• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164, 712]

Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Oh let me guess.

Muhammed believes he's "pro-science," because he's not like those 99.8% of all scientists that believes climate change is occurring.

Riiiight.
Climate change is always occurring.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]


hehehehehe
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

hehehehehe
Cough, cough and a silly video.

I take that as a concession from all 3 of you. Your concessions is respectfully accepted.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Cough, cough and a silly video.

I take that as a concession from all 3 of you. Your concessions is respectfully accepted.

You can take that any way you'd like, just like you took the Nye debate however you'd like. However, I hate to burst your bubble, Nye isn't a child molester. And, if you evidence to the contrary and are withholding said evidence, congratulations you are probably guilty of negligent endangerment of a child. You sure you don't want to retract your claim?
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

You can take that any way you'd like, just like you took the Nye debate however you'd like. However, I hate to burst your bubble, Nye isn't a child molester.
Could you explain the reasoning you used to come to that conclusion?
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Could you explain the reasoning you used to come to that conclusion?

Complete and utter lack of any evidence whatsoever that he might be a child molester. This is America, if you want a guilty-until-proven-innocent witch hunt, move somewhere else.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Complete and utter lack of any evidence whatsoever that he might be a child molester. This is America, if you want a guilty-until-proven-innocent witch hunt, move somewhere else.
I never advocated a witch hunt in the first place. I merely pointed out that he fits the profile.

Also, lack of evidence is not evidence. So your reasoning doesn't make rational sense.
 
Last edited:
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Has Muhammed called atheism a religion yet?
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Has Muhammed called atheism a religion yet?
Actually I am an atheist who thinks religious beliefs are absurd.

You fail.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

I never advocated a witch hunt in the first place. I merely pointed out that he fits the profile.

Also, lack of evidence is not evidence. So your reasoning doesn't make rational sense.

Can you link to the profile?
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Just a public service reminder:

uhynyva3.jpg
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Yes. Look it up.

You are the genius or at least you claim. It shouldn't take you that long to link them and or have them in your reference material at hand
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Could you explain the reasoning you used to come to that conclusion?

The fact that he hasn't molested children to the best of my (or the public's) knowledge. And that you have asserted he is yet shown no evidence.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

The literalist version of the creation story you keep referring to, which is not the one I posted, is also false. it's not even a fable, it's false.

You post a pic about the sun being made on the 4th day, but the bible never says the sun was created on the 4th day. It says "let there be", not "God created".

The bible never says the earth is flat, either. Things like "the four corners of the world" are figures of speech we still use today. Referring to Earth's foundation....the Earth has a foundation, it's a solid iron core spinning fast generating a magnetic field. Saying man can't move the Earth from it's foundation is true, we can't remove the core nor can we change Earth's orbit around the sun.

The "Old Testament" describes the Earth as a circle, which is two-dimensional i.e. flat. It also describes a tree which could be seen from any point on Earth and a mountain top from which the entire surface of the Earth can be viewed etc. In no way can any of this be interpreted to mean anything other than a flat Earth. I think the ancient Hebrews knew what was meant to be said since they wrote it and even they believed the Earth to be a flat disk. If you're only relying on the Bible, that is the only conclusion that can be reached based on what it contains. There just isn't any way around it.

Now, lets take a brief stroll through history. Sometime around the year 600 B.C.E., Pythagoras suggested a three-dimensional/spherical model for the Earth. It was regarded as a scientific and mathematical fact by the Greeks and most other civilizations in the region within 300 years. It does not make sense that the flat Earth view experienced a resurgence, even among educated people, hundreds of years after the preponderance of the civilized world had accepted the Greek model unless the spread of Christianity and the biblical literalism it brought with it is taken into account. It was Biblical literalism which reintroduced the flat Earth view as a valid belief and, yes, many of its proponents were educated people with important roles in the early Christian Church and positions of influence in the courts of converted monarchs and emperors.

