Wtf? Land is land. Water is water. He shouldnt be allowed to restrict the water but the parameters shoudl be the same regardless. Even if the river is right on the middle point.
Is society was made of coral our world would be floral.
I never said taking 140 acres was justified, only that the original OP article is complete crap and misrepresents the story entirely. The article should have plainly stated they are attempting to steal 140 acres from this guy through a natural process that short changes the rancher because of the rules or misapplication of the rules.
If they "never owned it" then they should get a full refund for all taxes paid. At the least.
Won't happen, of course, but it should.
If, when defending your support for Donald Trump, and your response is,
"But but but... HILLARY!!!", then you lost the argument before you even began.
Fiddling While Rome Burns
Carthago Delenda Est
"I used to roll the dice; see the fear in my enemies' eyes... listen as the crowd would sing, 'now the old king is dead, Long Live the King.'.."
I'll let you 1/4 acre suburban types in on a little something... this crap goes on all the time, that it is now the focus of the hair on fire crowd is laughable.
If you had a clue just how crappy the border is defined along the Red River you damn sure wouldn't build a home there...
Unless the feds are claiming a valid public interest, in which case eminent domain applies, the feds have no valid reason to harass this rancher, or steal his land.
Last edited by jimbo; 04-19-14 at 07:02 PM.