And clearly Bill knew better - with each and every one of his multiple adulterous affairs.
Yeah, I judge. I judge them both.
I question the motive of Monica for agreeing to this. Who the hell even cared about her anymore?
The only reason we are talking now is because SHE allowed this to be out there.
Who the hell cared anymore?????
Last edited by vesper; 05-08-14 at 02:36 PM.
And frankly...what defense? She had (at least) 2 affairs with married men. Unless it was rape or blackmail (then it would be a crime not a mutual lustfest)she was a more than willing participant. Her behavior was atrocious in both affairs as was the behavior of both men involved. She is just rehashing it again.
Good grief when a powerful older man takes advantage of you in your stupid youth then lies about what occurred blaming the young and dumb one for it destroying what character she had left, that is a good defense. Now her name keeps popping up again because of Hillary possibly running for president and this time she has decided to "not walk on eggshells" in regard to her past. That's got to scare the hell out of them.
And how long did people talk about Bill's book? A couple of weeks? I didn't even know he mentioned her (barely knew he wrote a book, still couldn't tell you the name). In fact, how much of the book was "devoted" to her at all? Pretty sure she is barely even mentioned in that book. From the reviews I've seen, the scandal only takes up a few pages of the 1008 page memoir.
There is no way that they are scared of her "telling all". She has maintained the whole time that it was consensual. The whole world knows the story. What exactly do you think this could possibly do to the Clintons? Everyone knows that Bill is a dog and that Hillary wasn't exactly the most loving woman. It isn't going to be as "shocking" as some may believe. It would be more of a rehash with just a little extra details.
"A woman is like a teabag, you never know how strong she is until she gets in hot water." - Eleanor Roosevelt
Keep your religion out of other people's marriages.
I am curious....can you site me sources for her name repetitively coming up in the media? Seriously, before this article has she even been on your radar in years??
By the way...who benefits from Monica coming to the forefront again? Dems? Republicans? Monica? Bill? Fox?
Why do I get the feeling that if the CEO of Exxon Mobil was caught having an affair with a 22 year old intern in his company, the ones criticizing Lewinsky in this thread would be the same ones calling for the Exxon CEO to be burned at the stake, calling him a user and abuser of young girls, a pervert, a monster, and so on, and defending the honor of the young lady in question....?