• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164, 712]

Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Your reasoning is fallacious. It is solely based on a logical fallacy. Argumentum ad ignorantiam to be specific.
No. Your only defense here is to project your own method of non-reasoning onto those who reveal you.
Argument from ignorance is exactly the specific method of indictment you employ against Mr Nye.
Your gonna have to do a lot better than that Mr self proclaimed Genius.
 
Last edited:
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

No. Your only defense here is to project your own method of non-reasoning onto those who reveal you.
Argument from ignorance is exactly the specific method of indictment you employ against Mr Nye.
Your gonna have to do a lot better than that Mr self proclaimed Genius.

Did I really read that right earlier? He was so horrible at presenting his case that he had to start inventing **** about how he has an extraordinarily high IQ and that's why we should all believe him?

Sounds legit.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Oh is it? And the ad hom you presented labeling someone a child molester without any proper evidence or trial is not a fallacy? Get that trash out of here.
What you can't seem to understand is that I never used my suspicion as an argument against his anti-science nonsense. I merely provided evidence of him faking an experiment.

Reading comprehension. Maybe you could take a special class or something.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Did I really read that right earlier? He was so horrible at presenting his case that he had to start inventing **** about how he has an extraordinarily high IQ and that's why we should all believe him?

Sounds legit.
I provided you a link to the test results. Why don't you go ahead and take the test?
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

I provided you a link to the test results. Why don't you go ahead and take the test?

Bahahahahahahahahaha. You're getting bitch slapped by an entire thread, so you start challenging people to an online IQ test. How ridiculously pathetic is that.


03.png
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Argument from ignorance is exactly the specific method of indictment you employ against Mr Nye.
That is a lie. Why are you lying to the forum?
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Bahahahahahahahahaha. You're getting bitch slapped by an entire thread, so you start challenging people to an online IQ test. How ridiculously pathetic is that.
Your concession is respectfully accepted.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Your concession is respectfully accepted.

No, I just took it, and I scored a 275, so I guess I win and that's why all my arguments are right. That really is soooo much easier than actually having to prove a point.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

No, I just took it, and I scored a 275, so I guess I win and that's why all my arguments are right. That really is soooo much easier than actually having to prove a point.
Bull****. You are lying.

Why do you seem like you worship Bill Nye the clown? How old are you?
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Bull****. You are lying.

Now you know how we feel. If dozens of people are calling you an idiot and crushing you in a debate, challenging them in an online IQ test just makes you look even more pathetic.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Now you know how we feel. If dozens of people are calling you an idiot and crushing you in a debate, challenging them in an online IQ test just makes you look even more pathetic.
Ad hominem.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Ad hominem.

Keep it up. It's rebuttals like these that have made it so easy for us to crush you. You don't even try to provide any facts or evidence for your case, you just do stupid **** like challenge people to IQ tests, and when someone calls you out on your trolling you respond with lazy garbage like this.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Oh you poor thing. Bill Nye argued against your young earth creation model
Bull****. I never advocated a "young earth creation model" in the first place. Why are you lying to the forum again? Tell the forum which post of mine advocated a "young earth creation" model. Of course you can't do that because you are simply lying.

It seems like all of your posts directed at me are either demonstrable lies or logical fallacies. WTF dude?
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Keep it up. It's rebuttals like these that have made it so easy for us to crush you.
Merely pointing out the logical fallacies you keep spewing. Why do you use them so often?
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Bull****. I never advocated a "young earth creation model" in the first place. Why are you lying to the forum again? Tell the forum which post of mine advocated a "young earth creation" model. Of course you can't do that because you are simply lying.

It seems like all of your posts directed at me are either demonstrable lies or logical fallacies. WTF dude?

No, you just accused someone you don't know of being a child rapist, and refused to provide any evidence of such, all because he has different viewpoints to yours. These are the kinds of arguments you've been presenting, and it's laughably pathetic.

Merely pointing out the logical fallacies you keep spewing. Why do you use them so often?

Calling someone pathetic for trying to resolve a debate by taking an online IQ test isn't a logical fallacy. Your low IQ is peaking through.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

No, you just accused someone you don't know of being a child rapist,
Actually no, I did not. I merely expressed my suspicion. I never accused him of any such thing. Everyone with adequate reading comprehension skills can clearly see that.