Over the next few centuries, the flat-Earth model gradually faded away again and was only espoused by an almost invisible biblical literalist minority. Its now the late 6th/early 7th century C.E. Enter Isidore of Seville. The biblical literalists just would not let the two-dimensional Earth model die and, when a man regarded by some of his contemporaries as one of the sharpest minds of the age says he thinks the Earth is a two-dimensional wheel, BAM: 1,200 years of established scientific fact goes flying out the window again and we get Earth-wheel maps floating around for the next 700 years. Its fine if some religious people, such as yourself, want to spend another 1,900 years trying to reconcile the empirical realities of the world and universe we live in with your beliefs, but don't make the rest of us come along for the ride or try to muddy the waters with pseudoscience and arbitrary reinterpretation of biblical text along the way.
 
Last edited:
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

The "Old Testament" describes the Earth as a circle, which is two-dimensional i.e. flat. It also describes a tree which could be seen from any point on Earth and a mountain top from which the entire surface of the Earth can be viewed etc. In no way can any of this be interpreted to mean anything other than a flat Earth. I think the ancient Hebrews knew what was meant to be said since they wrote it and even they believed the Earth to be a flat disk. If you're only relying on the Bible, that is the only conclusion that can be reached based on what it contains. There just isn't any way around it.
Your translation is ridiculous.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Yes. Look it up.
There isn't any profile. It is just Muhammed telling us that he doesn't like Bill Nye and can't come up with any solid reason to. So he makes up something he feels would be horrible and applies it to Mr. Nye.
No evidence, no profile, no content, just a silly guy who doesn't like another guy and makes up **** in a transparent, ineffectual attempt to discredit him.
BTW Muhammed anyone can score high on those online IQ tests if you take them enough times to look up and memorize the answers. You obviously haven't impressed anyone here with your unproven, full of yourself, claims of intellectual prowess and my bet is that you are not likely to start now.
Give it up, your unsubstantiated egotistical claims and tired trolling tactics are as old and about as useful as last weeks used coffee grounds.
If you have nothing more than an unexplained dislike for Bill Nye then perhaps you should keep it to yourself.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

The fact that he hasn't molested children to the best of my (or the public's) knowledge. And that you have asserted he is yet shown no evidence.
Your reasoning is fallacious. It is solely based on a logical fallacy. Argumentum ad ignorantiam to be specific.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

There isn't any profile. It is just Muhammed telling us that he doesn't like Bill Nye and can't come up with any solid reason to.
I gave you a solid reason. I am very pro-science and Bill Nye actively promotes junk science. He also disseminates his disinformation to young victims because he knows that all reasonable rational adults know he's full of ****. I find that to be particularly disgusting.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Your reasoning is fallacious. It is solely based on a logical fallacy. Argumentum ad ignorantiam to be specific.

Oh is it? And the ad hom you presented labeling someone a child molester without any proper evidence or trial is not a fallacy? Get that trash out of here.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

I gave you a solid reason. I am very pro-science and Bill Nye actively promotes junk science. He also disseminates his disinformation to young victims because he knows that all reasonable rational adults know he's full of ****. I find that to be particularly disgusting.

You? Pro-science? Please. You just called someone you've never met a child molester. You have presented no evidence to support your claim. Where are your publications? Where did you do your undergraduate, graduate and postdoctoral work?
 
Last edited:
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]


Here is all we need to know about this:
I should make it clear that I’m not doubting that CO2 has a positive radiative heating effect in our atmosphere, due to LWIR re-radiation, that is well established by science.
The supposed debunker has admitted in this disclaimer that the scientific principal is neither proven nor dis-proven by this non-scientific demonstration.
The science has been well established and the personal attack on Mr Gore does nothing to disprove the science .
All it has shown is that a video production studio is not a science lab.
Bill Nye lent his 'voice over"narration to the video demonstration of what is understood by the scientific community and the person who refuted the demonstration, who only identifies himself as " Anthony", all agree that it is well established scientific fact.
The science behind the demonstration was not dis-proved.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

I gave you a solid reason. I am very pro-science and Bill Nye actively promotes junk science. He also disseminates his disinformation to young victims because he knows that all reasonable rational adults know he's full of ****. I find that to be particularly disgusting.

Oh you poor thing. Bill Nye argued against your young earth creation model and that upset you to the point to call him a child molester.

As a matter of fact, the large majority of adults in this thread highly respect him. You seem to be the only one truly butthurt. I mean how dare he teach kids about this non-sense thing called science! If only we could all be as enlightened as "Muhammed", who doesn't believe in science at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom