I found this online. I'm not an astrophysicist but this might answer some questions to those requiring to metaphorically see "the nail-prints."
In the Beginning - Finding Parity Between the Bible and Science in Creation p1/2 - YouTube
Having opinions all over the map is a good sign of a person capable of autonomous thinking. Felix -2011
You must embrace clear thinking based on evidence and not dogma to win a debate.
Looking at the motivations of the person bringing the facts first is silly. Either you will follow a particular track because a authoritative person has brought the information or you will dismiss it out of hand and may well be ignoring the truth of a situation.
You should be skeptical of all the claims. You should be reasonable skeptical of the data and expect any conclusions to stand up to rigorous challenge. If either of these fail then treat such information as speculation at best. It's probably a good idea to look at the motivation of the source at such a point.