I accused him of disseminating disinformation to kids and provided a link to it.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Based on his limited ability to effectively debate and his childish one or two word retorts I would put Muhammed's IQ at about 100... maybe lower...Yeah Justin Bieber beats him.

Bill Nye is an educator and as such his job is to make science interesting and digestible for young minds to grasp. Often those demonstrations need to be simplified to achieve that goal.
Had Muhammed actually watched and read his link to his supposed "fake experiment", he would have realized that Nye only did the voice over explaining well understood science of how long-wave infrared radiation creates greater thermal gain in a CO2 rich atmosphere.
Nye did not conduct the illustration of the science experiment.
In fact the clown who duplicated the demonstration gave a disclaimer, at the end, that the well established science behind it was real and he in no way refuted that.
You loose all the arguments here Muhammed. Nye did not take part in the demonstration itself ... Nye has never been shown to be a molester of children in any way shape or form ... you have not debunked the greenhouse gas science where elevated CO2 has been proven to contribute to atmospheric warming...and most of all you have not demonstrated that you have even an average intellect to anyone here.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

That is a lie. Why are you lying to the forum?

That was not a lie ... it was an observation.
You know next to nothing about Bill Nye and you indicted him as a suspected child molester on no knowledge or evidence what so ever.
Your argument came straight from ignorance of any facts.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

That was not a lie ... it was an observation.
You know next to nothing about Bill Nye and you indicted him as a suspected child molester on no knowledge or evidence what so ever.
Your argument came straight from ignorance of any facts.

Apparently everyone who works with children is probably a child molester. I mean, why else would they want to work with children?

My wife is an elementary school teacher so maybe I should be worried. If Bill Nye wore a priest uniform to work, he might have a point.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

That was not a lie ... it was an observation.
You know next to nothing about Bill Nye and you indicted him as a suspected child molester on no knowledge or evidence what so ever.
Your argument came straight from ignorance of any facts.
You are merely repeating your lies again.

So what do you think of Bill Nye faking an experiment? You seem to be avoiding that issue. WTF?
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Your concession is respectfully accepted.
This retort amounts to an equivalence of the childish refrain we all heard in grade school; "sure you are, but what am I?"
Surely a genius of Muhammed's claimed IQ could respond on a higher intellectual plane than that of a toddler.:lamo
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

This retort amounts to an equivalence of the childish refrain we all heard in grade school; "sure you are, but what am I?"
Surely a genius of Muhammed's claimed IQ could respond on a higher intellectual plane than that of a toddler.:lamo
Feel free to refrain from your repeated ad hominems and take the test.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

You are merely repeating your lies again.

So what do you think of Bill Nye faking an experiment? You seem to be avoiding that issue. WTF?

I have addressed that very issue several times here in this thread. Nye merely narrated the voice over done in pre-production of the video demonstration of well established and accepted science. He did not take part in the video demonstration.
I repeat , I did not lie... I made an accurate observation of your childish straw-man tactics.
You have nothing more than a wild un-founded accusation and an under-educated opinion of the man.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

I have addressed that very issue several times here in this thread. Nye merely narrated the voice over done in pre-production of the video demonstration of well established and accepted science. He did not take part in the video demonstration.
I repeat , I did not lie... I made an accurate observation of your childish straw-man tactics.
You have nothing more than a wild un-founded accusation and an under-educated opinion of the man.
There you go lying again. Nothing you said in that post is factual.
 
Re: Bill Nye the Science Guy to debate Creation museum founder Ken Ham[W:164]

Feel free to refrain from your repeated ad hominems and take the test.

Feel free to refrain from your repeated ad hominems and take the test.
My comments are not ad hominems. An ad hominem would be calling someone a name without accuracy or foundation...as you have done with Mr. Nye
What I have done here is to assess you based on your posts and retorts and given a hypothesis as to what you are.
When you can demonstrate any level of discourse that is above average intellect I will consider the validity of a self administered online IQ test .
So far you have been sadly lacking.
 
Back
Top Bottom