• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would Stay C

Re: WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would St

The arrogance of your statement is astounding.

... America's wealthiest individuals and top financial institutions have trillions in under utilized wealth parked overseas in foreign accounting firms. Trillions that would be much more efficiently utilized by middle class consumers. I feel comfortable with the statement.

I see, so directed wealth transfer is what you want? Is that what you are saying?

Wealth redistribution has its uses, but its efficacy for this type of thing is somewhat limited. In this case, tasking corporations with mandatory wage increases and job creation quotas would be a more effective solution. The former exists as the 'minimum wage' while the latter has never been seriously attempted outside the municipal level. Another (although less desirable) option would be socialize key segments of industry (the European solution).

Increasing wages for anyone below the executive rank is accompanied by all sorts of complications that corporations prefer to avoid, with the result being that pay raises can lag for decades. However, just as grinding your teeth (a harmless action in its own right) causes stress which, over long periods of time can cause considerable damage to your teeth, withholding wealth from the economy also cause complications over long periods of time. Over reliance on debt (public and private), lack of equity, etc.

The basic problem is that after meeting all of their fiscal goals for the quarter (wages delivered, shareholders paid off, distribution expenses taken care of, businesses operations expanded to new territories, etc), corporations prefer to wait for signs of life before choosing to do anything else with the money that is left. This is particularly the case if they are looking at a market whose growth has capped or if it is an aspect of business with which they are unfamiliar. As such, the safest fiscal option is to set excess fiscal profits in a foreign accounting firm where it won't be taxed.

The result is that nothing gets done, nothing gets made, and people turn to welfare to make ends meet.
 
Last edited:
Re: WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would St

Read more: WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would Stay Cheap - Business Insider

Whose says we arent ran by corporations? This is more proof that corporations dominate our politics not only at home but overseas. Welcome to America [/FONT][/COLOR]
minyg2.jpg

That's why Libertarianism is important. In a Libertarian US, tax dollars couldn't be used by corporations to influence foreign govts. to change their laws.
 
Re: WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would St

Without jobs, there is no economic growth.

Economic growth in the US is also stifled by the IRS, which collects taxes to help corporations lobby other govts. to make laws suitable for them.
 
Re: WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would St

That's why Libertarianism is important. In a Libertarian US, tax dollars couldn't be used by corporations to influence foreign govts. to change their laws.

they would just literally run the country barbecue there will be no regulations against them.
 
Re: WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would St

they would just literally run the country barbecue there will be no regulations against them.

Liability laws would still be in place, and unlike now, actually enforced by residents w/tanks and automatic rifles.
 
Re: WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would St

Liability laws would still be in place, and unlike now, actually enforced by residents w/tanks and automatic rifles.

Residents with tanks and guns? Gonna prop up militias everywhere? Gonna get enough apathetic Americans to actually care about what goes beyond their reality TV shows and NFL games?
 
Re: WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would St

Residents with tanks and guns? Gonna prop up militias everywhere? Gonna get enough apathetic Americans to actually care about what goes beyond their reality TV shows and NFL games?

Some business will offer them a deal: for every oil polluting CEO they kill, they get a free keg, and 2000 hrs. of free cable, including the sports channel.

The killing or the deal wouldn't be illegal since it would be enforcement of the liability law.
 
Re: WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would St

Some business will offer them a deal: for every oil polluting CEO they kill, they get a free keg, and 2000 hrs. of free cable, including the sports channel.

The killing or the deal wouldn't be illegal since it would be enforcement of the liability law.

So the people are generally gonna stop monopolies? Why didnt that work out so well during the industrial revolution?
 
Re: WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would St

So the people are generally gonna stop monopolies? Why didnt that work out so well during the industrial revolution?

Because the Industrial Revolution occurred in a non-Libertarian environment, where the federal govt. acted as an enabler in favor of the large industries of the day (i. e. railroads, oil) instead of a neutral mediator. . .

High protective tariffs were enacted to shield American business from foreign competition.
.
.
.
Millions of dollars and acres of land were granted to corporations. . .

http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/teachers/lesson_plans/pdfs/unit7_1.pdf

In a pure free market, there are no tariffs and no granting (giving away) of land by the govt. Land has to be bought from private individuals who own it.

Historically, the Natives were the rightful owners of that land, yet it was stolen from them by invaders and then subsequently given away by the govt. to people like Rockefeller, Carnegie, etc. FYI, theft <> free market.
 
Re: WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would St

Because the Industrial Revolution occurred in a non-Libertarian environment, where the federal govt. acted as an enabler in favor of the large industries of the day (i. e. railroads, oil) instead of a neutral mediator. . .
And so in a libertarian environment thats gonna stop it how? Wouldnt it just lead to more monopolies? Hell it was the people who rose up and called for the state to stop these practices (monopolies)...

In a pure free market, there are no tariffs and no granting (giving away) of land by the govt. Land has to be bought from private individuals who own it.
Which will lead to powerful corporations conglomerating more and more creating monopolies..
 
Re: WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would St

I've been to Haiti. Minimum wage means nothing especially when jobs are limited. They lack a police force and court system to adequately enforce those kinds of laws anyway. The Haitian government is also very corrupt and can be bought off by pretty much anyone with the money to do so.

When I was there we saw a public housing construction site donated for by the UN (I think). The guy said they got plenty of money to build it, but with the money they got they only erected steel beams and didn't get into any of the other work. The government blew it on other stuff and was demanding more money to finish the project. Haiti is lawless with a self serving government. It's quite a sad state of affairs.
 
Re: WIKILEAKS: U.S. Fought To Lower Minimum Wage In Haiti So Hanes And Levis Would St

And so in a libertarian environment thats gonna stop it how?

Because there are no enablers. Monopolies have trouble forming in a neutral free market when the playing field is purely level.

PROOF: all known monopolies/oligopolies in existence can be traced to at least one historical instance involving large-scale theft (not acquisition) of capital, such as land, or at least one large-scale, coercive shielding of competition (i. e. tariffs).

Wouldnt it just lead to more monopolies? Hell it was the people who rose up and called for the state to stop these practices (monopolies)...

The state (as cited) was responsible for creating those monopolies. With zero tariffs and zero land granting (from the theft of land from Natives), there would've been no Standard Oil, no Carnegie Steel.

It's unlikely that Rockefeller would've built a monopoly if he had to pay rent to the Natives for drilling on their land.

The modern notion that govt. is integral to acting as a check on monopolies and its abuses is based on an erroneous view of capitalism, one in which there exists a pure free market within a private sector on one side and a govt. separate from that private sector that's accountable solely to the mass consumer base.

The system that exists today and that existed in the Gilded Age is nothing like that. Rather, it's a perverse farce where large industries lobby the govt. to grant them special favors that shield them from natural market forces in a global economy. Today, such shielding is called corporate welfare, and it proves that the separation between the govt. and the private sector is a myth.

In effect, the reckless enabling on the part of the US govt. creates the conditions that require it to step into the market; in reality, the govt. never actually steps in to the point of making any difference, since it's ultimate allegiance is to its corporate sponsors. At best, all the govt. does is do its best to creating the illusion that it's needed (i. e. by claiming that it acts as a check on an otherwise unregulated market) in order to justify its continued existence, which is to merely to serve on behalf of the aforementioned corporations.
 
Back
Top Bottom