• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist Group

Grim17

Grim17

Battle Ready
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
34,478
Reaction score
17,282
Location
Southwestern U.S.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
This seals the deal... The Obama Administration was definitely involved in a cover-up.


Internal Emails: State Dept. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist Group
by Sharyl Attkisson, May 1, 2014

A newly-released government email indicates that within hours of the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks on Americans in Benghazi, Libya; the State Department had already concluded with certainty that the Islamic militia terrorist group Ansar al Sharia was to blame.

The private, internal communication directly contradicts the message that President Obama,
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice and White House
press secretary Jay Carney repeated publicly over the course of the next several weeks.
They often maintained that an anti-Islamic YouTube video inspired a spontaneous
demonstration that escalated into violence.

The email is entitled “Libya update from Beth Jones. ” Jones was then-Assistant Secretary
of State to Hillary Clinton. According to the email, Jones spoke to Libya’s Ambassador at
9:45am on Sept. 12, 2012 following the attacks.
Click to expand...

State Dept. Al Sharia Email, May 1, 2014

Email: State Dept Official Close to Hillary Informed Benghazi Was Terrorist Attack | Mediaite


[h=1][/h]
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

Grim17 said:
This seals the deal... The Obama Administration was definitely involved in a cover-up.




State Dept. Al Sharia Email, May 1, 2014

Email: State Dept Official Close to Hillary Informed Benghazi Was Terrorist Attack | Mediaite


[h=1][/h]
Click to expand...

The solution was to get someone "friendly" that could not be proven to have been factually addressed/briefed before, like Susan Rice, and supply them with talking points validating the "UBL is dead, GM is alive and Al Qaeda is on the run" campaign message. Later you claim that all sorts of folks had a hand in the editing deal but that neither Obama nor Clinton can be proven to have directly influenced what Rice said. ;)
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

ttwtt78640 said:
The solution was to get someone "friendly" that could not be proven to have been factually addressed/briefed before, like Susan Rice, and supply them with talking points validating the "UBL is dead, GM is alive and Al Qaeda is on the run" campaign message. Later you claim that all sorts of folks had a hand in the editing deal but that neither Obama nor Clinton can be proven to have directly influenced what Rice said. ;)
Click to expand...
When there is an investigation going on, is the U.S. government required to tell public exactly what they know and do not know?????
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

ttwtt78640 said:
The solution was to get someone "friendly" that could not be proven to have been factually addressed/briefed before, like Susan Rice, and supply them with talking points validating the "UBL is dead, GM is alive and Al Qaeda is on the run" campaign message. Later you claim that all sorts of folks had a hand in the editing deal but that neither Obama nor Clinton can be proven to have directly influenced what Rice said. ;)
Click to expand...

This thing has now blown up and there is absolutely no doubt that the Administration was involved in a cover-up... What is so very, very sad is the fact the left will still refuse to acknowledge this and do everything they can to dismiss this.
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

pbrauer said:
When there is an investigation going on, is the U.S. government required to tell public exactly what they know and do not know?????
Click to expand...

Of course not, this is the most transparent US administration in history. ;)

They tell the public exactly what they want them to hear and then claim confusion in the fog of a spontaneous protest to an offensive video clip in the midst of a man caused disaster.
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

Grim17 said:
This thing has now blown up and there is absolutely no doubt that the Administration was involved in a cover-up... What is so very, very sad is the fact the left will still refuse to acknowledge this and do everything they can to dismiss this.
Click to expand...

We all know that but, what difference, at this point, does it make?
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

ttwtt78640 said:
Of course not, this is the most transparent US administration in history. ;)

They tell the public exactly what they want them to hear and then claim confusion in the fog of a spontaneous protest to an offensive video clip in the midst of a man caused disaster.
Click to expand...
Do you realize this is the story CIA Director David Petraeus when he first testified before the house? He later changed his story.
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

Grim17 said:
This thing has now blown up and there is absolutely no doubt that the Administration was involved in a cover-up... What is so very, very sad is the fact the left will still refuse to acknowledge this and do everything they can to dismiss this.
Click to expand...
I realize Fox has you convinced of this crap, I WANT YOU TO PROVE THE ALLEGATION THIS IS A COVER-UP.
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

Grim17 said:
This thing has now blown up and there is absolutely no doubt that the Administration was involved in a cover-up... What is so very, very sad is the fact the left will still refuse to acknowledge this and do everything they can to dismiss this.
Click to expand...

