because it wasn't important, relevant or valued in the discussion.
FACT is hilda demonstrated exactly what her focus would be in a crisis - that is a weakness - everyone knows it clearly except her beloved fans. Each and every decision she makes will be solely focused on how it makes her look.
"What difference" "does it make?"
Not even when she never checked back on her own people to see if they got out alive?
Who could ever trust her that wears a Uniform or works for the Fed? She wouldn't care if they live or die or even get out of the jam. Whats up with that. Who would want that for a President? .....
And she's not my beloved, I have no attachment at all to her. Unlike you, I just prefer facts and truth.
That's not what I said. I said you called me a liar, by saying that I claim to be one thing when I'm another. Thus, you are calling me a liar.I can't see how you view my opinion over your extreme lean as a lie?
So I still await your apology for the personal attack.
What an incredibly dishonest thing to say. Everything requires context. Taking words out of context (and your refusal to consider context says a lot about you) can completely twist the meaning of words into something they were never intended.Her words, "what difference, at this piont, does it make" is does not need context since they are her words.
Of course they did. The problem with Romney's 47% comment was that, in context, it was incredibly offensive.Did Romney's 47% need context
A better example would be when Romney was quoted as saying that he's "not concerned about the very poor". Any person interested in the truth would know he was simply making the case safety nets already exist for those people, so he would focus on the middle class, a completely logical thing to say.
I guess that means Romney is my beloved now too, right? Because I care about context when he said something?
And your opinion is clearly wrong, as evidenced by the context surrounding her words. Why do you insist on such a dishonest interpretation of what she said? Are you really that absorbed into team politics you're willing to ignore facts to commit to lies?I have my opinion as to what her words met
No, it just was representative of how hard I laughed when you admitted you weren't concerned about facts, only mindless partisan rhetoric.BTW your "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH A HAHAHAHAHAHA " puts you into context quite clearly as one who can't take criticism very well
You don't have a point of view, you have partisan rhetoric which has been proven false to anyone interested in truth.can't accept other points of views
Don't intentionally misrepresent what people say and we don't have a problem. *shrugs*toughen up, get some thick skin and live on.
And even if it's not what she does, you'll just pretend it is anyways, because you have already admitted you will willfully remain ignorant of any actual context or truth.FACT is hilda demonstrated exactly what her focus would be in a crisis - that is a weakness - everyone knows it clearly except her beloved fans. Each and every decision she makes will be solely focused on how it makes her look.
Last edited by Slyfox696; 05-13-14 at 01:12 PM.