The left does not want any questions asked.

Like the toadies who supported the slime Richard Nixon in Watergate, sneering at anyone who is curious or, perhaps, wants what Obama promised: "the most open and transparent administration in history."

Instead they insist, again and again, to a nauseating level, that Obama cannot ever do a wrong, make an error, or be self preserving in anyway, that evil, conspiring Republicans are plotting and scheming because they are racist.

I know this, when I accused my kids of anything, they were quick to defend themselves and where it was so, convincingly. I know that if ever there was something missing in the workplace, those not involved where the first to show offer to show it.

I know that the guilty want to avoid an investigation and I know that people who love their country more than a rock star want the very best treatment for those who serve their country, that no one should die where it could have been presented.

Congress not only needs to press this harder, but open a side investigation into a possible cover-up, the evidence is there, Jayt Carney has made enough deliberately misleading statements to the public there is grounds.

What annoys me most, is that the left was always so eager to run this clip...


...but now hide from it.

Pretty clear why.
that clip o
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

ttwtt78640 said:
We all know that but, what difference, at this point, does it make?
Click to expand...
What Hillary said was very true when quoted in the proper context, but it's become a talking point for the RWNJ.
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

ttwtt78640 said:
We all know that but, what difference, at this point, does it make?
Click to expand...

It makes plenty of difference. If this is the kind of behavior that people condone from our leaders, than it means nothing... but if this kind of lying by our leaders is something that people believe is wrong, then it must be investigated, fully exposed, condemned, action must be taken and heads need to roll... otherwise, it will be the equivalent of giving our silent approval for this kind of behavior, and we can then fully expect it to become the norm from every president that follows Obama..
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

Grim17 said:
It makes plenty of difference. If this is the kind of behavior that people condone from our leaders, than it means nothing... but if this kind of lying by our leaders is something that people believe is wrong, then it must be investigated, fully exposed, condemned, action must be taken and heads need to roll... otherwise, it will be the equivalent of giving our silent approval for this kind of behavior, and we can then fully expect it to become the norm from every president that follows Obama..
Click to expand...
Do you even know Hillary's full quote to Senator Johnson? Bet you don't.
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

Grim17 said:
It makes plenty of difference. If this is the kind of behavior that people condone from our leaders, than it means nothing... but if this kind of lying by our leaders is something that people believe is wrong, then it must be investigated, fully exposed, condemned, action must be taken and heads need to roll... otherwise, it will be the equivalent of giving our silent approval for this kind of behavior, and we can then fully expect it to become the norm from every president that follows Obama..
Click to expand...

This whole "process" is a joke. We have professional liars judging the severity of lies told by other professional liars, often years after the fact. Since we have "gotten to the bottom of" Fast & Fuzzy, Solyndra, you can keep your crappy plan/doctor, selective immigration law enforcement and the IRS "special" 501(c)(4) provisions we can clearly expect swift and sure "just us" be meted out over the Benghazi "interpretation" conveyed to the public.
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

ttwtt78640 said:
This whole "process" is a joke. We have professional liars judging the severity of lies told by other professional liars, often years after the fact. Since we have "gotten to the bottom of" Fast & Fuzzy, Solyndra, you can keep your crappy plan/doctor, selective immigration law enforcement and the IRS "special" 501(c)(4) provisions we can clearly expect swift and sure "just us" be meted out over the Benghazi "interpretation" conveyed to the public.
Click to expand...

I share in your frustration, but the truth be told, the reason none of those scandals has gotten the attention needed, is the fault of the main stream liberal media.

The one thing that is absolutely necessary for a scandal to be fully investigated is the publics demand for it... The only way the public demands an investigation is when they are fully informed of the severity of the scandal, and that falls right into the laps of ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and Fox. When cable news networks are the only ones reporting on these issues, they go nowhere and the public dismisses them just like the liberal media does. ABC, NBC and CBS have for all practical purposes swept every one of these issues under the rug, therefore so has the American public.

If anyone doubts the power of the main stream media, I have a video that demonstrates this that I would be more than happy to share with you.
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

It should be her slogan for her desired incarnation! She used the words. It's like using the 47% statement except she wasn't secretly recorded it was congressional testimony. Play with those words all YOU want she is going to choke on em!

pbrauer said:
What Hillary said was very true when quoted in the proper context, but it's become a talking point for the RWNJ.
Click to expand...
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

Grim17 said:
I share in your frustration, but the truth be told, the reason none of those scandals has gotten the attention needed, is the fault of the main stream liberal media.

The one thing that is absolutely necessary for a scandal to be fully investigated is the publics demand for it... The only way the public demands an investigation is when they are fully informed of the severity of the scandal, and that falls right into the laps of ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and Fox. When cable news networks are the only ones reporting on these issues, they go nowhere and the public dismisses them just like the liberal media does. ABC, NBC and CBS have for all practical purposes swept every one of these issues under the rug, therefore so has the American public.

If anyone doubts the power of the main stream media, I have a video that demonstrates this that I would be more than happy to share with you.
Click to expand...

The problem, IMHO, is that we the people lack "standing" to do a damn thing about it. These clowns simply dare us to vote them out of office and yet we abide by their inaction 92% of the time. So long as they make noise (promise stuff) we let them slide.
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

Trust in government is at an all time low, transparency is a joke just like the regime in charge. I can only hope the 47% will find it more important to have honesty then a socialist hand out.


ttwtt78640 said:
This whole "process" is a joke. We have professional liars judging the severity of lies told by other professional liars, often years after the fact. Since we have "gotten to the bottom of" Fast & Fuzzy, Solyndra, you can keep your crappy plan/doctor, selective immigration law enforcement and the IRS "special" 501(c)(4) provisions we can clearly expect swift and sure "just us" be meted out over the Benghazi "interpretation" conveyed to the public.
Click to expand...
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

CalGun said:
It should be her slogan for her desired incarnation! She used the words. It's like using the 47% statement except she wasn't secretly recorded it was congressional testimony. Play with those words all YOU want she is going to choke on em!
Click to expand...

LMMFAO, here is what she said:


Johnson: No, again, we were misled that there were supposedly protests and that something sprang out of that -- an assault sprang out of that -- and that was easily ascertained that that was not the fact, and the American people could have known that within days and they didn’t know that.

Clinton: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The IC has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we’ll figure out what was going on in the meantime.

Johnson: OK. Thank you, Madame Secretary.

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/article/2013/may/07/context-hillary-clintons-what-difference-does-it-m/
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

CalGun said:
Trust in government is at an all time low, transparency is a joke just like the regime in charge. I can only hope the 47% will find it more important to have honesty then a socialist hand out.
Click to expand...

Slim chance of that. The 47% that pay no federal income tax coupled with those that are in, or work directly for, the huge nanny state are a majority of the voters.
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

Grim17 said:
I share in your frustration, but the truth be told, the reason none of those scandals has gotten the attention needed, is the fault of the main stream liberal media.

The one thing that is absolutely necessary for a scandal to be fully investigated is the publics demand for it... The only way the public demands an investigation is when they are fully informed of the severity of the scandal, and that falls right into the laps of ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and Fox. When cable news networks are the only ones reporting on these issues, they go nowhere and the public dismisses them just like the liberal media does. ABC, NBC and CBS have for all practical purposes swept every one of these issues under the rug, therefore so has the American public.

If anyone doubts the power of the main stream media, I have a video that demonstrates this that I would be more than happy to share with you.
Click to expand...

I'd like to see that video.

I thought that this was rather interesting.

BeghaziRhodesBro_v3.jpg


Gee whiz. Why is THIS not surprising?
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

If you look at the residence DNC parolee above defending Hilda's comment you might find a growing number of the 47% becoming disenchanted with the lies and failures of this regime. He some how thinks "what difference" "does it make" doesn't really matter even when 4 citizens are dead.


ttwtt78640 said:
Slim chance of that. The 47% that pay no federal income tax coupled with those that are in, or work directly for, the huge nanny state are a majority of the voters.
Click to expand...
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

eohrnberger said:
I'd like to see that video.
Click to expand...

This goes back to the 2008 election... The parts that back up what I'm saying start at around the 2:45 mark:



Then of course there is the Zogby poll that backs up the video which found:

Results to 12 simple Multiple Choice Questions

57.4% could NOT correctly say which party controls congress (50/50 shot just by guessing)

71.8% could NOT correctly say Joe Biden quit a previous campaign because of plagiarism (25% chance by guessing)

82.6% could NOT correctly say that Barack Obama won his first election by getting opponents kicked off the ballot (25% chance by guessing)

88.4% could NOT correctly say that Obama said his policies would likely bankrupt the coal industry and make energy rates skyrocket (25% chance by guessing)

56.1% could NOT correctly say Obama started his political career at the home of two former members of the Weather Underground (25% chance by guessing).

And yet.....

Only 13.7% failed to identify Sarah Palin as the person on which their party spent $150,000 in clothes

Only 6.2% failed to identify Palin as the one with a pregnant teenage daughter

And 86.9 % thought that Palin said that she could see Russia from her "house," even though that was Tina Fey who said that!!

Only 2.4% got at least 11 correct.

Only .5% got all of them correct. (And we "gave" one answer that was technically not Palin, but actually Tina Fey)​


Media Malpractice Zogby Poll Results
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

Grim17 said:
This goes back to the 2008 election... The parts that back up what I'm saying start at around the 2:45 mark:



Then of course there is the Zogby poll that backs up the video which found:

Results to 12 simple Multiple Choice Questions

57.4% could NOT correctly say which party controls congress (50/50 shot just by guessing)

71.8% could NOT correctly say Joe Biden quit a previous campaign because of plagiarism (25% chance by guessing)

82.6% could NOT correctly say that Barack Obama won his first election by getting opponents kicked off the ballot (25% chance by guessing)

88.4% could NOT correctly say that Obama said his policies would likely bankrupt the coal industry and make energy rates skyrocket (25% chance by guessing)

56.1% could NOT correctly say Obama started his political career at the home of two former members of the Weather Underground (25% chance by guessing).

And yet.....

Only 13.7% failed to identify Sarah Palin as the person on which their party spent $150,000 in clothes

Only 6.2% failed to identify Palin as the one with a pregnant teenage daughter

And 86.9 % thought that Palin said that she could see Russia from her "house," even though that was Tina Fey who said that!!

Only 2.4% got at least 11 correct.

Only .5% got all of them correct. (And we "gave" one answer that was technically not Palin, but actually Tina Fey)​


Media Malpractice Zogby Poll Results
Click to expand...

That has to be one of the stupidest things I've seen in a long time. Do you realize about 25% don't know from which country we got our independence from? God you people are gullible.
 
Re: Internal Emails: State Dp. Immediately Attributed Benghazi Attacks to Terrorist G

Grim17 said:
This goes back to the 2008 election... The parts that back up what I'm saying start at around the 2:45 mark:



Then of course there is the Zogby poll that backs up the video which found:

Results to 12 simple Multiple Choice Questions

57.4% could NOT correctly say which party controls congress (50/50 shot just by guessing)

71.8% could NOT correctly say Joe Biden quit a previous campaign because of plagiarism (25% chance by guessing)

82.6% could NOT correctly say that Barack Obama won his first election by getting opponents kicked off the ballot (25% chance by guessing)

88.4% could NOT correctly say that Obama said his policies would likely bankrupt the coal industry and make energy rates skyrocket (25% chance by guessing)

56.1% could NOT correctly say Obama started his political career at the home of two former members of the Weather Underground (25% chance by guessing).

And yet.....

Only 13.7% failed to identify Sarah Palin as the person on which their party spent $150,000 in clothes

Only 6.2% failed to identify Palin as the one with a pregnant teenage daughter

And 86.9 % thought that Palin said that she could see Russia from her "house," even though that was Tina Fey who said that!!

Only 2.4% got at least 11 correct.

Only .5% got all of them correct. (And we "gave" one answer that was technically not Palin, but actually Tina Fey)​


Media Malpractice Zogby Poll Results
Click to expand...


So, I suppose one could reasonably conclude that the Obama presidency was Biased Lame Stream Media's (BLSM) greatest gift to the electorate?

I mean just look. Every possibly bad aspect from the opposition was well known by the interviewed, where as hardly any possibly bad aspect of the left was not known, but even less known was anything about Obama himself. Yeah, media malpractice, I'd have to agree.

pbrauer said:
That has to be one of the stupidest things I've seen in a long time. Do you realize about 25% don't know from which country we got our independence from? God you people are gullible.
Click to expand...

Umm, those would be the low information Obama voters / supporters. 'Come on Pete. This is hardly a surprise to anyone, including you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom